Nobody downloaded yet

Arguments for and against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq - Literature review Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The author of the review “Arguments for and against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq” hopes that Americans - taking into account the facts found in the most authentic sources - will demand an overhaul of the US foreign policy so that the neoconservative craving power will be terminated…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.4% of users find it useful
Arguments for and against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Arguments for and against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq"

Download file to see previous pages Right through its history, America has not hesitated to use force under the pretexts of principles, sovereignty, and justice.  American military intervention in world affairs has risen drastically since the end of the Second World War.  The period following the Second World War saw America assume the role of a superpower that headed the western coalition in what was a bipolar world.  Since the collapse of Soviet Union, America has had at its disposal the most potent military force.  Its economic structure complements military spending; leading to a military industrial complex.
Noted political commentator Ivo Daalder raises some valid questions regarding the legitimacy of the invasion.  Daalder argues that the invasion was illegitimate on two counts: 1.there was no provocation from Iraq and 2.the United Nations Security Council did not approve of the war.  Military actions of countries such as Iran and North Korea were condemned by the U.N. and the United States alike.  If the same standards were to be applied to all participant countries then the United States deserves its condemnation.
On the other hand, supporters of the Bush Administration argue that toppling Saddam Hussein was a just act that needs no further legitimacyю  Liberating the country from an oppressive dictatorship is deemed a just act in and of itself.  Apart from the geopolitical significance of Bush Administration’s militarism, the image of the country is also at stake.  Popular opinion in the rest of the world is very unfavorable towards Americans – they don’t seem to make a distinction between the government and its populace.  According to Robert Kagan,
“To forge a renewed political consensus on the use of force, we first need to recognize that international legitimacy does matter. It matters to Americans, who want to believe they are acting justly and are troubled if others accuse them of selfish, immoral or otherwise illegitimate behavior. It matters to our democratic friends and allies, whose support may attest to the justness of the cause and whose participation may often be necessary to turn a military victory into a lasting political success.” ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Arguments for and against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq Literature review”, n.d.)
Arguments for and against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq Literature review. Retrieved from
(Arguments for and Against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq Literature Review)
Arguments for and Against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq Literature Review.
“Arguments for and Against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq Literature Review”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Arguments for and against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq

Compare and Contrast the 1991 and 2003 Iraq War

...are to be decided by the UN; not by US. When UK decided to use its forces along with that of US against Iraq, one has to assume that it either was misinformed by the US, or was working to save its own oil interests as an old imperialist nation. For example, the Ninth Report of Session 2002-2003 in the House of Commons- Foreign Affairs Committee points out that Iraq had chemical and biological weapons capability, long range missile capability, nuclear weapons program, and uranium supply from Africa (House of Commons, 2003). Thus, in total, it becomes evident that ascertaining the exact reasons behind the Iraq war is rather impossible....
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Iraq invasion 2003

...). The fact is that the lobby always feared that Bush administration would be forced to give up the support for Israeli expansionist ambitions to appease the Arab oil producers. Thus, for them, the war meant a permanent solution (ibid). By seizing Iraq’s enormous oil fields, America would no more have to appease the Arab interests. Also, access to Iraqi oil could be used to break the OPEC and destabilise the oil producing Muslim states. According to Grubach (n.d.: para. 10), the war meant two things: firstly, America would not be forced to depend on Arab nations for oil, and, secondly, America would be able to fully support Israeli interests. Thus, it becomes evident that Iraq invasion of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Arguments for and against Abortion

...? Arguments for and against Abortion Grade (4th, Nov. Arguments for and against Abortion Part The issue of abortion has been controversial for a long time. While some people argue that it is acceptable, others argue that it is wrong. Mary Anne Warren argues that abortion is not wrong. In support of her argument, she presents the following facts: According to Mary Anne Warren, abortion is not wrong because; removing a fetus from a mother’s womb is not taking away the life of a human being (Ford, 2002). According to her, killing a human being is wrong. However, a fetus does not qualify to be a human being because it does not have consciousness (Ford, 2002)....
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Arguments against abortion

...? Abortion Generally, human pregnancy has been divided into three trimesters, each lasting three months. Issues such as miscarriage, preterm birth and genetic abnormality and trauma could cause the termination of pregnancy. The debate on abortion, however, has been on the induced abortion, carried out at any gestational stage for a given purpose. The controversy lies on when and whether abortion should be done and the extent to which it should be denied or encouraged. It is this debate that has caused other countries to legalize abortion, such as the US, while others, such as Brazil, still consider the procedure illegal (Naden, 2008). This paper argues against abortion, based on its conflict with religious and moral...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Against War In Iraq

...Against War in Iraq Introduction Taking terrorism to another country in order to combat it on one's own is certainly beyond prudent comprehension. USA has invaded Afghanistan and Iraq in its attempt of fighting back the 9/11 attacks of terrorism. Instead of strategizing this war on terror, USA has struck the innocent beings of Iraq harsh. In this essay I aim to argue against this war in Iraq, supporting my argument by war facts and various published reports. Body of Essay Whatever the motive Bush Administration had, it certainly does not seem to bring anybody or us any good to take war on Iraq. It has...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Arguments against abortion

...ARGUMENTS AGAINST ABORTION "America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has sown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father's role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

The war between US an Iraq 2003

..., 2003, the world was witness to the second gulf war with the invasion of American troops in Iraq. War was launched against Iraq because of the latter’s alleged possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) which were in apparent violation of its terms of surrender in the wake of its Kuwaiti invasion in the early 1990s. Although inspections by the UN on Iraqi weapons depots and military institutions yielded no WMDs, US intelligence reports insisted that Iraq was in possession of such weapons. After a series of failed negotiations and after Iraq refused UN inspections in the early months leading up...
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper

Iraq Invasion of Kuwait: Gulf War 1990-1991

...Iraq Invasion of Kuwait: Gulf War 1990-1991 The outline of the study is as follows: (a) Introduction...………………………………………............................................p 2 1.0 Brief history of Kuwait...........................................................................p 2 2.0 The ruling family in Kuwait...................................................................p 2 3.0 Geography of Kuwait..............................................................................p 3 4.0 Demographic information of Kuwait.......................................................p 3 (b) Body 1.0 Reasons for Iraq Aggression against...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

The Iraq War 2003 in Western media and public opinion

... The Iraq War 2003 in Western media and public opinion When the US and UK invaded Iraq in 2003, opinion polls in both countries indicated varying levels of support for the invasion before, during, and after the war. For instance, in the US, polls conducted in mid-March indicated that 56% of the respondents supported the war while 41% opposed it (Hafez 2003, p. 9). In the UK, opinion polls conducted during the same period indicated that 26% of the public supported the war while 63% opposed it. In April, opinion polls in both countries indicated a dramatic shift in public support of the war. For example, in the UK, public support rose to...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

International relation&the 2003 Intervention in Iraq

...International Relation the 2003 Intervention in Iraq The second Bush administration did not follow the path that wasfollowed by the first Bush administration of using the United Nations or multilateralism because the tact used to overthrow Saddam Hussein in the first Gulf War failed to bear fruits (Lamy, 1). After the first Gulf War, the Clinton and the Bush administrations had hoped that the sanctions imposed on Iraq both economic and the imposition of the no fly zone in northern and Southern Iraq could result in an internal rebellion within by members of the Baath regime (Popular Social Science 1). There was no the mandate of the United Nations; it was a...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Literature review on topic Arguments for and against the Legitimacy of 2003 Invasion of Iraq for FREE!

Contact Us