Border security issues (week 1) - Essay Example

Law Border Security Issues Issue #3: Morality When a person exposes a friend’s wrong doing or a family member involved in wrong doing, there are always those issues that arise. In most cases, the issues that people tell their friends or family members as privacy issues are never balanced against conflicting interests or beliefs. In most of the cases there are conflicting interests because the legislators and courts fails to recognize that privacy may be implicated. According sociologists such as Erving Goffman, people tend to have a sense of loyalty towards their friends or members of their groups (Burns, 2002).

Such sense of loyalty is the reason that contributes to people’s desire to manipulate the impression they want from others. There are a few advantages that come from exposing a friend or family member of actions that seem morally wrong. For example, if a wife discovers that her husband sexually abuses one of their children, she may find this an extremely difficult choice make, whether to report him to the police or not. Exposing such an offender to the authorities would be the right thing to do for her children because failure to do it could lead to another assault.

A friend who exposes his or her friend for bullying others provides a clear step towards eliminating other bullies in schools or societies. Under the law, a parent has the duty to protect the children. The court may view it as a crime when a parent fails to take reasonable steps to protect the children. The advantage of exposing the offender in both cases is that the party reporting is not liable for the crime. Exposing a person on the wrong also provides the person who reported with a sense of control of the situation.

The problem with exposing a friend or a family member of their wrong doing is that it is traumatizing for cases where there is a victim involved in an assault. In cases where the report needs to go to a trial, a lot of information comes out and both parties may not want confidential matters becoming a public matter. Exposing a person who has committed a wrong does not necessarily mean that the person gets punished or in other cases sued (Richards & Swanger, 2006). It is frustrating to see that no one may respond to the problem as one desires.

Based on the advantages which outweigh the disadvantages given, people should expose those who are doing wrong, but should do it in a way that is also respectful to the perpetrator.ReferencesBurns, T. (2002). Erving goffman. London: Routledge.Richards, H., & Swanger, J. (2006). The dilemmas of social democracies: Overcoming obstacles to a more just world. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.