An Investigation of Services Marketing in the Voluntary Sector of the United Kingdom - Essay Example

Running Head: Services Marketing An Investigation of Services Marketing in the Voluntary Sector of the United Kingdom I. Introduction The focus of this study is the social care and support for older people provided by the voluntary sector in the UK. This was selected as an issue to be investigated in the field of services marketing since this sector contributes to society through its involvement in a long-established social welfare arena. There are several demographic, economic and social factors which influence the direction of the sector’s services marketing processes. The continuous ageing of the world’s population, together with increases in the percentages of aged people living alone, which is then related to the increase in divorce and remarriage rates, and persistent rise in female labour market involvement rates are all expected to restrain the competence of the voluntary sector to address effectively social demands (Hayden & Boaz 2000). Caring responsibilities will unavoidably reallocate to formal organisations. Voluntary organisations’ involvement to social care and support has exceptionally deep-seated historical origins. They antedate the realisation of personal social services as an acknowledged public policy arena. Before the development of local government owned and regulated social care in the after effects of the determining welfare legislation in the 1940s, voluntary organisations were the dominant formally structured resource of care and support. Their contribution has occasionally been underestimated by social policy analysts, who have most of the time focused on the inconsiderate and corrective state institutions of the Poor Law in tracking down primary historic social care patterns (ibid, 63). Nevertheless, institutional modernisation was much manifested in the voluntary sector, with the creation of associative voluntary communities enhancing traditional almshouses and domestically provided trusts with pre-modern roots. Connected to the religious organisations, work-related, professional and trade associations, whose wide-ranging progress were distinctive of this period, were highly structured networks of welfare societies aimed at providing superior-quality services marketing in order to address the needs of their members, including age-associated needs (Kendall 2003). Therefore, for those with the appropriate organisational connections, the poor house, labour market involvement or informal supports were by no means the mere care alternatives as they turn out to be defenceless through ageing. Services marketing in these community-based activities include visiting and institutional care and support, also restorative, retirement and rest homes were given under the maintenance of the voluntary sector (ibid, 163). Nevertheless, pre-1940s voluntary sector is still a key player in social care, and to a greater extent than in the social housing arena. The historical affluence of the services marketing processes of this voluntary sector was itself a significant justification for focusing on this subject matter for this study. A second rationale was the accessibility of verifications on how the voluntary sector compares, to the service marketing of public organisations and profit-driven sectors (Kendall 2003). Conceptual Framework As section of the welfare state agreement, the 1946 National Assistance Act awarded particular social care obligations on local government, involving accountability for the welfare aged people. Yet, for diverse political and social reasons, this policy arena in the UK, as in the case in other industrialised nations, is inclined to be a quite low-spending main concern in the periods subsequent to the war. Specifically in Britain, benchmarked with health and income support, or housing, preliminary public subsidy in this arena was fairly inadequate, with no comprehensive public sector seizure or sophisticated political attempt for the growth of public proprietorship and regulation. Instead, in a mediocre manner, local officials were sanctioned to address the needs and demands of the aged population both through constructing their own programmes of services marketing, and through subsidising voluntary organisations to accomplish these tasks (Foster 2001). Simultaneously, social care for the aged was provided enhanced thrust from within the sector between the 1930s and the 1970s with the creation of innovative national professional voluntary organisations and coalitions, specifically, organisations driven particularly towards vulnerable populations, or the aged group. Agencies such as Help the Aged, Age Concern and the Abbeyfield Society were discernible from traditional providers through their pioneering structure towards the aged in general, of all religious work-related orientations, and provided social care and housing together with a knowledge improvement goal (ibid, 92). At the countrywide level, bureaucrats communicated particularly with these new aged population-specific national societies. The Women’s Voluntary Service and the British Red Cross Society, with whom secure connections had evolved as a result of mutual response to wartime emergencies, were also significant in establishing and putting into effect the national schema. The mediocrity and unequal scope of present voluntary sector services, particularly with regard to care for vulnerable population in their own homes was confirmed in surveys. In the pro-state encouraging environment of the period, this was perceived as giving out a justification for the growth not merely of state intervention, but also of services directly supervised and owned by the government. Local officials, whose obligations in this arena were headed by Social Services Department from the latter part of the twentieth century, came into their own as the key managers of compensated care employees (Blackmore 2000). For their part, the voluntary sector now are inclined to perceive their functions, as the public community perceive them more commonly, as significantly pioneers, enhancers and niche service marketing specialists, frequently merely temporarily operating as contributors for local services which had turned out to be, or were turning out to be, popular obligations of the state, as with the case with housing care and home support. However, because services determined as primary public obligations were still essentially somewhat restricted evaluated with the complete range of demands being addressed as a