Adjusting to Terrorism - Essay Example

Adjusting to Terrorism Terrorism instantly stirs fear towards the non-combatants as it is generally associated with violence and harmful acts done by terrorists. The motive is either political or codified inclinations or motives. Terrorism’s prior situation was due to the numerous causal factors as cited by Hans Kochler in his work Terrorism and the Quest for the Just World Order, (2002). The list is sorted from the most clamorous to the least: territorial conflict, religious conflict, ethnic conflict, political stages, dilatory economy, and high unemployment (Kochler, 2002). The U.S Department of Defense defines terrorism as the “unlawful use of force or violence against person or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (Levine, 2001).

In the context, it is suggestive that the goal of terrorism may vary, including the possible take over of the terrorists in the administration. The September 11 attack dubbed for serious threat in humanity of the harm those terrorists able to do. Bush administration proposed doctrines in the U.S. Foreign Policy. However, the continuous social mishaps brought by terrorists in certain parts of neighboring countries deny the effectiveness of the policy, which also raised serious questions of its reliance (Eitzen and Zinn, 2004).

Proposals to Combat Terrorism Through numerous filed case of terrorists’ attacks, in addressing this issue, could already lead the intellects to come up with the possible strategies and proposal for its combat. Islamic extremists is one of the many possible sources of terrorism, it is suggestive to concentrate on this substance, as to neutralize its current threat. In this type of cold war, military strength and missile shield are not the answer. Overwhelming military and economic dominance did not guarantee protection from nineteen men who hijacked four planes with plastic knives, and turned them into guided missiles (Eitezen and Zinn, 2004).

Responding to the similar violent attacks would not benefit any of the fighting forces, but most like likely it will just resume to never-ending violence. In a strict strategic of terrorists, the savage response could be their anticipation to win sympathy and converts to their cause (Lewis, 2001). The most effective way to deal with terrorism is to address its root causes. Social scholars like Stanley Eitzenn and Maxine Baca Zinn, through their work Social Problems, Ninth Edition, (2004) suggested that it’s about time for the administration to listen to the enemies with their grievances, as there’s obviously a reason for them to act with such.

One of the roots is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and this must be resolved. Palestinian needed more assistance from the administration in order for them to reinforce their economy; the Palestinian state must be established (Eitzenn and Zinn, 2004). Second, U.S. troops and bases must be taken out from Arab states, Egypt, Oman, and Saudi Arabia. This move will be favorable to the Muslim people in their own territories. This is also to show respect to the symbol of power, from the cradle of Islam.

Third is to reach out third world countries, as some of the poor countries from the Strait of Gibralter to the archipelago of Indonesia is where the seat of the terrorism lies. The impoverished young men accept the role of suicide bomber to replace their destitute existence for the promised of paradise to them. By providing them their needs, the attempt to accept to be a terrorist will surely diminish.ReferencesHans Köchler. 2002. Terrorism and the Quest for a Just World Order. Quezon City, Manila.

FSJ Book WorldLevine, Mark. 2001. 10 Things to Know About Terrorism. AlterNet Online. Available at www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11647Lewis, Bernard. 2001. Understanding Bin Laden. Rocky Mountain News. September 22:4B-5BEitzenn, Stanley and Zinn, Maxine Baca. 2004. Social Problems, Ninth Edition. Pearson Education, Inc. Boston.