Read the case and answer the questions(1 pages) - Essay Example

Canada’s Certec and Bribery Monmouth Canada’s Certec and Bribery Mathew Kwong, the salesperson for Certec high technology,did not have enough information while sealing the $2.7 million deal. The public works minister assistant has asked for a payoff. The minister has taken advantage of Kwong’s naivety and asked for a payoff, which seems to be a norm for businesses coming to look for deals in the Middle East. While Certec had asked a local firm to seal the deal, Kwong came in to do the final part.

Now Kwong is infiltrated and may lose the deal in case he does not facilitate for the money asked by the public servant. Whatever name it is called, this is corruption. It would have been easier and non-criminating if Kwong had let the local firm complete the deal on its behalf. The agent firm could have sealed the deal professionally like it had done before with their foreign companies without bribery featuring anywhere. Kwong should not pay the commission to the servant because it is an act of corruption.

It is not only unethical, the rightful authorities can take action against him if discovered.2. The best way forward is hand the deal back to the local firm originally assigned the job by Certec and reveals every detail about his time with the public servant.3. Canada has risen over years to become one of the top countries to introduce tough laws to fight foreign corruption. The OECD (Organization Co-operation and Development) recommends Canada for its latest momentum in fighting the vice. Ottawa has for the last decade been at the forefront in creating reforms to fight corruption through federal initiatives like Corruption of Foreign Public Official Act.

In its part, the OECD approved an amendment to the law to ensure that the bribery offense also applies to all kinds of companies even where there are huge profits. This is one single most influential amendment made on the law since 1999.The OECD’s anti-bribery group, which promoted the adoption of the OECD convention to fight corruption in foreign officials, also made it clear that a proposed change also extend the country’s anti-bribery jurisdictional scope. This allows the RCMP to prosecute the officials committed by Canadian firms and the Canadians anywhere around the world without necessarily having to establish any connection to Canada.

It would therefore not be a good idea to pay for the money.