We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Inductive Reasoning - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Psychological studies f formal reasoning have fallen largely into two domains: deductive reasoning and statistical inference. These two endeavours have much in common and some researchers work in both areas. In both cases, participants are presented with what problem-solving researchers call well-defined problems…
Download full paper

Extract of sample
Inductive Reasoning

Download file to see previous pages... Instead, a correct solution is achieved by applying a normatively appropriate rule f inference. Normative systems are often applied to formal reasoning problems in order to define solutions as right or wrong, such that these problems are then construed as tests f correct and fallacious reasoning. Hence, these problems are designed to measure the extent to which participants bring to the laboratory an understanding - and ability to apply - the relative normative principles.
In the case f deductive reasoning research, the relevant normative system is formal logic. Participants are given some premises and asked whether a conclusion follows. Under strict deductive reasoning instructions, they are told (a) to assume that the premises are true and (b) to draw or approve only conclusions that necessarily follow. As observed elsewhere (Evans, 2002), this widely used method was developed over 40 years ago when belief in logic as a normative and descriptive system for human reasoning was very much higher than it is today. In spite f the method, much evidence has emerged to support the conclusion that pragmatic factors play a large part in human reasoning. We say "in spite of" because standard deductive instructions aim to suppress precisely those factors that dominate informal reasoning: the introduction f prior belief and the expression f uncertainty in premises and conclusions.
In research on statistical inference, a similar story is found. People are asked to make statistical inference on the basis f well-defined problems, in which relevant probabilities or frequency distributions are provided, and their answers are assessed for correctness against the norms provided by the probability calculus. Research in this tradition has been mostly conducted by researchers in the "heuristics and biases" tradition inspired by the work f Danny Kahneman and Amos Tversky (Gilovich, Griffin, & Kahneman, 2002; Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982). This results in an arguably negative research strategy that is similar to much work on deductive reasoning. That is, researchers show primarily what people cannot do (conform to the principles f logic or probability theory) and only secondarily address what people actually do.
Indeed, one f the most common explanations for why intelligent, educated individuals often fail to reason normatively is that they use informal reasoning processes to solve formal reasoning tasks. For example, notwithstanding instructions to the contrary, reasoners often supplement the information they are provided with background knowledge and beliefs, and make inferences that are consistent with, rather than necessitated by, the premises. If this is the case, it is reasonable to suggest that we study these processes directly, by giving our participants tasks that allow them to express these types f behaviours freely, rather than indirectly, via the observation f poor performance on a formal task. (Vallee-Tournageau 2005)
The argument for doing so becomes even more compelling when it is understood that performance on any given reasoning task ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
The Good, the Bad and Marijuana
This was given the scientific name Cannabis sativa. It is more commonly known in Europe as Cannabis however in Northern America it is widely known as Marijuana (Iversen, 5-7). It has been cultivated into many species around the globe. Due to the addicting effect after abusive use of the plant, there has been reports as to how deadly cannabis is.
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper
English Comp-analysis essay using inductive reasoning
Spiritual enlightenment is a very thorough process in which a human being’s soul is uplifted towards the divine light and thus brightening his whole personality. Thus it can be said that spiritual enlightenment is the ultimate end of human life and need deeper awakening of the spirit or the soul.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning
(3)A new inquiry has found that nearly a decade after the scandal engulfed the American church, children are still in peril (4) and some leaders are still stonewalling investigations. A grand-jury report released Feb. 10 accused three priests and a teacher in the Philadelphia Archdiocese of raping two young boys in the 1990s.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Inductive and deductive reasoning
This paper is going to evaluate whether public workers should be allowed to join unions and engage in collective bargaining by use of inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive and deductive reasoning Introduction A union is an organized group of people who have come together in order to achieve some objectives that are familiar to all of them.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Inductive Reasoning in Frankenstein
Isatu Mansaray-Colbert English Composition II Frankenstein Evaluation Essay April 19, 2013 Inductive Reasoning in Frankenstein Frankenstein depicts some of the most intriguing aspects of an individual’s mind, when it is in its embryonic stages. The plot is constructed around a brilliant scientist who fashions a grotesque creature.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
The Difference Between Inductive And Deductive Reasoning. How Are Issues Of Validity And Truth Distinguished
What is the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning? How do you distinguish between issues of validity and truth? Inductive reasoning is a type of logic in which the general rule or propositions are derived from specific examples. The examples are individual or specific instances that are evaluated and the findings obtained from the specific examples are accumulated to form a general rule.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
The Destructive Male
She claims that governments ran by men are representative of social disorganization and civil religious. She discusses the clear meaning of manhood suffrage so as not to confuse the reader about what is happening.
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Ethical Reasoning
However, the accuracy of the conclusions in inductive reasoning is doubtable and thus it is a risky form type of logical thinking. This form of reasoning is commonly used in philology and applied mostly in
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Disc Week Six
Observation in inductive reasoning is quite casual since inductive hypothesis is purely based on that, to be more precise it’s based on facts. According to Hacker, “when we draw a conclusion from an array of facts, we are engaged in inductive reasoning” (Hacker
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Executive vs. Non-executive Pay
Executive pay is directed in respect of the guidelines laid down by the board of directors while non executive pay is done in without the respect of any regulation. There are differenced between executive and non executive pay. In executive pay the
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper
Using deductive and inductive reasoning write a paper stating why teenagers should have a curfew
Lack of curfews in different environments for teenagers is a total exposure to risks. Resultant effects include peer pressure and extreme indiscipline cases, which reshapes the student’s future. In addition, maintaining curfews for teenagers improve their
1 Pages(250 words)Term Paper
Let us find you another Essay on topic Inductive Reasoning for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us