Nobody downloaded yet

Norrie, in his case comment, The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 - partial defences to murder (1) Loss of control Crim L.R. 2010. 4. 275-289, analyses and critically evaluates the defence of loss of control. Briefly identify the key arguments advanced by - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
This followed the 2006 report inherently formulated by the Law Commission1. The report recommended the revision and redrafting of the partial defences to murder in…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.5% of users find it useful
Norrie, in his case comment, The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 - partial defences to murder (1) Loss of control Crim L.R. 2010. 4. 275-289, analyses and critically evaluates the defence of loss of control. Briefly identify the key arguments advanced by
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Norrie, in his case comment, The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 - partial defences to murder (1) Loss of control Crim L.R. 2010. 4. 275-289, analyses and critically evaluates the defence of loss of control. Briefly identify the key arguments advanced by"

Download file to see previous pages In its report, the Law Commission cited a number of issues that needed address. The commission also provided guidelines on how the issues could remain dealt with. The foremost issue identified was the fact that the aspect of provocation had no clear guidelines for its implementation and raised vast public complains such as gender bias3.
Under this new law, the partial defence to murder of loss of control has its basis on a number of aspects. These aspects are the core components of loss of control. These components must remain adhered to when making decisions of cases of this nature. The components are discussed in detail below.
The partial defence to murder because of loss of control should remain based on a qualifying trigger. In this case, the reaction of a person towards an angering situation is measured against the reaction of another person with a normal degree of self-restraint and tolerance. The second individual should be of a similar age and sex as the first person. Section 54 provides for this off the act.
For the validity of the defendant’s argument, the loss of self-control should not have been sudden. The cause of the course of action in response to the qualifying trigger should not remain based on revenge. In this case, the defence states that the defendant acted based on loss of self-control. The prosecution faces the task of proving that the defendant did not experience a loss of self-control. The prosecution can only raise this issue if the presiding judge is on the opinion that the evidence put forward by the prosecution does not satisfy the concerned jury4.
The basis of qualifying triggers is on anger and fear. A person can be said to have lost self-control because of fear attributable to serious violence from the second party. The loss of self-control can also remain based on anger that is attributable to a justifiable situation of being wronged. These situations bring about the anger trigger and the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Norrie, in his case comment, The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 - Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1694625-norrie-in-his-case-comment-the-coroners-and-justice-act-2009-partial-defences-to-murder-1-loss-of-control-crim-lr-2010-4-275-289-analyses-and-critically-evaluates-the-defence-of-loss-of-control-briefly-identify-the-key-arguments-advanced-by
(Norrie, in His Case Comment, The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 - Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1694625-norrie-in-his-case-comment-the-coroners-and-justice-act-2009-partial-defences-to-murder-1-loss-of-control-crim-lr-2010-4-275-289-analyses-and-critically-evaluates-the-defence-of-loss-of-control-briefly-identify-the-key-arguments-advanced-by.
“Norrie, in His Case Comment, The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 - Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1694625-norrie-in-his-case-comment-the-coroners-and-justice-act-2009-partial-defences-to-murder-1-loss-of-control-crim-lr-2010-4-275-289-analyses-and-critically-evaluates-the-defence-of-loss-of-control-briefly-identify-the-key-arguments-advanced-by.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Explain the terms span of control and control loss. Are these concepts useful in understanding the design of organizations
Every company tends to offer the customers more advantage in any way that the other does not so as to gain competitive advantage over the contemporaries in the market. This has toughened the work for businessmen. On the other hand, customers find themselves in a rich market.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Explain the terms span of control and control loss. Are these concepts useful in understanding the design of organizations
Yasgoor and Bressler (2008, pp. 50) defines span of control as the direct number of employees which a manager supervises or who directly reports to the manager. The principle of span of control states that a limited number of subordinates should be overseen by the supervisors because monitoring the tasks of the subordinates is easier when number of subordinates is small (Meier & Bohte).
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Infection Prevention and Control in Defence Healthcare
In fact medical science in general and the nursing profession in particular have given much attention in recent years to this oft neglected area of clinical practice. This paper will discuss not only the nature and causes of infections, but also the efforts for infection prevention and control with special reference to defence healthcare.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Counselling in Loss Assign 4
From trying to stop the change." The changes that occur in an individual’s life when they lose a significant other are often drastic even when anticipated. Each individual tends to cope with bereavement in a different manner; and may take different periods of time to move through their loss (Lendrum and Syme, 2004; pp 51).
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Critically Evaluate the Progress (or otherwise) Made with Regard to the Implementation of the Coroner and Justice Act 2009
The present Act integrates these two issues, in addition to significant alterations to the law of data protection, and to the authorities of the Information Commissioner. Sections 52, 54 and 57 of the 2009 Act create alterations to the law of homicide. Section 52 alters the definition of partial protection to murder of decreased duty.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Total and partial loss Marine Insurance Act 1906
Being well aware of the perils of the sea and the risks it poses to oceangoing vessels bearing valuable cargo, the development of marine insurance against losses due to oceanic misadventures is a natural development for a country like the UK.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
Gun control (Self defence low)
The debate over the issue of gun control within the United States has been a lengthy controversy. However, this particular claim has not proven to be a successful use of a gun within a home. In
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Critically discuss the extent to which the defence of loss of control in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 compares to the defence of provocation
f the Court of Appeal permitted individuals accused of murder to reuse evidence that their victims’ infidelity towards them was the cause of their losing control and killing the victims.1 Prior to the enactment of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, it had been possible to
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Define the term 'Constructive Total Loss' for the purposes of the Marine Insurance Act 1906. What are the difficulties with this definition Use case law examples to support your arguments
Identifying the complexity in evaluating whether seizure of case cargo, an important component of insurance by criminals involved in piracy and demanding ransom before release results in a genuine and legal claim for
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Assessment question Norrie, in his case comment, the coroners and justice act 2009- partial defences to murder (1) Loss of control crim L.R. 2010. 4. 275-289, Briefly identify the key argument advanced by Norrie in his analysis of this defenc
It is not obvious that one can easily level a law suit against another person and easily win the case. The plaintiff must go extra miles to gather evidence which are beyond reasonable doubt and lay them before the jury to get his justice
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Norrie, in his case comment, The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 - partial defences to murder (1) Loss of control Crim L.R. 2010. 4. 275-289, analyses and critically evaluates the defence of loss of control. Briefly identify the key arguments advanced by for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us