StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Pay for Performance why it doesn't work in the Workplace - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The article begins with an analysis to show the widespread payment for performance by managers and consultants involved in setting of payments for workers. This is tied to the belief that “organizations must give the greatest to who perform the best” and “the more closely…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Pay for Performance why it doesnt work in the Workplace
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Pay for Performance why it doesn't work in the Workplace"

Pay for Performance why it does not work in the Workplace The article begins with an analysis to show the widespread payment for performance by managers and consultants involved in setting of payments for workers. This is tied to the belief that “organizations must give the greatest to who perform the best” and “the more closely performance, the more powerful its motivation effect” (p 120). The other believes that the basis for this motivation is behaviorism, which is pervasive and has axiomatic precepts. The other basis for a reward system is Theory X by Douglas McGregor stating that people do not like working and has to be controlled and coerced to get anything done. To show the extensive use of the reward system, the author writes on using rewards to recognize teamwork, monetary rewards for employees for undertaking trainings and gaining new skills.
The author states that rewards often impede than they enhance performance on many tasks with specific emphasis to those that require creativity with the example of Japan and Germany countries that do not use reward incentives and are successful in employee motivation. The other further explores the fact that there are no empirical studies linking motivation to rewards showing poor implementation of compensation systems. In fact, research by Jenkins in 1986 shows no relation between quality performance and rewards (p 124). In a case where incentives were withdrawn, production decreased then after sometime rose to reach a better level than when there were incentives further showing that incentives do not motivate workers for quality or higher productivity (p 124).
The author then delves into the reasons for the failure of incentives including lack of necessity that is the introduction of incentives unnecessarily resulting in lack of any impact on performance. The second reason is secrecy where there is no transparency on each employees earning leading to overestimation and belief of differences in pay resulting in low morale and turmoil at the workplace. Other reasons are lack of match between performances and pay and expense in rewards solved via using noncash rewards. The other reason is too big versus too small incentives where small incentives do not have an impact while large ones are not received by all the workers resulting in failure of incentives to motivate performance. Short-term versus long-term incentives are the other reasons for incentives failure where employees may make decisions countering long-term interests when incentives base on short-term performance. Objectivity versus subjectivity, performance evaluation being a futility, and that pay is not a motivator since money is not the only motivator in life is the other reasons for failure of the incentive system. The author analyzes the different reasons that have showed the need for better working conditions and other factors other than monetary rewards for better performance, but also states the need for adequate and fair compensation. He believes assuming “money is what drives people is adopting n impoverished understanding of human motivation” (p 134).
The author then articulates the problems of rewards at the work after explaining the nine reasons for failure of incentives to motivate employee productivity. That rewards punish employees whose performance are below a set level is the first problem of rewards and is unpleasant, disrespectful, and offensive resulting in failure of incentives to spur productivity. The other problem of rewards is that it ruins relationships, as employees will fail to cooperate aiming to gain the rewards for individual performance reducing the overall productivity. Creativity declines with rewards due to the reduction in risk taking for employees take ion tasks they are asked to do only to attain the rewards. Willingness to do other things to spur quality is reduced by rewards at the workplace. The last reason for failure of reward system and the problem of rewards is that rewards undermine interest in the job and its performance.
The other also points to the fact that “incentive plans do not respond to the extrinsic orientation exhibited by some workers so much as they create this focus on financial factors” (p 141). The article concludes with the assertion that Behaviorism has had a major impact on work through incentive plans and other programs but has not been effective in delivering the desired results. This is evidenced by the failure of the incentive system to spur quality performance at the workplace. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Pay for Performance why it doesn't work in the Workplace Essay”, n.d.)
Pay for Performance why it doesn't work in the Workplace Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1664758-pay-for-performance-why-it-doesnt-work-in-the-workplace
(Pay for Performance Why It doesn'T Work in the Workplace Essay)
Pay for Performance Why It doesn'T Work in the Workplace Essay. https://studentshare.org/management/1664758-pay-for-performance-why-it-doesnt-work-in-the-workplace.
“Pay for Performance Why It doesn'T Work in the Workplace Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1664758-pay-for-performance-why-it-doesnt-work-in-the-workplace.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Pay for Performance why it doesn't work in the Workplace

