Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Justice System Book by Neubauer and Fradella - Coursework Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The paper contains a description of 7 and 8 Chapters of "America’s Courts and the Criminal Justice System" book authored by Neubauer and Fradella. The author also describes the three ways someone can become a judge and identifies which of the pathways results in the selection of the best judges …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.1% of users find it useful
Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Justice System Book by Neubauer and Fradella
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Justice System Book by Neubauer and Fradella"

Chapter 7 & 8
Q#1: (Chapter 7) illustrates how defense attorneys can be subject to informal sanctions and rewards. The chapter also highlights how variations in cooperation with the other actors in the courthouse by the defense attorney can affect the defendant. Is a defendant better served by a hard fighting attorney “the gambler” or someone who works within the established norms?(Neubauer and Fradella) Which would you want if you were the defendant? Explain your position.
If I were a defendant, I would like to have a defense attorney who works within the established norm-within the system. The assertion by Neubauer and Fradella (170) that defense attorneys’ working within the set norms and in cooperation with the court community do not best represent the interests of the client is in my opinion incorrect and fallacious. It is worth noting that, this interaction or cooperation between a defense attorney and other courtroom workgroups does not erode the best interests of a defendant (171) but rather, betters the results for a client. This is because; such a defense attorney gets access to helpful, important information from the prosecutor, which he/she would otherwise have no access to. As a client, a defense attorney who takes a cooperative posture may help thee attorney get favorable bargains-plea bargains-, and would, in addition, shield a client from being penalized as a result of the defense attorney’s hostility. Neubauer and Fradella (171) argue that, the so called “gambling” attorneys may harm their clients since they may, in a bad way push the judges’ and prosecutor’s hand into handing a client long and unreasonable sentences.
Further, an attorney working within the set norms and in cooperation with other courtroom groups are considered good counselors and sober advisors since they have the capability to predict and ascertain the reactions of the court community with regards to certain cases. This gives them an upper hand when it comes to offering a client advice with respect to how to proceed with a case. This implies that, such attorneys have the ability to develop realistic and strategic approaches to cases on the basis of knowledge and experience. Moreover, in retrospect to what many studies have advanced, attorney’s cooperating and interacting with other courtroom groups have the motivation to defend their clients vigorously and have the capability to go to trial where and when, in their judgment, it seems necessary.
Q#2: (Chapter 8) describes the three ways someone can become a judge. Which of the three pathways do you believe results in the selection of the best judges? Explain your position.
My position with regards to which selection process-executive appointment, election or meritocracy selection-, is best is based on various factors. Therefore, it is difficult to conclusive confirm which criterion is generally the best, but on the basis of various interpretations I can take a position. For instance, on the basis of the quality of judgment a judge would dispense, I would hold the position that the Missouri Bar Plan or the meritocracy selection process is the best process for the selection of quality judges. Borrowing from the arguments advanced by judicial reformers, it is important to complete make courts free of politics. This is because; elected or appointed judges tend to take the populist posture while deciding cases. The merit collection process tends to cure these ills and in some way incorporate elements of the other-election and appointed-processes (Neubauer and Fradella 194). This process has increased the participation of legal professionals and has significantly reduced the influence by political parties in the selection process.

Works Cited
Neubauer, David W., and Henry F. Fradella. America’s Courts and the Criminal Justice System. 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning, 2010. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Coursework”, n.d.)
Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Coursework. Retrieved from
(Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Coursework)
Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Coursework.
“Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Coursework”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Justice System Book by Neubauer and Fradella

Criminal justice system

...). In addition, America’s processes and procedures in determining the innocence of an individual especially within the court rooms significantly vary from other international countries. Training of personnel to take up positions, functions, and responsibilities within criminal justice department vary significantly from international training despite the fact that in both cases same skills and knowledge are imparted on trainees. Modernization and civilization have significantly changed the criminal justice system within USA. For instance, through modernization and civilization, USA has developed very sophisticated machines...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Criminal Justice System Structure

... Topic: “Criminal Justice SystemCriminal Justice System in a Glance: The criminal justice system in a country is a combination of all the law enforcement agencies that supports all the criminal justice functions. The criminal justice departments are comprised of several governing bodies such as law enforcement bodies, law courts, correctional institutions and other departments that are linked with criminal justice functions (Friedman, 1993). The main aim behind...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

