Law versus Morality as Regulators of Conduct - Essay Example

Law versus Morality as Regulators of ConductThe aspect of law and ethics are usually entwined, and an individual has to be morally upright in order to fit in the society that has numerous laws and regulations (Shavell, 2002). However, individuals tend to overlook the moral aspect of various laws, and thereby break some laws. In our instance, an individual has the freedom to choose from breaking the law, owing to the lack of supervision or strictly adhere to the law, even on condition that breaking the law would not harm any individual.

In my perception, though the conditions may be suitable to break such laws owing to the fact that it would not hurt anyone, it will be critical to obey implemented traffic laws and stop. The rationale behind this is that individuals have a tendency to learn various habits which may become difficult to eliminate (Shavell, 2002). As such, failure to follow traffic rules in such an instance would make an individual duplicate that habit in another instance and this may compel such an individual into unwarranted litigation.

Breaking the law in such instances in critical conditions such as saving the life of an individual in serious health challenges may be morally allowable. However, since it is evident that such an individual is not in such a critical hurry, it would be unjustifiable to break the law. Besides, individual instincts have a significant influence in our behaviors and the way individuals conduct themselves in conditions where there is no supervision (Shavell, 2002). As such the human instincts may make an individual feel guilty, owing to such incidences.

As such, to omit such guilt, it will be advisable to stop and follow the rules. ReferenceShavell, S. (2002) Law versus Morality as Regulators of Conduct. Harvard Law School. Web: http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/shavell/pdf/4_Amer_Law_Econ_Rev_227.pdf