Nobody downloaded yet

Civil Right vs. National Security : Padilla/Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Civil Rights vs. National Security Case Study Padilla/ Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld [Full name] [Student Registration Number] Introduction Since the compromise of national security witnessed during the September 11 attacks on US soil, tough measures to counter terrorism continue to find their way in national security policies inside and outside the country…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.6% of users find it useful
Civil Right vs. National Security Case Study: Padilla/Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Civil Right vs. National Security : Padilla/Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld"

Download file to see previous pages Questions on the legality of the government’s actions in countering terrorism emerge in the form of compromise on civil rights and liberties that the constitution is strongly vocal in guarantee. In several cases before the courts, the federal government has been found in contravention of the provisions of the constitution, which raises questions on the practicality of providing national security without compromising civil rights (Picarelli 1). In the following discourse, two cases before the courts facilitate in the illustration of the difficulty of implementing some of the most decorated milestones that country boasts of in countering terrorism. Padilla v. Rumsfeld and Hamdi v. Rumsfeld took place in the similar period when the US was facing the aftermath of the September 11 attacks and the nation was enforcing Authorization of the Use of Military Force Act, with a series of court battles on infringement of constitutional rights. Case Summary and Facts Padilla v. Rumsfeld Jose Padilla, a US national serving in the US military operations in Pakistan during the period when 11 September 2001 terrorist attack occurred and he was taken in as a material witness. The arrest was dramatic since it took place as Padilla stepped off his flight from Pakistan on 8 May 2002, with the federal warrant of arrest for a material witness acting as the legal explanation. Details of the arrest changed and the applicant was suddenly facing charges of acting as an Al Qaeda agent. Legal position for his incarceration advanced from a material witness to “enemy combatant” and the federal government found reason for treatment of the applicant as any terrorist warranting the firmest action from the federal government such as indefinite imprisonment. It implied that the applicant could not access legal rights provided for in the Constitution while the government held the opinion that he was such a high profile threat to America’s national security (Baird, Darmer and Rosenbaum 264). Six months after his incarceration, his attorney made an application for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which was declined on the grounds of the authority of the president to execute the “enemy combatant” principle. As such, the court found that the war on terror was still an issue and that the court could not allow the application as it would compromise the federal government efforts to counter terrorism on American soil. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit subsequently received the appeal that found the decision of the District Court improper. The held that despite the commander-in-chief having such powers as exercised in the case, such treatment could not be meted on Americans incarcerated on American soil. Such transfer of charges from civilian to military authority without access to legal resources infringed on the constitutional rights. In the court’s ruling, Padilla was released but only from military authority to civilian custody. The case proceeded to the United States Supreme Court for determination of the matter if the Authorization for Use of Military Force from Congress was an applicable as the circumstances of the case proved. In the appeal, the matter before court ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Civil Right vs. National Security Case Study: Padilla/Hamdi vs Study”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1401535-padilla-vs-rumsfeld-hamdi-vs-rumsfeld
(Civil Right Vs. National Security Case Study: Padilla/Hamdi Vs Study)
https://studentshare.org/history/1401535-padilla-vs-rumsfeld-hamdi-vs-rumsfeld.
“Civil Right Vs. National Security Case Study: Padilla/Hamdi Vs Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1401535-padilla-vs-rumsfeld-hamdi-vs-rumsfeld.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Civil Right vs. National Security Case Study: Padilla/Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld

Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld 548 US 557 (2006) Case Study

.... It is good that there are now reforms in place to ensure that military officers do not act with impunity. For example, investigations have been conducted against those who have been pinpointed as perpetrators of torture and human rights abuses. Regulations on greater transparency have been put in place. Human rights advocates have spoken clearly against torture. What needs to be changed are not individual policies, but the over-all mindset that renders human rights prescriptions optional, rather than sacred Case References: Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942) Hamdan v. Rumsfeld 548 US 557 (2006) Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004) In Re Yamashita 327 U.S. 1, 11 (1946) Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950)... of Ex Parte Quirin, 317...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Ford vs Detroit Electric Car

...?Ford vs, Detroit Electric car The dream of developing an electric car has been pursued by different companies for many years. The debate on development of an electric car can be traced back to the agreement between Thomas Edison, and Henry Ford to work together in making electric car the main mode of transportation in America. The case study on Detroit electro cars portray the differences of approaches by two companies, which are set to achieve the same end; to develop an electric car. While Detroit Electric has been extensively involved in research and development of a viable electric car, in Ford moors, this has been an elusive dream not yet realized. While Detroit Electric Company capitalizes on its technological...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Make vs Buy

