Jury Science in the Courtroom - Essay Example

If it does give one side an advantage, does the side with the most money have a better chance of winning? 

In the American legal system, jury selection specifically points out the tools of social science and expertise to select an expert on the subject as per the policy in vogue when the counsels are having the opportunity to examine jurors at the time of trial. It is the prerogative of the lawyers and the judge to choose the fit and appropriate people to be on the jury (Barber, 1994).

The selection criteria of jurors aim to find out the citizens who are eligible to examine in a particular case of law under oath. The objective of selecting jurors is just to have effective voting preferences (Barber, 1994).

The initiation of a scientific way to select jurors amongst the appropriate people to be examined in a particular case pending before the competent court of law initially created sensation in the legal fraternity. Though the juror selection process is an effective way to come to the conclusion it does not receive appreciation from the American people in general and the legal fraternity in particular. The old system of selecting jurors was doubtful since it was based on nepotism and favoritism. Those responsible for selecting jurors had their own ax to grind thus making the whole process of selecting jurors biased (Barber, 1994).

The present process of selecting jurors is based on the survey conducted by different but reliable groups of society, the rating of the people chosen for the juror. The relevant information is gathered through a detailed questionnaire. It helps out the attorney and the judge to select the right person for the right job (Barber, 1994).