Consumer Law Issues - Essay Example

College Consumer Law There are presently over 490 million consumers in Europe and their spending represents more than half of the Union's gross domestic product (GDP). Consumers are vital to economic expansion and job creation in the EU. Regardless of this fact in the EU there is a wide lack of consumer assurance when it comes to shopping across the borders. Consumers ought to be as confident as possible when making purchases in both own and foreign countries and this can only be attained by a well planned and implemented consumer protection laws and regulations. Thus it is the duty of the leaders from both the EU and the respective member sates to ensure that their people are well protected and safeguarded against any harm that may emerge from the marketplace. Consumer protection law is a part of law that regulates personal law relationships between consumers and the firms that sell those products. Consumer protection policies are designed to guarantee fair competition and the free exchange of truthful information in the market arena. These laws are established to prevent businesses that take part in fraud or particular unfair practices from getting an advantage over their competitors and can too offer additional protection for the inferior and those incapable of taking care of themselves. Consumer Protection policies are a type of government directive that protects the welfare of consumers. For instance, a government might require businesses to unveil detailed information concerning products; mainly in areas where safety or health of the public is a concern, like food. Consumer safeguarding is associated to the thought of "consumer rights" as well as to the creation of consumer organizations that assist consumers put together healthier choices in the marketplace. Misleading and deceptive practices are the world over. And the plan is to make the consumers to pay more than they ought to for goods and services, or make them pay for items they don't need. Irrespective of if its misleading advertising, erroneous assumptions, or absolute lies, the outcome is alike: they may pay over what they ought to for what they should get. The interests of consumer can also be protected through enhancing competition in the marketplace that directly and indirectly offer good and services to consumers, steady with economic competence. Consumer protection may too be asserted through non-government organizations and persons as consumer activism. Consumer protection deals with a wide variety of issues, such as privacy rights, product liability, unjust business practices, deception, misrepresentation, and some other consumer/business interactions. These laws handle credit repair, debt repair, goods safety, service and sales deals, bill collector ruling, turnoffs, pricing, utility consolidation, personal loans which may guide to bankruptcy and much more. In Europe, some particular restrictions have been positioned on the standard of party autonomy. Such restrictions naturally apply in circumstances where there occurs a qualified extend of disparity between the parties in regards of their individual negotiating powers. A significant example of such a state of affairs occurs when a business sells products to a consumer and the consumer is deemed as being in an inferior position than the business. Therefore, the jurisdictional regulations in Europe require that the vendor can only take legal action against the consumer in the state where the consumer is dwelling; whereas the consumer can at all times sue the seller in the consumer's state of residence. The EU is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life of its residents. Additionally to direct action to defend their rights, the Union guarantees that consumer interests are put into the EU legislation in every relevant policy field. Because of the sole market and the sole currency open operation borders, as utilization of the internet and electronic commerce develops and as the service division grows, it is significant that the almost 500 million people in the 27-nation Union gain from very similar high level of consumer protection. Kutin, (2005) says that to assess the legal changes to consumer protection in the EU community, it is crucial to understand the setting, culture and standards of each the new Member States previous to political and economical change that occurred. The fresh consumer protection structures established have mainly been owing to the necessity to harmonize and meet EU membership standards. A consumer traditions needs to build up and consumer protection may be strong just with a combined EU endeavor of all the member states. The European community was created to form a new and common market for the entire member states (Knoblochov, 2006). Nevertheless, in the initial stages of integration of the community, consumer protection concerns were absent, although they were of basic significance for the completion and functioning of these common and the internal market. Even though there was no cite of consumer protection in the Treaty instituting the European Community furthermore the Community had no powers to budget any resources in this field, it became clear to the executive representatives at the start of the 1970s; originally at the Paris Summit in 1972, when