Defamation Act 2013 - Essay Example

the 2013 Defamation Act transformed this because now the claimants have to present full evidence to the court to show that the person's expression him/herself was actually violating the claimant’s rights. As of October 2013, most High Court judges had thrown out two dozens of cases brought forward by wealthy people or foreigners about claims published mostly by the media. This has curbed the behaviour of people of exploiting England courts. Throwing out most of the cases, Judges have described claimants' endeavors as an abuse of law or process, claiming that they were harming the England and Wales reputation by making their country seem like they do not respect peoples’ freedom of expression. Allowing such cases to move on endangers unequal and needless interference with freedom of expression. Judges today are stressing that claimants have to present considerable harm to their repute in England courts in order for the suits to succeed. Otherwise, it would be a waste of time to take your claim to court. This is a significant ruling because it now prevents people from making use of the law when the matter is not that important.