International Interference to the Quasi States - Essay Example

International Interference to Quasi s Aid offered to Palestinian and Kurdish government ities impede domestic governance. The domestic situations in Iraq and Palestine demand foreign assistance, which come at some price. United Nation and United States among other international players use the aid they offer to these nations to institute policies, which are against the will of the Palestinian and Kurdish governments. The players send their representatives who lobby for certain policies. For instance, Palestinian conflict with Israel has attracted interest of United States and other western countries, which back peace process that restricts the action of the Palestinian government (Alshamsi 155). The relevance of political power to exercise authority over domestic issues should not depend on international players but the interest of the people of that nation. Palestine has failed to realize this power because international players influence policies, which the country uses for its domestic governance (El-Hassan 15). Palestine and Kurdish government have Muslim majority who observe Islamic principles in their daily undertaking. However, western countries’ interests have demonstrated through media and other international articles that policies inclined on religious principles will influence peaceful coexistence with other nations. I believe that this notion does not have a place in democratic world. Secularization practiced in western nations is not part of lifestyle in the east. International players tag heavy prices along side aids that they offer. Palestine and Iraq have indicated open discontentment to policies that foreign players root for in these states. Their intention is to influence domestic policies in these countries to serve their interest. International players manipulate factors that influence domestic stability of Palestinian Authority by setting standards which they expect the country to attain. History reveals that international players piled pressure on Palestinian Authority to change their administrative policies during the reign of Arafat (El-Hassan 26). Criticism piled to Arafat government influenced political structure of the country, which was evident through open rebellion portrayed to Arafat government by the Fatah. It is apparent that political structure of the country suffered under the influence of the international players because their demands forced Palestinian government to enact reforms, which destabilized its position against its conflict with Israel. International figures demonstrated open criticism to Fatah movement, which supported Arafat stand on issues of international concern. Analysts have observed that political alignment in Palestine Authority breathe a lot of influence from international players who are keen to implement their interest in this nation. Palestine Authority depends on aid given the fragility of the nation. International players proposed changes on law, which govern the nation under the guise that the country governing body, had failed to stump corruption. Some nations such as Saudi Arabia have showed their open protest against the role of United States in imposing policies to Palestinian Authority. Internal minister of Saudi Arabia argued that justice does not exist in an event when United States and other likeminded nations pass laws, which interfere with internal affairs of Palestine. Legitimacy of international policies exerted to Palestinian Authority is void because policies proposed by international bodies do not serve the interest of the Palestine. For instance, the move made by United States to influence disbandment of Hamas and other factions in Palestine (El-Hassan 36) is an indication of international interest portrayed by US government against the Palestine government. The argument against factions in Palestine does not hold water because these factions advocate for rights of Palestinian people as opposed to ill feeling attitude against these groups projected by US and other players from western countries. International players including United States have failed to recognize legitimate resistance which Palestine Authority have demonstrated against Israel terming it as terrorism (Alshamsi 155). Terrorism in its own context does not appeal to leadership of any country. It is surprising to see international players arguing that legitimate resistance of Palestine people against atrocities perpetrated by Israel as terrorism act (Alshamsi 155). Critics of the western countries believe that such a notion does not offer any opportunity for Palestine Authority to express its dissatisfaction because the players impede the process of accessing justice. Some critics believe that US inversion to Kurdish government was a political move intended to change the leadership structure of the Iraq and Palestine (Blanchard 20). Iraq had in the past offered aid to Palestine a fact that western players criticized as aiding terrorism against the Jews nation. President Bush indicated in his sentiments that the world had to move with speed in changing leadership structure and operation of the Palestinian and Kurdish government. The statement asserts that government processes in these two nations had to comply with some set standard created by international players. Critics have questioned the interest of United States in Palestine and Iraq. It has emerged that selfish interest of international players directed towards these countries seek to see their leadership subjecting to the so called of authority of the United States. Pressure piled to the Kurdish government indicates that international players influence government processes in Iraq. International players often demonstrate favor against candidates who seem to favor their ideologies (Yildiz, et. al. 271). Historians believe that the Kurdish Regional Government borrowed a lot of aid from United States and other international players, which influenced policies regarding the country’s petroleum industry. The change of leadership structure in Iraq involved western players, which served the interest of United States (Yildiz, et. al. 271). Passing laws, which would allow international companies to mine oil in Iraq, is a demonstration that international interest played a role in influencing deliberation of Kurdish Regional government. Revenues that international oil companies expect to get from Iraq oil mining would help the international interests. Reaction towards constitution initiation by Kurdish government shows that international politics played some role in influencing policies of Iraq. Critics of United States have indicated in their argument that Kurdish government serves the interest of United States and western countries. Oil production in Iraq is the key factor that supports the economy. Kurdish government has failed to enact policies without consulting international players due to the fear that international players would cut their link (aid) to the Iraq. Critics in international affairs of Arab countries believe that such moves impose pressure on governing style thus denying the Kurdish Government the authority to exert it views to its people. Iraq political inclination opposed western structures until the toppling of Saddam Hussein. United States constituted the formation of Kurdish government which many critics feel address concern of international interest over national interest (Yildiz, et. al. 272). The international community takes the advantage of fragility of the Kurdish Government to influence its operations by dictating terms according to aid they offer. America had demonstrated its disapproval of previous rule in Iraq over allegation that it supported terrorism interests. Independent observers believe that the sudden change of interest of United States to Iraq is because of oil. Kurdish government authority has yielded to pressures from international players, which directly impedes its actions towards economic growth of Iraq. The international community through World Bank initiated talks, which intend to introduce World Bank procedures in Iraq. Left wing thinkers believe that such an approach does not leave Kurdish government with the ability to institute its own policies (Allawi 102). The past regime did not observe policies related to World Bank. The independence of the Kurdish government authority thus exists in thoughts but not in real sense. International standard demanded by the international community is not in good faith, as one would perceive. The load that Kurdish government has bear while receiving aid from the international community include following international standards when enacting policies on trade and political structure of the country (Allawi 94). Palestinian authority have to fight between accepting what they feel is right or fail to receive aid from the international community. This situation leaves Palestinian authority with little options of maintaining its stands on matters concerning its conflict with Israel. Political analysts believe that Jews thinkers in US government influence action of United States against Palestine when it addresses its issues about Israel invasions (Alshamsi 155). The international community in many occasions condemns Palestinian rocket invasions to Israel terming them as terrorist approaches. The international community has failed on a number of occasions to vote against Israel actions against Palestine. The hand of international community does not stand for justice, which they purport to advocate in the world. Permanent members of the international community vet policies, which would directly subject the Palestine authority to abide by their own standards. Work cited Allawi, A. Ali. The Occupation of Iraq: Winning the War, Losing the Peace. Connecticut: Yale University Press. 2007. Print. Alshamsi, J. Mansoor. Islam and Political Reform in Saudi Arabia: The Quest for Political Change and Reform. New York: Taylor & Francis. 2011. Print. Blanchard, M. Christopher. Iraq: Oil and Gas Legislation, Revenue Sharing, and U. S. Policy. Pennsylvania: DIANE Publishing. 2010. Print. El-Hassan, A. Hasan. Israel or Palestine? Is the two-state solution already dead?: a political and military history of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. New York: Algora Publishing. Yildiz, Kerim. et. al. The Kurdish conflict: international humanitarian law and post-conflict mechanisms. New York: Taylor & Francis. 2010. Print. Read More