reality in the community, the sector was by no means underestimated in this arena as it had been in wellbeing, social housing and social security. Specifically, to the degree voluntary involvements immersed into the informal sector and mobilise if not inaccessible community set of connections, unpaid helpers and support, the sector was acknowledged as having a rightful and lasting function (Kendall 2003). II. Services Marketing of the Voluntary Sector in Care and Support for Older People in UK Social care involves “assistance with the normal activities of daily life, including personal functioning, domestic maintenance and social activities” (ibid, 167). The services marketing of this sector, apparently involves social control, societal security and social cohesion, and the marketing terminology can hence be seen as a quasi-public welfare; its mechanisms or outcomes produce caring externalities from wherein the society, and not merely individual users, communally benefits. In the UK, the mainly important types of social care services marketing for older people have for a long-time been residential care or aged people’s homes; domiciliary care or those given by visiting individuals in their own homes; and day care wherein vulnerable populations are carried over for the day to a service in which they can gather together socially, and be given food and care services (Kendall 2003). In the first two kinds of care, the voluntary sector is important, but with a lesser market share than both the public sector and the profit sector; whereas with day care, its input is lesser than that of the public sector, yet much significant than the profit sector. As a matter of fact, merely 1 percent of older population in Britain were communicating with a helper from a voluntary organisation in 1998 (Amin 2002). Yet a much more relevant fraction of the minority of those older people who are defenceless enough to demand formal care are in acknowledgment of voluntary sector involvements which are not essentially simply covered in such surveys’ quantitative classifications. Specifically well-known in delivering such social care and associated support in the community for amongst the mainly helpless aged people are religious organisations, age-specific professionals and housing organisation custodian (ibid). The following are the key types of providers of care and support for aged people within the services marketing of the voluntary sector (Kendall 2003, 168): Traditional generalist social service agencies with services for older people operating alongside services for other people in need. Typically with pre-Second World War origins, these tend to be either directly or indirectly connected to religious denominations or based around occupational, trade or professional groupings with a wide variety of structures. Mixed funding, often including substantial income earned on historically inherited assets and accumulated financial services. Specialist social care and support groups for older people, or groups de facto oriented to older people, typically founded from around the Second World War onwards, and often with federal structures. Mixed funding, with much variety between local affiliates in terms of scope, scale and activity emphases. Some specialize in services, some in information, advocacy and policy issues, while some undertake both. Pensioners’ groups typically established to lobby for state pensions from the Second World War onwards, but now engaging to a significant degree with SSDs to promote the interests of older people as current or future users of social services. Nonprofit social entrepreneurship organizations founded and/or expanded from the 1960s onwards, but most extensively in the 1980s, in direct response to the availability of public funds, particularly for community care, training and housing programmes. These may or may not specialize in providing care for older people, can develop national structures from typically local or regional origins, and often remain heavily reliant on public funding and user contributions. Community care fora and networks established specifically to influence the planning and implementation of local social care services, particularly from the early 1990s onwards. More generally, senior citizens and older people’s forums have developed from the late 1990s. Self-help and community groups not covered in the above categories. Mixed funding. Not-for-profit trusts operating homes formerly run directly by local authorities from whom they have been “floated off”. Typically funded almost entirely by direct authority funding and user contributions. How do the services marketing nature of these sectors differ? The available empirical verification on costs draws on a mixed image, and while with social housing, hides very important intra-sector difference. Domiciliary care is more costly on standard criteria under voluntary than for-profit sector organisations, however residential and day cares are more cost-effective in the voluntary sector than in other sectors. This is even for regulation for the cost-significant impacts of variations in user vulnerability. Domiciliary care’s comparative costliness in the voluntary organisations is perhaps mainly motivated by the higher average tempos of compensation these organisations tend to compensate leading care employees. The lesser costs of the voluntary sector in other contexts appears to include various blending of factors. In day care, volunteers’ labour inputs to domestic colleagues of national professionals, and capital funding-makers’ inclinations for the voluntary sector in a comparatively unregulated and politically uncertain setting are significant (Allen et al. 1992). In residential care, on the contrary, in which comparatively significant traditional generalists and non-profit social capitalists prevail, technical markets of magnitude and scope, cross-financial support from other present activities external to social care, and traditionally amassed reserves permit voluntary organisations to be less expensive and/or charge lower costs than their chiefly small business for-profit equivalents. On standardised terms, these technical competencies advantages appear to more than prevail over any counteracting comparative cost-stimulating factors in this type of care. For instance, as with domiciliary care, leading care employees may on standard be compensated higher, increasing labour costs; whereas a for-profit candidate claimed that organisational sagging, management restrictions and x-competencies were more widespread in