Nobody downloaded yet

Men in Black How the Supreme Court is Destroying America - Book Report/Review Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The author of this book review "Men in Black How the Supreme Court is Destroying America" casts light on the American Constitution and the system of government. It is stated that each branch of government—judicial, legislative, and executive—must have their purpose and their goals clearly defined…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.6% of users find it useful
Men in Black How the Supreme Court is Destroying America
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Men in Black How the Supreme Court is Destroying America"

Download file to see previous pages According to Levin, the men in black—the justices of the Court—have seized power and are destroying the America that we know and love. His arguments are sensible, engaging, and accurate. He fulfills every goal he sets out.
Throughout this book, Levin describes many examples of judicial interference in the lives of Americans. The book is largely written for an educated audience that is interested in law and politics. He argues that justices have become political actors who sit in judgment of all policy questions and impose their will on elected officials. This is unconstitutional in his opinion. The author asks how courts obtained such power over the lives of Americans. It has happened via a slow, creeping effort that largely began during Roosevelts New Deal era and gained steam in the 1960s and 70s (135).
The answer is that the Supreme Court has simply taken such power for itself. Nowhere in the Constitution is the federal judiciary expressly given the authority to interject itself into every facet of federal—and state—operation. Federal courts have accumulated their power under the rubric of judicial review. (23).
The author here makes an excellent point. Courts have claimed that the Constitution gives them an inherent power to ensure that laws meet the rules laid out in the Constitution. The Constitution nowhere gives the Court that kind of power, it has simply been seized. Rather than having the legislature decide what laws can and cannot be made, courts have decided that they are in the best possession to do this. The truth is that courts are there to interpret the law and ensure it is correctly applied, not to overrule elected officials. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Men in Black How the Supreme Court is Destroying America Book Report/Review - 9”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1412222-book-review
(Men in Black How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America Book Report/Review - 9)
https://studentshare.org/law/1412222-book-review.
“Men in Black How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America Book Report/Review - 9”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1412222-book-review.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Washington, U.S. Supreme Court
...?Question Facts In the case of Davis v. Washington, U.S. Supreme Court, (2006) where McCottry had been assaulted by Davis the boyfriend who had later on fled the scene. McCottry was supposed to testify for charges of felony violation of domestic order. This led to using hearsay from the 911 call recording that was made by McCottry despite Davis objection of not doing it. This led to him being convicted under the clause of confrontation on the sixth amendment as the 911 call was enough to have him in jail for the decided time. Issue The issue before the court in the current case is whether Davis could still be convicted since McCottry did not testify against him in court. The court was forced to use the 911 call recording... that was from the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Supreme Court
...PROJECT The Supreme Court has been involved with the admissibility/suppression topic of eyewitness identification as recent as April, 2006. The most recent case was heard before the Wisconsin Supreme Court re State v Hibl. In this case, a witness accidentally saw the defendant in the court hallway before the trial. The defense argued that this was a suggestive situation, and, therefore, would promote unreliable identification. The prosecution maintained that the spontaneous meeting increased reliability, saying the issue should be decided by the jury. The trial judge suppressed the witness identification, and a mistrial was also granted. Upon the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Supreme Court
...The Apocalypse of Adolescence By Yuliya Having read through the article en d "The Apocalypse of Adolescence", several conclusions came to mind. First, juveniles should almost never be given the death penalty, as this provides virtually zero learning in relation to moral guidance and the receipt of understanding as to what is right versus what is wrong. The death penalty takes their young lives and forever changes them, without the opportunity to be rehabilitated by competent sociological or psychological professionals. However, when the case is similar to the one in the article, the juvenile death penalty may be imposed, especially when the children show no regret for their actions. The problem, however, appears to lie in whether...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Supreme Court
...Supreme Court Opinions The principle responsibility of the U.S. Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution. It has thefinal say in settling legal arguments and determining the meaning of laws thereby setting national policy. The Justices write majority and minority opinions following a decision. These fall into four categories, unanimous, divided, very divided and per curium. Unanimous decisions are written when all nine members of the court vote the same way. The Chief Justice (John Roberts) assigns any Justice the task of writing it or may choose himself. Sometimes, if the case has many nuances involved, he may have opinions from two Justices. In...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
U.S. Supreme Court
...U.S. Supreme Court For this particular essay paper, I have chosen to discuss the successful nomination and confirmation process that Associate Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan underwent as a nominee of Pres. Barack Obama. Looking into the history of the person and her climb up the justice ladder, one will see that she is truly worthy of the position that she now holds. She overcame adversity and secured her confirmation based upon her work merits rather than her gender. She is in effect, a female success story for a new generation. Originally serving in the presidents cabinet as his Solicitor General, Ms. Kagan became Pres. Obamas official nominee to replace retiring...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Supreme Court
...from how it had been allow people from same sex to enjoy certain rights and privileges which they were deprived of earlier. It therefore means that, after the issue being contested in the Supreme Court for Nine Circuits, the court finally found no reason for depriving people of same sex their right to marry (Adam, 2013). This decision was based on the non-originalist view that looked into the other precedents keenly to allow the constitution make amendments in favor of those who wanted to have same sex marriages. References Adam, L. (2013, June 26). Supreme Court Bolsters Gay Marriage With Two Major Rullings. The New York Times...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
Supreme Court
...Supreme Court Supervisor June 27, Supreme Court The argument for an originalist perspective to interpretation of the constitution is rational because of the advantages that the theory offers to the contemporary and dynamic environment. The fact that no written constitution, or any other law, can anticipate and provide for all possibilities is one of the justifications for a non-originalist perspective. Laws, such as the constitutional amendments, were developed to remedy immediate and anticipated problems and transition through the amendments’ existence have realized developments, some of which are beyond expectations of the developers of the amendments. Relying on the letter of the amendments would therefore be retrogressive... Court...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
Supreme Court Decision
...of the Political Science of the Teacher 14 July Doe v. of Intrusia- Supreme Court Decision As per the wisdom and informed opinion of this Court of Law, the City of Intrusia no way violated the search and seizure protections enshrined in the Fourth Amendment by intercepting the text messages of the accused Joe Doe, and these text messages are aptly admissible in this Court as valid and credible evidence. This Court has ample reasons to set aside the appeal made by the accused, Joe Doe. The Fourth Amendment in its word and spirit intends to protect “The right of the people to be secure”, in the condition that they are subjected to “unreasonable searches”....
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Supreme Court
...Supreme Court case of Korematsu v. U.S Complaint The complaint in this case was that Korematsuwho was an American of Japanese descent was wrongfully evicted from his location to an internment camp. He complained that this violated his constitutional rights and hence refused to move as the order requested. This led to his arrest and conviction based on disloyalty and disobedience to the country and its laws. Brief summary of the facts At the peak of World War II, President Roosevelt signed a presidential executive order 9066 which demanded that all American-Japanese people be evacuated and taken into internment camps where they would be closely monitored. The aim of this order which was named the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Supreme Court
... DD Month YYYY ESSAY POLITICAL SCIENCE Introduction The American government is divided into various armswhich perform different functions. The arms include the judiciary, legislature and the executive. Every branch of the government has distinctive functions which they perform independent of the other branches. To achieve this each has their specific roles which they perform as led by their leaders. All branches are guided by the American constitution which details out the rule and regulations governing the Americans. This paper explores the functions of the supreme court, its roles as well as Federalism and its effects to America (R. Dye, Zeigler and Schubert). SUPREME COURT The supreme court carries out various functions... which...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Men in Black How the Supreme Court is Destroying America for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us