Threat and Risk Assessments - Essay Example

reat essence to establish a universal body that puts into consideration the diversity in agencies, jurisdiction and countries, however, how difficult it is. Strategies such as a universal framework that is flexible in taking care of threats and risk assessment need to be implemented. They have different requirements and can be enhanced through charts and diagrams that are simple to analyze and comprehend. They also use common terminologies that are well defined. This paper, therefore, provides an analysis of logical assessment of intelligence problems through structured analysis and sequentially discusses the significance of using that method basing evidence from well-researched materials and sources.

One of the key challenges law enforcement agencies are facing within crime intelligence is the confusion in definition of two terminologies, which include threat assessment and risk assessment (Calder & Watkins, 2007). Shading more light on this will help these agencies understand what threats and risk assessment entails. To beginners, threat assessment involves a cross extermination of the nature and intensity of a particular threat that can cause harm. This extermination further entails identification of the probability of the threat to occur and the extent of harm it is likely to cause in any case it occurs.

On the other hand, risk assessment involves taking into consideration that the threat will occur and that the magnitude of the harm it is likely to impose is so large (Calder & Watkins, 2007). Lest one understands the difference between the two, more mistakes and confusion of intelligence assessments of one applying for the other are still expected. The main reason for conducting a threat and risk assessment is to provide decision makers with a tangible reason for the occurrence of undesirable, present and potential events and evidences that the identified event is likely to occur.

Additionally, it suggests some of the dangers that may result suppose the