Co-conspirator Rule and Application in Child Sexual Abuse Case - Essay Example

When defending a case and the evidence has been offered at trial, you must stand against it that it is hearsay and no evidence exist to prove the words or actions, further, the defender should argue that the co-conspirator might have been coached or is having ill motives towards another co-conspirator. When prosecuting a case at trial, you must be ready to defend it as admissible since according to the law the rule of co-conspirator exists, so long as there is independent evidence showing that the conspiracy exists and the two conspirators were present.

Individual statements or actions made to medical practitioners for reasons of treatment are allowed as reliable hearsay. It is believed that children seeking treatment see doctors hence they tell them the truth about their problems (Utah bar journal, 2002). Child sexual abuse cases sometimes take years to go to trial and by then the child might have forgotten or she might no longer remember clearly the details of what happened since she might have made tremendous progress in recovering from the trauma and maybe she no longer wants to be reminded. Sometimes even parents may not want the children to be reminded about the bad situation they encountered earlier. Read More