Argo, Zero Dark Thirty, Burning the Future: Coal in America - Movie Review Example

Film Summary Argo The movie Argo was released in the year This movie is a faction political thriller adapted from book the Master of Disguise. Summary In the year 1979, the Iranian revolutionaries invaded the American embassy situated in Iran. Furthermore, it is believed that 56 American were taken as hostages. Nevertheless, 6 Americans accomplished to escape and took shelter in the house of Canada Ambassador. At the time of Iranian revolution and seize of control by militants of the American embassy situated in Tehran, Tony Mendez tried utmost to rescue American diplomats by creating false Hollywood film production. Several armed militants were conducting explorationsto kill any suspected members of American diplomats. It is supposed that its matter of time to identify six Americans and take them as hostages. Additionally, Tony Mendez offered a solution which is viewed to be as potentially dangerous and unique. The unique solution was to enter in to Tehran by posturing as a Canadian film producer. Mendez created movie named Argo which is based on various media production and casting calls. Moreover, Tony Mendez launches dangerous operation by receiving green light from supervisors for creation of the movie to rescue 6 Americans. The Central Intelligence Agency of United States is the only sole agency discussed in the film Argo (Carleson, 2014). At the time of current scenario in political sentiment, the portrayal of a government Central Intelligence Agency in Argo comes out as a positive. In the era of different political viewpoints, the film Argo effectively reveals the contemporary apprehensions about the dependability of American intelligence and diplomacy. The movie is primarily based on Iranian hostage crisis. The film Argo created sense of anger on the people of Iran. The movie stated that the people of Iran are tremendously violent and used to publicly hung traitors. Furthermore, a lawsuit is supposed to be filed by group of Iranians. The French lawyer who is covering the case stated that the lawsuit is initiated to defend Iran. Isabelle Coutant-Peyre also detailed that the film Argo is distorting the image of the country. Some of the viewers also believed that the movie is based on political or proclamation against the revolution of Iran. The film is somewhat accurate to portray the issue of Iran hostage crisis. Furthermore, the real story is based on bravery about the American ally and diplomatic collaboration. Most of the historians and film aficionados believe that the film Argo is quite close to demonstrate the issue of crisis at the time of Iranian Revolution. The portrayal of the role of the Canadian embassy has been minimized in the film. It is believed that the film Argo is biased on the heroic of Central intelligence Agency in competition with the menace of Muslims. The film Argo provides great footnote to the history with abundance of entertainment value, mystery, tension, artistic responsibility, narrative arc and technical expertise. Moreover, the films is viewed to be as seriously executed drama fashion and ingeniously written story about little known historical chapter about Iran-American relationship. It is recommended to be must watch movie. Zero Dark Thirty The film Zero Dark Thirty was released on 19 December, 2012. The film is faction action thriller written by Mark Boal and directed by Kathryn Bigelow. Summary The Central Intelligence Agency operative agent Maya was assigned a job to Pakistan to track down one of the most wanted terrorist in the world. It is believed that for many years, a selected squad of military operatives and team of intelligence were devoted and working secretly for common goal. The prime goal of those elite members is to catch and execute Osama Bin Laden. Moreover, Maya believed that trust of finding most wanted terrorist can be found by contribution in punishing duress towards the detainees. For 10 long years, Maya was obsessed and single-minded to uncover the trust of finding Osama Bin Laden. Eventually, in the year 2011, the hard work of Maya paid off, as Navy Seal team of United States of America was sent to follow the route of CIA rookie agent to capture Al Qaeda leader. Finally, the hunt for al-Qaeda terrorist was successful in May 11, 2011 (Jeansonne, 2014). The agency discussed in the film is Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA is regarded as an independent Government agency of United States which is predominantly accountable for national security intelligence. The gathering of circumstantial evidence of Osama Bin Laden has been put by Central intelligence Agency as under substantial surveillance. The film purports to embellish the assassination of al-Qaeda leader. This purports generated significant political argument. Some of the screenwriters and filmmakers believe that the movie does not make any journalistic accuracy and is viewed to be as anti-torture. Many viewers believe that fruitful result can be occurred without application of detainee program and acts of inhumane torture. There was sensitive information that was pivotal for the completion of movie. Furthermore, this created sense of fear among the people that release of any information could lead to risk towards future operations and national security. Judicial Watch, the group of conservative watch group was denied to have access to the material related to the production of the film. This forced them to file a lawsuit that is believed to be fulfilled under the Act of Freedom of Information. The lawsuit was filed against the Central intelligence Agency and Department of Defense. The court finally ordered to have access of information from the filmmakers and Central intelligence Agency in august 2012. There were also rise of question by Government regarding the legality of the cinematography. The film is accurate to portray the involvement of Central intelligence Agency. The film effectively presented the plan devoted by the agency team to capture Osama Bin Laden. The film is biased only towards the devoted Central intelligence Agency agents that were eager to give their lives for the sake of finding Bin Laden. The film is dealing with implausible politicized subjects and was successful to provide a true exceptional effort which is effectively combining with the qualms and questions. The film provides a quiet, constant and confident story with ending known to everyone and makes it utterly vital, exhilarating and thrilling. Burning the Future: Coal in America The film burning the future: Coal in America was released in the year 2008. This is a documentary film focused on the influence of mountaintop removal mining. Summary The effect of mountaintop mining has been focused in the film. In this scenario, heavy machinery was used to scrap away mountain ridges which can help to have access to the coal seams. This process is viewed to be as faster than that of traditional methods of mining. The film scrutinizes the explosive forces that resulted in to conflict between the inhabitants of West Virginia and the Coal Industry. Moreover, it is confronted by local activists watch and coal-based energy policy of United States. These activists watched that people used to praise the availability and forget the huge cause of destruction (Bigelow, 2014). Additionally, it is faced by government and toxic ground water that conciliates the residents and industries which effectively determines the strength of personality and purpose. The strength is their dubious fight to help nations by saving families and mountains for sustainable future. Some of the environmental problems faced due to mountaintop mining have been debated in the film. The Environmental Protection Agency has been discussed in the film. In the year 2005, the agency of Environmental Protection has stated that more than 6.8 percentage of land in forest would be heavily affected by implementation of mountaintop mining. There have been rise of concerns regarding the negative outcome of the mountain top mining process. This process leads to the fading of environmental regulations. Moreover, it can lead to devastating floods, toxic groundwater, extinction of animal species and disfigured mountain ranges. This problem has been further abetted by indifferent politicians. The film tried to argue that it is not the fault of coal industry for the creation of entire chaos. The film discussed that it signifies the unresponsive position of the politicians that assisted the occurrence of the crisis. The viewers applauded the visualization of Novack about the negative consequences of mountaintop mining to the future of America. The film is accurate to portray information from agency which would make viewers know about the possible damaging concerns. The portrayal of the Environmental Protection Agency is not biased, as writer/director tried to provide vivid explanation about the adverse influence of the process in future. The film provides motivating and thoughtful outlook about the controversy. The writer of the film tries to expose the truth behind the execution of extraction of mountaintop coal. The various tools have been revealed to everyone to deliver cleaner prospect. David Novack, the director suggested that consumers do not recognize the importance of burning coal. The burning coal is pivotal towards the production of electricity which is beneficial for consumers. The coherent argument constructed by Novack presents vivid explanation about the disastrous impact of the process on environment which became convincing by the publicity of coal industry. References Bigelow, B. (2014). A People’s Curriculum for the Earth. New York: Springer. Carleson, J. (2014). Work like a SPY. Stamford: Cengage Learning. Jeansonne, G. (2014). War on the Silver Screen. New Jersey: Pearson. Read More