The case method of stratigic analysis David and Goliath - Essay Example

Luis G. Anaya 26 Jun Rankin MLOS 578 Case Study: David and Goliath ment of Problems Lack of Leadership among the Saul’s army 2.Lack of respect for David, because of his age.3.David is arrogant.4.Philistine vs. JerusalemName the single “Root” and most significant problemThe root of the problem is the conflict between the Philistines and the Israelis. Why is the Root and most significant problem?There are a number of issues in the specific case analysis. For instance, the main conflict is between David and Goliath.

Still, this is only a conflict as the reason these two individuals fight is because they represent the two armies that have come into battle. Guidelines (constraints)There are limited guidelines as both groups of people are willing to fight to the death for their specific claims. In this mode of understanding one recognizes that there must be a strong resolution as the internal elements of both of these organizations is such that their fierce competitive nature necessitates this mode of reconciliation.

Possible solutions-There are a number of possible solutions to the problem. One solution is to have each side choose its strongest member. For the Philistine this would be Goliath. For the Israelites this would be David. Both individuals would then fight to the death. The winner would determine the resolution for the entirety of their population. While this would provide a resolution and avoid significant death, one recognizes that it is largely an arbitrary means of deciding on the solution; for this reason not all participants may be happy with the final solution.

-Another potential option would be to have both organizations engage in diplomacy. While a regular component of international relations in the contemporary environment, during the time of this conflict such actions occurred only in limited form. This then constitutes a major potential option a means of solving this conflict. -Still, another potential option would be to allow both armies to engage in warfare. While this is the most extreme solution it is an option that continues to be implemented through the contemporary world environment.

This solution would be effective in providing a strong and resolute answer to the issue, as the stronger party would have the final say in the matter. Still, the human death toll would be significant. Chosen solutionsThe chosen solution of the root problem is for the Israelis and Philistines to engage in diplomacy as a means of resolving their conflict. Why is it the best solutionOne considers that diplomacy functions as the best option as it determines an amenable solution without bloodshed and death.

This approach functions within the Ansoff management techniques. One considers that turbulence is a prominent area of concern within the Ansoff approach, and this situation demonstrates a great degree of unpredictability. Ansoff recognizes that managers must meet these challenges with an appropriate aggressiveness of strategy. In this sense, the diplomatic approach recognizes that because of the turbulent nature of the situation, a strong and resolute solution needs to be reached. The diplomatic action then will avoid the aforementioned potential of death and allow the conflicting parties to reach a conclusion that will allow them to operate functionally together in future contexts.