The Criminal Justice System

...? Criminal Justice System The Criminal Justice System College There is a vast difference between traditional policing that were followed some decades ago in U.S.A as that of community policing that is being practiced now . Further, American legal system is confronted with the diversity issues as America is a nation of immigrants and has a good chunk of minority population. Further , there arise legal confront between congressional power to legislate and the Supreme Court of U.S.A finding some legislation infringing the rights granted under the constitution, and this has resulted in legal...
10 Pages(2500 words)Term Paper


...?Running Head: CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM School: Topic: Criminal Justice System Lecturer: presented: Introduction America is comprised of people from different racial and ethnic backgrounds especially as a result of slavery and massive European immigration. The races consist of the Native Americans, whites, Hispanics, Latinos and African Americans. The Latinos are of Spanish origin and are immigrants while the African Americans originated from slavery. As a result of the mixed races, there are a lot of allegations of racism in all aspects of the lives of the Americans. Racial discrimination in the criminal...
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper

American courts and the criminal justice system

.... If this was the case then the ruling on death penalty violated the Eighth an Fourteenth Amendments. In a five to four decision the court decided that the death penalty ruling did constitute to cruel and unusual punishment and thus violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment. The justices articulated their views on over two hundred pages of concurrences and dissents. The issue of race came up with concurrences on the arbitrary nature on death penalty passed on black defendants. The other two cases consolidated together with the Furman v. Georgia were Jackson v. Georgia and Branch v. Texas2. Jackson v. Georgia Jackson was an African American man who had escaped from a work gang only to go and commit...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

US Criminal Justice System

...level. In the absence of the federal courts, the federal government would have to rely on the state governments to help accomplish its goals. This would not only be a tedious process but the effectiveness and level of support would differ from state to state. Thus, the existence of a federal system of courts helps ensure that all the states adhere to the federal government’s plan equally and effectively. Moreover, it helps ensure a certain level of uniformity in legal procedures across states. References Bohm, R. M. (1987) “American Death Penalty Attitudes.” Criminal Justice and Behavior. Volume 14, pp. 380-396. Carp, R., Stidham, R. & Manning, K....
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

The Criminal Justice System

...System and the Criminal Justice Process The main players in the criminal justice system include the courts, police, and correctional facilities (Randolph, 2005). These components of the system serve to deter or prevent crimes by arresting, trying, and subjecting criminals to punishments. While courts, as presided over by judges and juries, serve to establish whether parties bear criminal responsibility by seeking justice and unearthing the truth, police departments work toward maintaining law and order and providing related services...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Ch.5 - Book - America's Courts and the Criminal Justice System by David W. Neubauer, Henry F. Fradella

...Discretionary Decisions Discretionary decision making occurs in the criminal courts by prosecutors who decide whether and how to proceed with cases based on their assessment of the evidence and the likelihood of a conviction under various charges. Judges exercise discretion primarily in the sentencing decision. Although prosecutors and judges in criminal courts have a considerable amount of autonomy in their decision making, their discretion is not significant. Instead, it is structured in voluminous measures depending on the types of cases before the court, the reviewed decisions of the cases made earlier as well as the indirect community pressures....
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Ch.12 - Book - America's Courts and the Criminal Justice System by David W. Neubauer, Henry F. Fradella

...of justice is apparent since the rules limit the nature or kind of evidence that courts may accept and the purpose for which the evidence may be used. Criminal rules of evidence also have the effect of broadly defining relevance of facts while relaxing the common-law prohibitions on witness competency. There are rules that require courts to exclude relevant facts merely because of their propensity to prejudice, confusion, delays and to mislead (Neubauer & Fradella 454). For instance, evidences of other crimes committed cannot be used to show conformity to the crime behavior under review while such evidences can prove motive. Despite...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Ch.15 - Book - America's Courts and the Criminal Justice System by David W. Neubauer, Henry F. Fradella

...good behaviour while in jail (positive rehabilitation). Liberal criticism of indeterminate sentencing law is based upon the fact that people who have committed similar crimes usually serve different number of years. This discrepancy creates an ambiguous sentencing system. Conservatively, indeterminate sentencing is based on the principle of rehabilitation. Evidence in the 1970s revealed that rehabilitation had very little impact on the convict’s future decisions with respect to crime. The rehabilitation system also focused on the convict, neglecting the crime and the victims. There was no sense of punishment, retribution or deterrence. Indeterminate sentencing were once very popular but it was however...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Coursework on topic Description of 7 and 8 Chapters of Americas Courts and the Criminal Justice System Book by Neubauer and Fradella for FREE!

Contact Us