Self assessment paper - Essay Example

Self-Assessment From the three tests, i.e. Emotional Intelligence, Tolerance of Ambiguity and Locus of Control, Idiscovered different things I was previously not aware of. Emotional intelligence test sought to test my ability to identify, assess and control personal emotions, those of others and groups’. Individuals with high levels of emotional intelligence have the ability to control their own emotions, those of others and those in groups. Therefore, such individuals suffer from low emotionally related problems.

They can solve issues when they arise calmly, and can handle individuals with poor emotional intelligence. Tolerance to ambiguity test assesses how an individual can tolerate ambiguity of information and behaviour in an open and neutral manner. With the increase in diversity, there is a corresponding increase in the need for people to possess high levels of ambiguity tolerance. This reduces the levels of conflict among individuals and between group members. Locus of control defines cause in response to personal outcomes as well as other events.

People with a high locus of control believe that environmental factors affect their actions and decisions, and they have no control over these factors. On the other hand, individual with low locus of control believe that they have control over their lives and that no external factors have influence over their lives. The tests revealed different results about my emotional intelligence, tolerance of ambiguity and locus of control. I thought my performance on the three tests would confirm my personal opinions on these qualities.

Contrary to this however, and I concluded that nobody is perfect, even from an own self-evaluative analysis. There was no supervision of the tests; as such, I could have lied or manipulated the results to suit my personal perception. This however, I did with utmost sincerity. While I scored highly in the emotional intelligence and locus of control tests, I poorly tolerated ambiguity.  According to the results, I scored lowly on the Locus of Control test. This means that personally, I believe in possession of the control of my life.

Thus, even if other external influencing factors exist, they have no significant effect in my life. I cannot tolerate ambiguity as the results revealed. According to the results, I had a low level of ambiguity tolerance, which means that I have not fully adapted to diversity of human nature, especially with the growing level of globalization. Potentially, this can affect my relationship other people due to conflicting information analysis and interpretation. However, I have a high emotional intelligence, which means that I have a high ability to identify and control my emotions.

The two tests, though testing a particular element of my personality had differing results; emotional intelligence. The online test indicated that I had low emotional intelligent, while the text test results indicated that I had high emotional intelligent. These results significantly contrasted. I took the tests almost at the same time, which means that I gave close answers to closely related questions. According to the online results, I had high control of my emotions, but had poor control other people’s emotions as well as those of a group.

It is difficult trying to control a person. Equally, it is as frustrating as people prefer independence and self-control. However, this does not explain the differences in the results. A close comparison of these two tests reveals quite a number of differences. There were more details in the online test, covering a wider area than the text one. This might give an explanation as to the differences in the results. The online test also suggested ways of improving my emotional intelligent, which could have explained the difference.

With the understanding that I was not perfect in all areas, the online test gave me the opportunity to learn ways of improving my emotional intelligence. This would adequately help me in avoiding problems associated with poor emotional intelligence. The emotional intelligence assessment results differ and at the same time agree with my personal view about my emotional intelligence level. According to the text results, I have a high emotional intelligent level, while the online results indicate that I have a low emotional intelligence level.

However, online results agree with my personal opinion that I can control emotions nicely at personal level, but cannot do the same in groups and to other people. I find managing other people’s emotions as welcoming conflicts. While some people are free to receive guidelines from another person, others are totally in opposition. They believe that if people tried to give them any form of guidance, it is a way of manipulation, which leads to conflicts. Since tolerance of ambiguity scores measure, my attitude toward change and risk, and my results indicates that I have a high level of tolerance, then, it means that I can take high-risk careers and can successfully manoeuvre from any risky situation.

Jobs such as entrepreneurship, aviation, mining, among others with a very high risk level suits me best. My locus of control is consistent with my perception in this area. Personally, I believe that I have full control of my life and that no external environmental factors have any control over my life. Subsequently, my management style would be more personal oriented than organizational oriented. If I were a manager, my biggest concern would be on individual performance and how an individual can achieve results without having problems with the organizational effects on individual performance.