Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1660059-case-study
https://studentshare.org/management/1660059-case-study.
Russell Hart about Company PoliciesRussell Hart raises serious concerns about Youssef Said in the Middle East Division. In this report about Youssef Said, Russell Hart should include ethical concerns observed to violate company policies. It is important for Russell to differentiate between Youssef Said’s personality and his organizational behavior. It is evident that there is a cultural clash between U.S and Middle East corporate practices. Given Russell’s position, it would be appropriate to note cultural issues and their effect on ethical corporate behavior while using Youssef Said as an example.
The idea is to ensure that every side of the report balances cultural tolerance and ethical organizational practices.Q.2Disclosing everything is a significant challenge in this case. The amount and kind of courage required goes beyond personal interests in the matter. Hart worries that he might jeopardize his position in the company if he tells the truth. On the other hand, doing nothing about his concerns also comes with consequences. Personal advice to Hart is to address the problem positively in his report.
All parties to the issue should be highlighted and the case argued equally among them. Hart should acquire his courage from addressing the best interests of the company as opposed to personal interests.Q.3In the scale of moral development by Kohlberg, Youssef Said fits in stage 5, Russell Hart stage 2, and Bill Andrews stage 3. Youssef Said follows the social contract in executing his job duties and responsibilities. In this stage, a good society is not necessarily ideal or moral. Russell Hart thought processes pinpoint an aspect of individualism.
He contemplates about the implications of his report on his personal position in the company. Finally, Bill Andrews thrives in interpersonal relationships, an observation that resonates with the third stage.
Read More