the leaders of state and government demanded for political action in this field. Soon after, the European Commission set up the preface programme for a consumer protection of the European Economic Community and information policy in April 1975 (Knoblochov, 2006). This paper, which afterward became the basis of the consumer legislation for the Community, summarized five basic consumer rights. In accordance to this programme, every consumer was permitted to the protection of their safety and health, the safeguarding of their economic interests, compensation for spoil, information and training, and representation. The programme as well stipulated that consumer policy was cross-cutting and the intents would progressively be incorporated into explicit Community policies for instance into the economic policy, the environmental policy, the general agricultural policy, the transport and energy policy, among others. This groundwork programme was pursued by other programmes, although the real realization of a Community consumer policy did not disembark until the Single European Act and later adopted legislation. The Single European Act that declared quite decisively that the internal market ought to be created by the close of 1992, was the initial document in key legislation to utilize the term 'consumer'. Article 100a which is now Article 95 of the Treaty strengthened the European Commission to suggest measures for protection of the consumers, the foundation of which was intended to be a high degree of protection (Knoblochov 2006). Consumer protection was not initiated as a different policy till the Maastricht Treaty that laid the vital basis for it in Article 129a which is now Article 153 and visualized it as a wholly fledged Community policy. The Article granted that the Community ought to contribute to the strengthening of consumer protection. This guided further regulation impression that was reflected in the acceptance of numerous new measures. The succeeding change to principal law, preserved in the Amsterdam Treaty, as well entailed definite changes in the area of consumer protection. In the reestablished Article 153, it is now specifically stated that the Community might make a take some part to protect the safety, health and economic interests of consumers and to support their right to education and information, and to arrange themselves so as to defend their interests. Additionally, this Article too took account of the necessities emerging from consumer protection in the meaning and implementation of further Community policies (DTI. 1987). A competent internal market requires an EU-level policy on consumer protection. If the sole market functions fine, it inspires consumer confidence in cross-border deals. However individuals have to be confident they have enough accurate information previous to making purchases and have clear legal rights when deals go wrong. A common set of regulations guarantees people the essential level of protection they need in such deals. Though, at European level, consumer protection was checked before the completion of the Single European Act and additional changes to prime legislation. This regulation happened in the extent of internal market guideline in areas where diverse in the principles of consumer protection were an impediment to the internal market. Consciousness of the importance of consumer interests, at a general extent and as concerns the effects of protection of consumer on the internal market, varies from state to state. How consumer protection is planned is too highly dissimilar. This may be attributed not merely to the customs of the particular countries or regions, and the disparities between old and fresh Member States, however also to the reality that this legislation is a matter of minimum harmonization. Due to such minimum harmonization, individual States can carry on or adopt more rigid legislation beyond the structure of Community's common law. The recently approved legal provisions, that contain maximum harmonization, characterize a noteworthy shift in direction. Since 2005 a review of the consumer acquis started, with the intention of which is inter alia to discover a suitable advance to the law of consumer protection at European Union level. This has been accompanied by specific changes and introductions of new regulation into the initial policy as new and complicated issues rise day by day. For instance, On 14 May, the European Commission made public the findings of an 18 month examination into the online sale of airline tickets. The Commission directed the pan-European study with 16 European state authorities, who jointly examined 400 websites for airline tickets selling for observance with European consumer protection laws. This is the primary such "sweep" examination to be done by the Commission that does not have straight enforcement powers in connection to legislation on consumer protection. Nevertheless, by coordinating the examination with national authorities of law enforcement, and through threatening to name and put to shame the defaulting airlines, the Commission has, for the first instance, applied its powers of influence to take not a direct enforcement action on consumer protection matters. In September 2007, the European Commission started a "Sweep" or universal checks of