voluntary organisations than for-profit care homes (ibid, 115). How about productivity or outcomes? The value of social care services is generally understood to be closely tied up with the value of the workers that provide it, and the stability of care they are capable to smooth the progress of. The higher average compensation for leading workers aforementioned, together with lower occurrence of low compensation, and lower employee turnover rates benchmarked with the for-profit sector could be indicative, hence, of greater quality in services marketing. Nevertheless, consideration of social care quality should preferably include considering care consequences or proxies for such consequences also. Accordingly, it is less direct to assessment than costs. Certainly, in custom public decision-makers are inclined to depend on informal data, confidence and status as a basis for evaluating quality of services marketing in the voluntary sector revealed that field-level SSD workers point to benefits in concepts of ethics, care environments in addition to the access to local sets of arrangements related with voluntarism, echoing with the policy discussion more commonly (Kendall 2003). At a more planned stage, SSD directors have occasionally had ideological favours for the sector plainly because it does not openly include profit-seeking. Nevertheless, the use of rudimentary characteristics by sector has disappeared as the effect of market-unfriendly principles have declined, and as awareness that nominally for profit sector is characteristically not entirely stimulated by profit maximisation goal has amplified (ibid, 170). At the same time, acknowledgement of the voluntary sector’s benevolent motives have occasionally been counterbalanced by anxieties about the capabilities or efficiencies of some, specifically in coping with the mounting competitive contractual setting of the latter part of the twentieth century. Moreover, serious uncertainties regarding the voluntary sector have been obvious as far as the majority of aged population themselves are involved. As a matter of fact, this sector is merely supported as the care alternative of preference by a small minority for the widespread services on which there are sufficient data available, with the public sector inclining to surface as strongly preferred (Foster 2001). This embodies a striking contrast with proof on confidence and preferences in an impact study conducted in the UK, and also on qualitative outlooks amongst aged people themselves on social care and support other than widespread social care. This may manifest the consequences of a mixture of state-friendly traditionalism, antagonism towards aid organisation because of unenthusiastic imagery and experiences in the pre-war period, and beliefs that disadvantages such as paternalism could be specifically widespread here (ibid, 68). III. Theory of Customer Profitability and Services Marketing in the Voluntary Sector The goal for any economic organisations is to gain sustainable profitability from its assets. In order to make this happen, they are intrinsically predisposed to harvest the most profitable sector of the market in which they are appropriate. The voluntary sector has to also monitor and evaluate the profitability of organisations being addressed with the timing of their dealings with the organisations. Which classification of customer generates the interactions at what instance in the demand cycle? The firm can afterwards apportion its resources on the basis of the profitability analysis (Abram & Hawkes 2003). Measuring the efficiencies of profitability for voluntary sectors would show that not every customer cost the same to serve, simply as not every customer carry the same revenues. Hence all voluntary organization is not uniformly profitable. Some have lesser cost to provide and some carry greater revenues than others. However, there maybe recurring periods when firms require the practically less profitable customers to facilitate the generation of revenue from inoperative capacity, provided that price designated cover the variable costs and have a certain extent of profit available to help cover fixed costs (Poisant 2002). Voluntary organisations have to analyze the dimension and profitability of every customer/sector that is being provided by them. Only then can providers choose the sector combination with maximum overall profitability throughout a demand cycle. They should also obtain the particular customers to deal with at specific instances in the demand cycle on the basis of their profit contribution to the firm (ibid). A widespread misunderstanding is to perceive services marketing as being tantamount with customer services. ‘Services’ are not restricted to customer service. Customer service is just one of the services that improve products. Managers and employees who are product oriented and not customer focused normally perceive services as synonymous to customer service. They perceive service as an aspect that is carried out when a product is returned due to defects or appealed to in order to avoid it from failing (Abram & Hawkes 2003, 85). Some who perceive service as flying saucers that people toss in along with the product are perhaps sales oriented. Voluntary organisations possessing such a service perspective actually do damage to the customer in the sake of service. Their inclination is to suggest a grievance report, which is frequently configured to support the organisation and not the customer. These voluntary organizations may present a toll-free phone number for customers, which is normally created to be a disappointing encounter for the personnel assigned at customer service as well as the customer who could have been making the call for reprisal (ibid). Instances like these represent the often frustrating outcome in voluntary organisations that choose not to be customer-oriented. The established perspective of services is to look at products in two classifications, either service or tangible goods. Occasionally the concept of product is even employed interchangeably with packed and shipped goods but not with service. Not merely has this practice resulted in needless uncertainty, but it has further motivated the defective methods that services and physical goods are distinct and equally unique elements. Analysts have gone beyond as far as to propose that “most product manufacturers and service providers alike are largely service operations” (Quinn et al. 1990, 58). They emphasized that the function of services is crucial for every organization of any