Workplace Safety

.... The matter was aggravated by the action taken by the two other employees who unreasonably piled on top of Dean and Lehtinen and nowhere in the training is mentioned that dog-piling is a useful measure for securing an individual. This means that OSHA’s claims of maintaining supreme safety measures and giving high-profile security training to the employees are fake and based on empty mockery. Reference: Gustafson, A. (2011). Workplace safety inquiry doesn't fault Oregon State Hospital. Retrieved from http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20110506/NEWS/105060342/Workplace-safety-inquiry-doesn-t-fault-Oregon-State-Hospital... ?Workplace safety: This paper is primarily based on summarizing and critically analyzing the article...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Documentary Expression and Thirties America

4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Pay for Performance

...for performance programs for the employees and that is why many companies opt for it. First, by paying employees for their efforts and performances, employers motivate them to improve their performances in order to earn more (Gerhart & Rynes, 2003). Despite the fact that money is not the only motivator, it is biggest motivator, which means that employees are highly likely to work harder and bring more profits to the company to earn more. Second, by implementing pay for performance programs, attracting and retaining the key talent and top performers became less difficult (Schuler &...
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper

Merit Pay and Performance

...? Merit Pay and Performance My My School My My Teacher 4 September Merit Pay and Performance One of management’s top concerns is to motivate employees to give their best for the organization. Incentives are among the instruments that management can use to promote optimal employee or workforce performance. Towards achieving organizational objectives, structuring pays along performance or merit pays have received much attention lately. But do merit pays work? The work examines the question based on recent literature. Based on evidence provided by the literature, there is good support for the view that merit pays can influence employee performance. However, for merit pays to work there is a need to identify the factors associated... that “a...
9 Pages(2250 words)Book Report/Review

Workplace Job Performance

...? Psychology: Workplace Job Performance Introduction The field of psychological investigation is broad and all encompassing. While popular conceptions of psychology view it in terms of examining psychological dysfunction and human thought processes, there are also a number of specific applications for this science. One of the most prominent applications is that of the business environment. Within this context of understanding, investigation has considered the psychological contributors to workplace motivation. A variety of psychological theories have been advanced that consider the main elements of workplace motivation. In these regards, varying perspectives have...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Land and property Develeopment Diary of the 'credit crunch'

7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Performance Related Pay

...a particular group of needs is satisfied an employee's behaviour will be directed by efforts to satisfy that particular group of needs. Therefore, the employee is likely to direct all the efforts in a certain direction that is in line with his/her felt needs. This can significantly interfere with output. Performance pay and Herzberg's motivation - Hygiene Theory Herzberg 1959 concentrated on studying satisfaction at work. He found out that some factors lead to job satisfaction. He called those factors 'Motivators' while other factors contribute to dissatisfaction. He called those factors 'Hygiene Factors'. He noted that motivators have negative effects in that; lack of achievement...
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay

Global Integrated marketing communications

12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Pay for performance increases job satisfaction

...). Retrieved from http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7labor/08.html Blinder, A.S. (1990). Paying for productivity: a look at the evidence . Washington D.C: The Brookings Institution. Conger, C. (2010, May 13). 10 ways to keep employees happy. Retrieved from http://health.howstuffworks.com/mental-health/human-nature/happiness/10-ways-to-keep-employees-happy.htm Dennis, T. (2002, May 05). Poor quality products imply a poor quality company. Retrieved from http://www.effectiveeng.com/en-021205.html Haleen, C. (2010). Pay for performance remains crucial. Business Issues, 7(5), 34-37. Levin, R. (2004). Employee incentive programs . A Better Practice, 135(5),...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Equal pay and work rights

...Workers rights and equal pay have been issues that human resource departments in almost all companies have to deal with every now and then. Human resource departments try to make sure that their employees’ rights are respected, and they are paid in the best standards possible (Martin 54). Green technologies intend to conduct a research to know if their employees’ rights are respected. The research also intends to determine if employees are contented with their pay. The research will ask employees questions in the form of a questionnaire. It will ask employees if their working conditions are free from Nepotism, sexual abuse, and gender inequality (Worth 15). The questionnaire will also...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Proposal
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Pay for Performance why it doesn't work in the Workplace for FREE!

Contact Us