Court of Appeal of New York Cases - Essay Example

What happened before the filing of the suit is that the plaintiff had been ordered to do the work anew. This plaintiff did not do it wholly but only did part since reconstruction would require the demolition of the whole structure. The plaintiff went ahead and asked for payment which the defendant denied. This denial of payment thus led Jacob and Young Inc. to file this suit. Here, the courts had to resolve whether the defendant’s argument was feasible. This is because the plaintiff had presented evidence that the materials used in construction were of the same quality as that the client had specified although not from the manufacturer the client had stipulated.

The court finally decided for the plaintiff after judging that the materials used in construction were in fact of the standard quality the client had specified although from a different manufacturer. The decision was affirmed as a whole. The rule of law is that “If the difference in value is greater than a measure of allowance, then compensation is to be given.” (Shourie, 50). The court reached its decision by looking at the plaintiff’s facts and ruling that they were appropriate.