Journal of Ch 9 and 10 in , and review 5 court cases - Book Report/Review Example

However, it is essential to have each state stick by its meant rules since all rules differ by state. The preliminary hearings differ in states but all hearings are done in an open court always in front judges who have the mandate to provide prosecution and any probable proceedings using the charges used against defendants. For instance, the speedy trial Act offers a defendant an opportunity for preliminary hearings. It is essential to realize that prosecutions begin their hearings by sufficiently presenting any evidence that is inclusive of interview processes.

These are meant to offer the judges behind the cases enough time to gain reasons that can be used in believing the defendants reason for standing trial. Another important lesson is that defense attorneys have been given the mandate to have access for cross examining witnesses as well as offer an opportunity of presenting arguments, evidences, motions, and the judges presiding. Florida v Riley 488 U.S. 445 This court case was about a sheriff in the Florida County who received a tip from a man that was believed to grow marijuana in a piece of land that was twenty meters squared big.

This property was in the rural areas of Florida and the police did not see into the greenhouse up to the behind of the building. This green house was behind the residential of the defendant and could not be traced especially since the sheriff used an airplane to circle the entire place. The case that was issues before the court included whether it was essential to servile the interior of a partially covered greenhouse in the interior especially where the surveillance was of a residential backyard.

This surveillance happened in a height of four hundred meters above that constitutes of the greenhouse. This is according to the readings provided by Justice White of the Florida Supreme Courts. Although the Supreme high court made their decisions, it was reversed by the Supreme Court and added up a four-vote plurality. California v Greenwood 486 U.S. 35 This court case had the supreme court in the united states of America hold proceedings about the fourth Amendment that did not prohibit searches that were done even without warrants.

This case also was because of the involvement of the issues about garbage seizure as it was left for a collection at homes .Specifically, it was about Jenny Stracner who was an investigator in the department of police in the Laguna Beach. This case was about a stacner neighbor who happened to receive a claim that he was supposed to collect garbage bags that were left by residents such as Greenwoods even in the their curbs. The decision by the court lay within the fourth Amendment that stated that the warrant claims were not necessary since the particular party did not reasonably add to any privacy.

Kyllo v United States 533 U.S. 27 This court case was about proceeding s related to thermal imaging items or rater devices that were in most cases used in monitoring heat radiation especially when a person home was in favor of a search. This case was under the fourth Amendment and indeed required or needed a warrant. This was because the case was about Marijuana and was actually convicted and later reversed simply because the court lacked any warrant. Smith v Maryland 442 U. S. 735 This court was proceeded by Justice Brennan who was later joined by Justice Marshall.

It was about the