Download file to see previous pages
In this respect, clients can pay in full or incur partial payment processes to obtain the same products1. From this perspective, the willing buyer-seller technique relies on participant’s ability to come to an agreement on which method to apprehend a decision.
When a debtor makes partial payment to a creditor, who has the right to end the agreement? In an event that both decide to settle before completion of the contract, who takes responsibility? The belief that the law binds a promisor to his promises raises many questions on the boundary of such aptitudes. Agreements are very important; nevertheless, the main question remains how to address disputes in contracts2. According to promissory estoppel, any creditor who formally or informally notifies a debtor of forgiving a commitment has no right to claim the same. In the case of Orlando and Kate, the latter chose a system of payment for buying a car worth $2500 by compensating in double instalments of $1250. Certainly, this pegged to her income that could not allow her pay a lump some for the same product. The mutual agreement between the two; however, did not materialize after Kate lost her job hence failing to pay for the second instalment. Worried about making losses, Orlando settled on an additional $625 and a bottle of wine as a token of appreciation from Kate. Notably, this marked the end of their agreement of the sale and hence termination of the contract. Nonetheless, Orlando after hearing of Kate’s luck in finding another job intends to seek for the additional fee. Notably, Kate has no obligation to pay the remaining amount considering that Orlando agreed to new terms. The Law of promissory estoppel guards Kate against Orlando’s idea to demand more money. On the other hand, the doctrine of part payment debt assumes that partial payment of a debt does not hinder the creditor from fully enforcing the intention to settle. From this
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
500. For advising O’Brien regarding his obligation towards Julia, Parsons and Winston, the following issues have to be discussed. An offer indicates willingness to form a contract on the basis of certain terms, and with the intention that it should be legally binding on being accepted (Barry, 1992, p.
The Hague-VisbyRules require that the carrier provides a seaworthy ship; and handles the goods with care (Lex Mercatoria 2003). A number of exceptions are granted which would apply to the “Seagull”. However, the carrier may not be able to rely on these exceptions if it is found that due diligence was not applied in the carriage of the goods.
There are a number of issues arising in this case as follows: whether; email communications and ignorance of terms of contract by a party voids an agreement; either party breached the contract – Lily by withdrawing her membership fee and IndyBooks by poor site maintenance and eventual withholding of Lily’s monthly earnings; Ryan has any basis to claim breach of the contract; contract dispute resolution mechanisms in the contract document can be implemented; the High Court has the jurisdiction to hear the case, the summary judgment on Lily’s claims has any basis in law, and; the flowery messages on the company’s website amounted to an invitation to treat.
Which type of ELT textbooks is more appropriate for present needs: the "authentic" or "non-authentic" reading materials The trend seems to move away from the grammar-based pedagogic content of non-authentic text in favor of authentic text, which simulates the real world outside the classroom.
.. to [imprisonment] for any term not exceeding ten years..." Interpreting the foregoing provision in the case of R. v Kennedy (Simon)  4 All E.R. 10831, the court ruled that a defendant cannot be held criminally liable for manslaughter where the defendant was merely involved in the supply of a controlled drug which drug was subsequently self-administered by the deceased to whom it was supplied freely and voluntarily.
First we shall consider the contract between Jayne and Swot Encyclopaedias (SE). It is assumed on the basis of the presentation of facts that SWOT ENCYCLOPAEDIAS are not denying what they said to Jayne about making a 4,000. Swot Encyclopaedia's likely argument upon denying her the money would be the lack of agreement on the basis of their subjective intention i.e.
The purpose of this report is to study the case and advise Jack regarding as to the possibility of him avoiding the consequences of the contract he had with the bank. Having researched the facts of the case
Peter wishes to demand specific performance of the contract between him and David regarding the house as he intends to live, at the very least, the stipulated 10 years of the contract. In doing so, Peter needs to affirm the contract exercising his right of election as a result of the breach of contract.
as said that consideration revolves around the concept of benefit to the promissor, or detriment to the promisee, thus the requirement is mutually exclusive.
An important principle is that consideration must be sufficient and need not be adequate that is it must be something
The importance of contract law can also be evaluated by complexity of legal propositions and legal scenarios in both of its practical functions and in its jurisprudential functions.
If we look at the English Law, it is
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Contract Law Problem Question"
with a personal 20% discount.