websites that sell airline tickets all over the EU Member States. The Sweep centered on three main practices including clear pricing of tickets that is any extra charges like taxes ought to be displayed with the overall ticket price, two was the availability of fare like any restrictions to the availability of a deal must be clearly indicated and just contract terms. Out of the 447 websites checked throughout the Sweep, more than 50% were established to have some "irregularities". Subsequent to the Sweep, those websites that were established not to wholly respect consumer protection regulations were required by the related national authority and demanded to offer explanation on their dealings, or modify their practices (Bygrave Lee A & Dan Svantesson, 2001). The Commission gave out a 'mid-term' report in April 2008 showing that 50% of the websites which had been established to have irregularity in September 2007 had changed their actions. The ultimate report clarifies that enforcement act; resulting to the correcting of websites and their practices - has currently been fulfilled in 85% of cases, however there remains a undermanned group of around a dozen firms that are still offering the Commission real cause for worry. This is certainly a significant step in consumer protection across the Europe. This examination is the initial time that the Commission had applied the Sweep enforcement practice to direct a consumer protection survey. There are numerous European Regulations checking on consumer protection for instance, the Regulation on deceptive advertising and the Regulation on unjust terms in consumer deals. These instruments of European legislation are formulated into national laws and are consequently enforced at nationwide level. It is consequently national authorities that entail sanctions against businesses found to be violating consumer protection regulations, not the European Commission. On the January of 2004, the EU set up stricter rules to evoke of faulty products. The European Commission now gets over 1 000 notifications of hazardous or unsafe products every year. The major products at risk include toys, followed by electrical devices and lighting equipment. Around June of 2009, the Commission intends to publish an 'Enforcement communication' meant at intensifying pan-European enforcement of laws that protect the consumers. Additionally, the Commission as well hopes to establish an industry extensive agreement to maintain standards and carry out another Sweep later on this year. It seems that the Commission is firm in its struggle for consumer protection and websites selling online airline tickets are just the start of the Commission's campaign. In December 2007, the EU debarred a chain of unjust commercial practices. This included misleading advertising and hostile selling practices such as harassment, oppression and using excessive influence (Europa, 2009). The new order gives consumers similar protection from prickly business practices and scoundrel traders if they buy from the shop in their neighborhood or from a website in a different EU country. Another case occurred on 26 November when the European Commission established a public session on the existing of present EU law on package travel that is dated back to 1990. The Commission will investigate possibilities of expanding the protection regulations to a broader range of travel products presented on today's market. The growth of the internet and low-priced carriers has revolutionized the manner in which consumers arrange their holidays. With 23% of EU consumers and more than 40% in nations like Ireland or Sweden, design their own "dynamic packages". It is repeatedly not obvious if these visitors are protected by the existing EU protection regulations (Geraint, 2007). Present rules governing jurisdiction on consumer protections are resolved to a great extent by applying geographical criteria. One tries to identify the real places in which a variety of activities have happened. For example, in the case of deal, one asks questions, like: where was the deal entered into Where were the dealings obligations violated The difficulty in the circumstance of Internet transactions is that such kinds of questions are frequently hard to answer decisively. Over the Internet, there is deficiency numerous of the points of reference that are made use of from the physical, off-line arena. The Internet is a means that basically ignores nationwide boundaries. In this reverence, it may be referred to as borderless (Geraint, 2007). Another priority issue for possible EU undertaking is expanding the principles of consumer protection regulations to cover licensing agreements of items such as software downloaded like antivirus, games, or other licensed substance. This was declared by the commissioners' of EU in their agenda. Such licensing ought to assure consumers similar basic rights like when they buy a good: the right to receive a product that functions with fair commercial circumstances. Software firms could be held accountable for the security and efficiency of their products, if a fresh European Commission consumer protection suggestion becomes law (Espiner, 2009). Widening the scope of consumer would force the companies to keep up update services for these contracts further than the contractual