Israel's 1967 attack against Egypt - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
 This assignment discusses the events that happened prior to the actual June 1967 war, Israel was justified in attacking. The assignment analyses another event that foreshadowed the 1967 War was the water dispute with Lebanon and Jordan…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.8% of users find it useful
Israels 1967 attack against Egypt
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Israel's 1967 attack against Egypt"

Israels 1967 Attack Against Egypt 28 October 2009 Discussion Considering all the events that happened prior to the actual June 1967 war, Israel was justified in attacking. The catalyst for that happened almost a decade earlier during the Suez Canal Crisis of 1956 when Egypt also blocked the Straits of Tiran to all Israeli shipping. The result was that Egypt being defeated militarily but came out a winner politically as Israel was forced to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula and in its place an international peacekeeping force was installed to serve as a buffer. Another event that foreshadowed the 1967 War was the water dispute with Lebanon and Jordan who had constructed dams to divert the Jordan River from reaching the Sea of Galilee. There were a number of other provocations such as incessant guerrilla attacks against Israeli civilians but the trigger event was expulsion of the United Nations Emergency Force from the Sinai Peninsula as ordered by Gamal Nasser in May 1967. He had ordered the Straits of Tiran closed to Israeli shipping and had amassed 100,000 troops together with 1,000 tanks on the border but he was not a threat (
I think Israels preventive strike would fall under Classification No. 3 (Easier to Justify Preventive War) considering all prior events leading to it. Egypt had shown hostile intent and engaged in inflammatory rhetoric and took preparatory steps prior to taking hostile action by amassing troops on the border and expelling the peacekeeping force in the region. It might be helpful also for the sake of discussion to describe the mood in Israel at that time. The country was in economic recession, the full horrors of the Holocaust was belatedly realized by its citizens and Israels neighbors did not want to sign any peace agreements with it (Segev, 8) and had steadfastly refused to even recognize the existence of Israel as legitimate (Bard, 1).
On this second case of former Pres. Bushs preventive war against Iraq in 2003, is not justifiable and belongs to Classification No. 2 (Difficult to Justify Preventive War) because at the time of the invasion, all he had were suspicions that Saddam Hussein had harbored secret nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programs or WMD (weapons of mass destruction) without any proof whatsoever. This pretext was actually in pursuance of a bigger design and that is to control the worlds second largest proven oil reserves after Saudi Arabia. While it is true that Saddam had refused United Nations inspectors into the country, all he had done was play bluff with the US and other world powers by pretending he had these weapons as a show of strength against potential enemy Iran (which he had fought earlier in the previous decade).
There is another aspect that needs to be looked into and this was another suspicion that Saddam somehow had something to do with the September 11, 2001 twin tower attacks. There was this growing feeling in the administration at that time that a failure to act would result in another follow-up attack on US soil and so there must have been a connection with Osama Bin Ladins al-Qaida and Saddams Iraq (Landay, April 21, 2009). The quest to find this link had led to those abusive interrogation techniques bordering on torture to justify the invasion of Iraq after it was found there were no WMD inside the country. Former Pres. Bush used the higher-order moral obligation argument to launch the invasion against Iraq in 2003. He had taken the view that the state is the unit-carrier of the moral rights of American citizens who have the right to be protected and defended against any future attacks.
Works Cited
Anonymous. The 1967 War and the Israeli Occupation of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. From the Jews for Justice in the Middle East. Web. Retrieved 28 October 2009 from
Bard, Mitchell. The 1967 Six-Day War. Jewish Virtual Library. From the American Israeli Cooperative Enterprise. Web. Retrieved 28 October 2009 from
Landay, Jonathan S. Report: Abusive Tactics Used to Seek Iraq-al Qaida Link. On-line. McClatchy Newspapers (April 21, 2009). Web. Retrieved 28 October 2009 from
Segev, Tom. 1967: Israel, the War and the Year that Transformed the Middle East. New York, NY, USA: Metropolitan Books, 2007. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Israel's 1967 attack against Egypt Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Israel's 1967 attack against Egypt Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from
(Israel'S 1967 Attack Against Egypt Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Israel'S 1967 Attack Against Egypt Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words.
“Israel'S 1967 Attack Against Egypt Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Israel's 1967 attack against Egypt

Egypt and Israel Relations: History of The Wars

..., while the Russians gained it.” (John Lewis Gaddis) Six Day War 1967 After a period of intensified tension between Israel and its neighboring Arab countries of Egypt, Jordan and Syria, a war broke out on the 5th of June 1967, after Israel launched surprised air strikes against the Arab armed forces. The war continued for about 6 days and therefore it is regarded as the Six Day War in the history. After the Suez Canal Crisis, Egypt agreed to the stationing of the United Nations Emergency Force along its border with Israel in the Sinai region. In the years to come Israel had numerous...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper


...of Orisis was attended to and military campaigns were sent, that contributed in regaining Egypt`s lost land. Finest carved reliefs and outstanding monuments like Mentuhotep's mortuary complex are the gifts of this dynasty to the Egyptian history (Meyers, 1996). When the Huskos invaded this land, the Second Intermediate(1650-1550 BCE) Period started which was characterized mainly by decentralization, change of center to Thebes, production of literary and scientific text and administrative records. This era ended after the Theban rulers drove Huskos away from Avaris. Subsequent rise of the Theban ruler Ahmose ushered the New Kingdom (1550-1069 BCE) and the pharaohs commanded unimaginable wealth.The Empire...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Israel-Palestine Conflict and the Role of Egypt

...and Egypt and thus these Arab countries served as the bases for the Palestine Liberation Organization, an organization formed by the leaders of the Arab armed struggle against Israel. The armed infiltrators trained by PLO in Jordan and Egypt attacked various civilian and military targets in Israel during the later years giving rise to more wars between Arab states and Israel. The United States has always sided with the Israeli government and state in all of these conflicts and has provided assistance to the Israeli state in the form of military as well as political aid. The very primitive justification given by the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay


...? Attack Attack Arab-Israeli quest for peace is a worthy cause that has often been inhibited by both the Palestinians’ interests and the Israelis’ interests. Although both nationalities thirst for stability and security in the region, they are caught up fighting for their individual interests. Palestine fights for its nationalism. On the other hand, Israel maintains an iron fist in its bid to survive in a region where she is surrounded by her enemies. For that cause, Israel is willing to use oppressive and defensive measures to uphold and extend her territorial boundaries. Israel uses all possible means to ensure that the balance of power in the Middle...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Israeli perception on the six day war and the security dilemma

...? Israeli Perception of the Six Day War and the Security Dilemma al Affiliation In this paper, the perception of Israeli on the Six Day War and the security dilemma is discussed. The war broke out on June 5, 1967 and ended on June 10 the same year. This war was between five Arab countries namely: Israel, Egypt, Syria, Jordan and other neighboring countries. It was caused by the Egypt`s decision to block Israeli from navigating on the Gulf of Aqaba, its decision to withdraw UN forces from Sinai, the blockage of the strait of Tiran and Fatah and PLO raid on Israel. The Israeli were angered by the actions of the Arab Nations and the lack of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Attack Plan

...such as Goodwill would struggle to raise the needed financial capital it needs on a monthly basis. In addition, an attack that threatens the integrity of donor information will also be an attack on the trustworthiness of the organization. If individual donors can no longer feel that their information is safe with Goodwill, they will likely cease to give to the charitable organization. One goal of an attack of this magnitude would be that an individual or group of people simply want to cause harm to the organization. This could be as a result of simple malicious behavior, or because the individual holds a grudge of some sort against the company. In addition, accessing...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay


...took place after World War I when a war was decared on the Ottoman Empire by the British. During this time, the British appointed Husayn Kamil as the sultan and although Egypt did not take part in the war in terms of army, it was severely affected. Husayn Kamil was then succeeded by Ahmad Fuad who later became the King Fuad I and declared independence (“Egypt”, n.pag.). 1928: Muslim Brotherhood was founded The Muslim Brotherhood was created by Hassan al-Banna as an Islamic socio-political movement in 1928. The Muslim Brotherhood proved to be an important force in voicing against British rule in Egypt and was a key opposition force in the country. 1948:...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay


...Egypt Changing lifestyle as evident in the contemporary society has continually provided reasons that vali the different family planning campaigns that governments run in their respective countries. Claiming that family planning is an element of transnational government with the view of creating new types of subjects and individuals in a post-colonial world is preposterous. While the anthropologist-cum-physician at the University of Texas strives to provide realistic explanations to his argument, he fails to provide realistic solutions and deliberately ignores the importance of family planning in the contemporary society. Family planning is a necessity in the modern world since it seeks to better the lives of people by...
2 Pages(500 words)Book Report/Review

Egypt: Sinai Peninsula attack kills 17

... Egypt: Sinai Peninsula attack kills 17 Summary The government has failed the Egyptian’s citizens inproviding permanent solution to terrorist threat even after their public pledge following the recent Sinai killings. Development The 2nd of April attack that killed 17 is the worse in the month recalling that the government had pledged to the international community that such cases would be history and forge to unite the country after a period of insecurities and various acts of terrorists. One can argue that this is due to their failure and lack of commitment to their people. According to the security sources, the heavily armed militia attacked and killed the 17 with 15 among them being soldiers. Nonetheless, the Egyptian forces... use of...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

An Attack against the Iraqi

.... President Bush cites instances when Iraq refused to comply with disarmament as determined by the UN Security Council. However, he does not give concrete evidence that such weapons have been discovered in Iraq. In hindsight, weapons of mass destruction were not uncovered on Iraqi soil, therefore nullifying the Bush Administration’s claims to a legitimate preemptive strike. Question 2: The preemptive strike of 1967 completed by Israel falls into the easier to justify category. According to, in 1965 Palestinian groups had begun a series of attacks that were backed by Egypt and Syria. In the following years, a buildup of Arab troops began to surround...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Israel's 1967 attack against Egypt for FREE!

Contact Us