The question however, is whether or not we are morally obligated to vote. If we are, does our vote make any difference at all and is the act of voting even rational? The purpose of this essay is to discuss the…
Download file to see previous pages...
Based on the idea of individual morality, an act can be defined as rational if its expected costs do not exceed its expected benefits as defined by the individual making the decision. The expected costs of voting would include travel expenses as well as time spent researching the candidates and updating a voter’s registration card. It can be deduced then that the expected costs of voting are quite small. The outcome of having voted could result in the winning of either the candidate one has voted for or another candidate altogether. It is easy to decide not to vote as one single vote is almost irrelevant compared to millions of other votes; but if everyone adopted this viewpoint then no one would vote and we might end up living in a dictatorship form of government where the people have no say at all. So, it can be said that voting may cost an individual (even though the cost is rather miniscule) more then the expected benefit, as the individual can argue that their vote will never make a difference among all the other votes but the cost though small, is certain. This however, is from an individual’s perspective as opposed to looking at a group of people or the entire country.
It may be theoretically irrational for an individual to waste time and money voting as the outcome of the election will not balance on their vote, but the individual votes of a group of people suddenly becomes rational as the cost remains small to each individual but the election outcome in the group’s favor will be beneficial. From a consequentiality’s perspective, the goal is to act in the most moral way to bring about positive consequences for a group as a whole. This clearly means that voting is certainly the moral thing to do for the majority and outweighs the minimal costs to individuals.
Critically speaking however, it can also be said that moral responsibility is attached to individuals and their actions so seeking the best possible outcome should also
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Morals originate in people’s beliefs and are based on their principles and values which serve as guides for their actions. The fundamental difference between the moral rules and the legal rules is that while the former are voluntary, the latter are obligatory upon every individual of the society.
The author states that some philosophers hold the opinion that moral obligation refers to the laws that cannot be advised. Bentham gives the justification of good and bad as ‘pleasure’ and ‘pain’. According to Bentham, nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure.
Second, Americans abdicate their right to complain about the direction of their government and society when they fail to vote. Finally, the very existence of our system of government simply depends on the people's participation in the political process. Any one of these reasons should be sufficiently compelling in and of itself to convince people to vote.
if we don’t vote, we have no rights to complain about anything that the government does and if we want to complain it is important that we cast a vote. It is also essential to understand that the country is a democracy. This leads us to the next point.
This moral obligation is supposed to be extended from small groups, local organizations and even among all people in the world. Being moral entails taking an ethical consideration regarding every event or issues that is involved in interaction of all
Social institutions rely on the belief of autonomy where people have a freedom to worship, marry, and work. There are various reasons that explain the use of the stakeholder’s theories. The coping strategy proposes that the chance of having a governmental intervention and regulations increases when decision making in business conflicts.
Keeping a healthy relationship with people that surround you by maintaining the moral obligations that fall under you can help you get through life with ease knowing that they would do the same for you.
The number of people migrating to
Voting is morally important as it changes equality, and scope of the government. Electro outcome can be equally harmful or beneficial. The elected government can choose to be just or unjust to its citizens. It is important to have a moral obligation during a voting process. The purpose of this paper is to define the ethics during a voting process.
the spread of communism, but also it had a moral obligation to help the South Vietnamese, who faced harsh living conditions to have better lives and secure freedom from the violent attacks of North Vietnam.
The U.S. involvement was necessary because it had to protect South
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Do we have a moral obligation to vote for FREE!