type in giving out value in the form of “technological improvements, styling features, product image, and other attributes that only services can create” (ibid, 60). The reality is that every product is created with an array of services; as an issue of extent some products have greater services than others and are hence more abstracts than others (McKean 1999), such as that of voluntary organizations. In order to provide comprehensive and competitive answers to the customer, a voluntary organisation has to recognize and assimilate the service-focused orientation. The service-focused orientation state of mind necessitates an understanding of the essential character of services. The moment the intrinsic attributes of services are evident, it becomes obvious that their repercussions for the customer and the voluntary organisation suggest several prospects and create an array of challenges (ibid). IV. Conclusions The literature examined and professional opinions gathered here offered a clear substantiation that both purposes and weaknesses in the services management of the voluntary sector in UK have importance in this discipline. There is a comparatively abundant literature and an array of empirical evidence evaluating the voluntary sector with its for-profit and public sector equivalents. With this regard, it is now clear about differences in services marketing processes and inputs between sectors. Nevertheless, significantly because of the intricacy and transparency that characterizes social care production; it is difficult to acquire an ultimate conclusion on such important concerns as relative success or competency using accessible data. Furthermore, and partially indicative of this circumstance, there was substantial difference between professionals regarding importance and interpretations. For instance, the innovation purpose and problematic responsibility produced substantial variations of opinion as to the character and substance of the services marketing agenda of the voluntary sector. To a sharp extent, contradictions of interpretation were connected to variations in wider, total assessment of the current functions and path of the social care and support system for aged people amongst professionals. Hence, those who were basically positive about the system’s operations appeared eager to assume that on equilibrium the voluntary sector was contributing to vigorous sequences of innovation, and the weakness aforementioned, while existent, were acceptable, being catered to or at least dealt with. The negativity of some was consequently manifested in their very vigilant and often pessimistic conclusions regarding the voluntary sector’s contributions. More optimistically, the importance of evidence analysed does start to indicate that under particular circumstances, and in some settings, the sector may have inclined to have comparative leverages at the 1980s and 1990s at least. Regardless whether or not such leverages emerges seem to be dependent on two important factors, both decisively manifesting the legacy or resources and associations established over time; primarily, the form of care or support in concern. Specifically, volunteering, a comparatively small scale of operation, sector-particular funding activities, informality and social arrangements relatedness seem to account for the voluntary sector’s services marketing obvious presence and economic strong point in day care and support movements. In residential care, wherein the sector is extremely a minority service provider, various factors emerge. Economies of magnitude and scope, traditionally amassed resources and substantiated track record and access to reserves of significant rituals appear to present economic and social benefits for numerous aged people in this case (Hayden & Boaz 2000). Therefore, the customer-oriented framework provides a means to the evaluation of organizational or voluntary sector performance that, dissimilar from the management-centered framework, will enhance their success. Customer-oriented evaluations provide a great encouragement to organizational members or personnel to enhance quality, trim down cycle period, design innovations and by and large enhance the value-added by each work team (Schmitt 2003). If performance evaluations are designed for each bulb in the internal customer sequence, the organization successfully turns out to be horizontal (equal positions in the decision making process) orientation rather than vertical (management to employees). If every voluntary organisation provides some percentage of service elements as fragment of the overall services marketing process, it motivates them to possess recognition of the character of services. Plainly, with such recognition people can accurately get into the service-focused state of mind References Abram, John and Hawkes, Paul. (2003), The Seven Myths of Customer Management: How to Be Customer-Driven Without Being Customer-Led. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Allen, I., Hogg, D. and Peace, S. (1992), Elderly People: Choice, Participation and Satisfaction, London: Policy Studies Institute. Amin, A. (2002), Placing the Social Economy, London: Routledge. Barker, D. (1993), ‘Values and volunteering’, in J. Davis Smith (ed. ) Volunteering in Europe: Opportunities and Challenges for the 1990s, Voluntary Action Research Second series Paper No. 4, Berkhamsted: The Volunteer Centre. Blackmore, A. (2000), ‘Local government reform and the voluntary sector’, in Dimensions 2000 Volume 1: Income from Government Sources, West Malling: Charities Aid Foundation Foster, V. (2001), The Price of Virtue: The Economic Value of The Charitable Sector, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Hayden, C. and Boaz, A. (2000), Making a Difference: Better Government for Older People Evaluation Report, Warwick: Local Government Centre, University of Warwick. Kendall, J. (2003), The Voluntary Sector: Comparative Perspectives in the UK, London: Routledge. McKean, John (1999), Information Masters: Secrets of the Customer Race. New York: Wiley. Poisant, Jim (2002), Creating and Sustaining a Superior Customer Service Organization: A Book about Taking Care of the People Who Take Care of the Customers. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Quinn, B. et al. (1990), “Beyond Products: Services-Based Strategy. ” Harvard Business Review, March-April 1990, 58-67. Schmitt, Bernd (2003), Customer Experience Management: A Revolutionary Approach to Connecting with your Customers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Read More