Alternative dispute resolution methods - Essay Example

Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods The essay discusses the methods of settling the disputes that are related to understanding or interpretation of rules, regulations, point of views, and treaties. These methods are highlighted below (Kegley).MediationIn this method of conflict resolution, a third party jumps in to resolve the issues. The third party brings the two conflicting parties to common grounds. Mediator helps the involved parties to understand the point of views, interests, and interpretations of each other to resolve the matter.

This method helps solving the problems in convenient manner. This method is applied in courts where time of the candidates is saved with the aid of court mediation. Mediator tries to settle the issues between parties with allowable legal options with practical considerations. Mediation is a professional business and mediators may charge money for spending their time in resolving the conflicts. Good OfficesThis type of conflict resolution comes into play in case of peaceful conflicts in which the two parties have been negotiating with each other with mutual interest understood clearly.

The third party will provide the conflicting parties a good office to settle their disputes on neutral grounds. This method doesn’t involve the third party itself for resolving the matter. The conflicting parties interface with each other directly to have their issues resolved. ConciliationThis type of conflict resolution involves the third party to suggest unbiased opinions and suggestions to deal with the issues in sensible and peaceful manner. However, the decision is made by both parties.

Each conflicting party wishes to have the final verdict in the solution. Third party will enable the conflicting sides to reach to a conclusion. The role of third party is just to assist in negotiations without favoring any party. At the end, the solution will be mutually agreed proposed by the parties containing third party only in the background. ArbitrationIn this method of conflict resolution, the disputing parties hand over the charge to third party to decide the fate of the conflict. The parties don’t negotiate with each other directly in this case.

They tell their stories and arguments independently to the third party. The role of third party is played by a ruling board that decides the matter. The decision of ruling board will be final and both parties will have to accept it in any case. AdjudicationThis method is practiced in the formal courts in which both conflicting parties fight for their cases. The jury is legally allotted by the government that is responsible for making any decision between conflicting parties. The jury will hear the arguments from both sides and decides the matter accordingly.

The decision of the court is final and can’t be challenged. The parties are bound to obey it. This approach is very much similar to Arbitration with the latter being informal while Adjudication is a formal consideration. ConclusionAfter considering the various conflict resolution methods, we conclude that we can adopt several methods for resolving the disputes between different groups by using specific methods after judging their applicability. Work CitedKegley, Charles W. Update Edition for World Politics: Trend and Transformation, 2013-2014 Update.

Cengage Learning, 2013.