NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects - Essay Example

More specifically, the use of force within the international community has been expanded around the world. Appropriately armed soldiers are ready to intervene every moment in any area around the world because there are indications that the rights or the lives of people are in danger. However, there is no adequate evidence that these military interventions are appropriately planned and there is no clear explanation regarding the source of the relevant decision (i.e. who has the power and the authenticity to decide on the appropriateness and the ‘legality’ of a particular regime internationally).

The problem is more severe in cases where the lack of any approval by the international community is revealed (like in the case of Kosovo). The validity of use of force within the international community even if the approval of international organization exists, needs to be thoroughly analyzed and evaluated highlighting the possible steps of the whole procedure that should be improved. The development of military conflicts around the world has become a common phenomenon. In most cases these conflicts are not totally justified but they have been caused because of the existence of specific personal interests regarding the use or the control over a particular area.

However, there are also cases where military invasions within countries are taking place as an initiative of the international community and are considered to be appropriate solutions for the limitation of these conflicts or the protection of local population from a ‘cruel’ political power. On the other hand, the human casualties related with these conflicts have raised significant questions towards the international authorities as to whether the particular interventions are justified. Regarding this issue it is noticed that ‘at the beginning of the twenty-first