term and eventually limit the variety of offers. Therefore, Software firms have extensively argued against taking on the responsibility for the security and effectiveness of their code. Linux kernel creator Alan Cox in 2007 said to a House of Lords Committee that nor proprietary or open-source creators ought to be held responsible for their code. In December 2006, the EU introduced a fresh programme for consumer protection for the period 2007-2013 with a sum budget of 157 million (Europa, 2009). This had two main objectives; one to guarantee a high rank of consumer protection, especially through enhanced evidence, better discussion and better illustration of consumers' interests and two to ensure the effectual use of consumer protection regulations, notably by the enforcement cooperation, awareness, education and redress. In putting into practice this programme, the European Commission centers essentially on means to improve existing legislation. Although it too wants precise action to facilitate consumers to acquire mortgages for buying homes or to utilize retail banking services in a different EU country when they choose to (Walker, 2001). Concurrently, in numerous cyberspace transactions it is frequently relatively hard to identify the whole parameters of the transactions, such as the identity, residence and other class of the parties to them (Campbell, 2007). For instance, an e-mail address is not at all times a reliable pointer of where an individual or organization is located or established. These reservations are exacerbated through ambiguities and loopholes in the present rules on jurisdiction of consumer protection. Such rules were established largely from the pre-Internet period and take minute or no account of deals that take place in a digital context. Therefore, their application to deals and trade entered into and completed over the Internet is frequently problematic. Without a doubt, empirical evidence proposes that the present jurisdictional rules for consumer protections in Europe regularly do not result in helpful protection for consumers in the many instances more so in the event of disputes that are cross-border legal, predominantly when little claims are at stake. The most of consumer disputes regard to small claims and court proceedings in such cases is typically so time-consuming and expensive for consumers. Therefore, in the long term, it is enviable to set up and make use extra-judicial organs for resolving, fast and cheaply, inter-legal disputes linking to consumers. The EC Directive on online marketing specially includes a prerequisite to encourage the founding of such bodies. Simultaneously, numerous issues come up concerning to these organs' proficiency, enforcement strengths, placement and set medium. References Ashton, John K. Regulatory Perceptions of Marketing: Interpreting U.K. Competition Authority Investigations from 1950 to 2005 to (2008) Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 27(2) Baker Library, Current periodical publications, Issue. 1988, The Library. Bygrave Lee A & Dan Svantesson. Jurisdictional Issues and Consumer Protection in Cyberspace: The View from "Down Under" (24.05.2001) http://folk.uio.no/lee/oldpage/articles/CLE_paper.pdf Cartwright, Peter. Consumer protection and the criminal law: law, theory, and policy in the UK 2001, Cambridge University Press. Campbell Christian, Legal Aspects of Doing Business in Europe [2007] Lulu.com. Department of Trade and Industry, DTI. Guide to the Consumer Protection Act 1987. Corporate Affairs Directorate. EC Commission's, ECC. Action Plan on consumer access to justice and the settlement of consumer disputes in the internal market (COM (96) 13 final, 14.02.1996), 8-11. Espiner Tom EC wants software makers held liable for code (May 9, 2009) http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10237212-92.html Europa. Consumers: Safeguarding your rights (23/11/2009) http://europa.eu/pol/cons/index_en.htm Geraint G. Howells & Stephen Weatherill Consumer protection law Markets and the law 2005, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Kidd Paul T. E-business: key issues, applications and technologies. 2000 IOS Press. Knoblochov JUDr.Vra Developments in consumer protection in the EU 23.1.2006 http://www.mpo.cz/dokument13715.html Kutin, Breda Consumer protection in an enlarged Europe (September 1, 2005) Consumer Policy Review Kuanchin Chen, & Adam Fadlalla, Online Consumer Protection: Theories of Human Relativism, (2008) Idea Group Inc (IGI). LawInfo, Travel Insurance (10/2008) http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Articles/Consumer- Protection/Federal/travel-insurance.html London Economics, (November 2009) Study on Consumer Detriment in the area of Dynamic Packages. London Economics November 2009 Roger Ward, & Clarence Nelson Stone. Consumer protection: how it can be secured 2006 Harper, University of Michigan. Smith, Dennis & Sue Wright. Whose Europe: the turn towards democracy (1999)Wiley- Blackwell, Stuyck Jules. EC Competition Law After Modernisation: More than Ever in the Interest of Consumers (2005) Journal of Consumer Policy 28(6) Twigg-Flesner, Christian. Innovation and EU Consumer Law. (2005) Journal of Consumer Policy 28(4) Walker Peter M. Consumer law: Cavendish practice note. (2001). Routledge Cavendish. Read More