...? Make vs. Buy decision Grade (24th, Jan. Make vs. Buy decision Question a: There are four alternativesthat are open for available to Liquid Chemical. The first alternative would be that of allowing everything to remain as it is without changing anything. Alternative A: Maintaining the status quo This alternative will entail Liquid Chemical continuing with its operations as it was doing before, without enlisting the help the Packages, Inc. the relevant costs applicable in this alternative are: Cost of materials= $700,000 Cost of labor=$ 500,000 Overhead costs=$468,500 Administrative overheads=$225,000 Total costs for Alternative A: =$1,893,500 Therefore, the total costs applicable for this alternative...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

National Security Case Study

...by the terrorists. "Why was the national terror alert system lowered from "severe general" to "substantial" just before the attacks"2006. According to the BBC 2005, the secret service was just pretending by heightening the national terror alert system yet it had no real intentions of protecting the British civilians. This it, reports, was so that the controversial Prevention of Terror Bill could be passed. True to the argument, after the Bill was passed in March 2005, it took only two months to downgrade the terror attack from "severe general" to "ordinary substantial". Then soon afterwards, the security forces demonstrated that they could not even prevent the bombings. The service has...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Download Movies vs Renting Movie

...for no cost and the hardware with which to do so is becoming relatively cheap as well. The disadvantages, however, are also significant. Firstly, this practice is illegal and could even result in jail time under the right circumstances. This risk really is not worth it just for a free movie to watch. Also, the download speeds on file sharing software vary considerably, making it very difficult to know when the download will be completed. This means that the person will never know when he or she will finally be able to view the movie, which is a huge inconvenience. In addition, there is no way to know if the movie that the individual is attempting to download is in fact that movie. Often times, viruses and other malware...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

John Leonard Vs. Pepsi Co

...Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc. Contract Law The case of John R. Leonard vs. PepsiCo Inc. is a very interesting one due to the nature of events that occurred. Although we know the vivid details of what transpired, it leaves a lot to ponder over. John Leonard sued PepsiCo for breach of contract because they did not honor a supposed offer to gift a Military Class Harrier Jet on the submission of 7,000,000 Pepsi points. Based on the facts, the first question that comes to mind is what features would constitute a binding contractual agreement. The features which substantiate a valid offer are mutual and reciprocal intent of agreement, legality of form, capacity to contract, legality of form, legal purpose etc. Based on this...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Facebook vs Twitter

Undoubtedly, malicious virus attacks appear to be the most potent challenge to Facebook. Due to this problem, thousands of people lose access to their accounts. In addition, computer hackers intrude into Facebook IDs and steal users’ confidential information. The “Facebook’s mission is to give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected” (as cited in Reagan, 2009). However, growing governmental interventions and regulations including ban raise potential challenges to Facebook in some countries like China. Hence, the company has to struggle a lot to make its mission achievable. Market competitors like Twitter and Myspace are turning out to be a significant threat to Facebook. Last bu...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

National Interests Vs Human Interests in Takastand

...National Interests Vs Human Interests in Takastand Takastand is currently facing many economic, political, national and human rights issues. For instance, the government officials do not allow the non-government organizations to work for the benefit and welfare of people on smooth and favorable conditions. On the other hand the government has found punishing some of the members of NGOs very strictly. They have even rendered them death sentence. Hence the political or governmental dispute in the state has become more and more related to fundamental human rights. It is now high time to consider an International Conference for ensuring human...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Holland Sweeterner Company vs. NutraSweet

...Holland Sweetener Company vs. NutraSweet There are a number of reactions that Vermijs should expect NutraSweet to respond to the Holland Sweetener Companys entry into the European and Canadian aspartame markets. It is not going to be an easy task for NutraSweet to curb the competition that is brought about by Holland Sweetener. The fact that they have a new formula and technique of producing aspartame will make them a big threat to their dominance in the market. The main challenge in this case will be to create a market entry barrier so that Holland Sweetener will have a hard time in penetrating the marketing. This can be achieved by making sure that all their patents are extended in both Europe and in the United States...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Federal vs State Law

... for keen observers. On an appeal to the Supreme Court, it issued arguments based on historical and religious value of the monument. It stated that the monument only showed that the nation recognized the Ten Commandments' historical meaning. Thus, through the Chief Justice, the Court held that the establishment clause did not bar the existence of the monument. The court on constitutionality of the monument, further stated that even though the Commandments are religious, having such content consistent with messages akin to religious doctrine does not violate the establishment clause. In sum, both of these cases show supremacy battles between the states and the federal government due to conflicting laws. Nonetheless, in most cases... Name)...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Civil Right vs. National Security Case Study: Padilla/Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld for FREE!

Contact Us