StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
In this paper, the author demonstrates why by law, the current government cannot indefinitely remain in power in the UK. And also, the author describes basic democratic principles and the drawbacks of the system of legislation…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System"

Teacher December 2007 Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System The electoral system used by the United Kingdom is one that has far-reaching influence; Commonwealth countries have adapted this basic system for their own electoral purposes and therefore have taken on the integral advantages and flaws inherent in the system. Like most democratic systems, the UK general electoral process was designed to benefit voters however there are several aspects of the system that are either a constant source of criticism or that might be seen as detrimental depending on your point of view. In particular, the controversial aspects of the UK general election system are the first-past-the-post voting process, the timing of general elections and the fact that a Prime Minister whose party has lost majority status might attempt to remain the national leader; the most positive aspects are the theoretical involvement of every citizen of voting age and the regularity in which elections must legally be held. The premise of the general electoral system is fully democratic and meant to benefit the voters over the ambitions of politicians. There are many legal checks put in place to ensure that the will of the voters is carried out; the problem is that interpretation of voter will is often ambiguous. Perhaps the most controversial aspect of the electoral system is known as first-past-the-post voting (or the plurality system); this is where the candidate or party with more votes than anyone else is given the leadership position (Judge 185). During a general election, Members of Parliament (MP) are elected from each established riding to occupy the House of Commons; the political party with the most MPs elected will take control of the federal government and be responsible for all federal legislation. What concerns many voters is that given the first-past-the-post method of voting, a very large percentage of voters can be misrepresented by the outcome of their local elections. If a high percentage of voters vote for the a losing party in their riding and this happens all over the country, the representation of political parties within the House of Commons can be very different than the actual percentage of votes that went to each party. Other countries, like France, have tried to deal with this issue by using a two-step plurality system that takes the two highest vote receivers from the preliminary round of voting and holds another round with only these two. In the UK, the concern that actual voting percentages are misrepresented in Parliament persists. Where the existing government is concerned, one of the primary negative aspects of electoral process includes the fact that the government is allowed to call an election at a time that best suits the party (Ware 300). Control of when the general election is held gives the current government the upper hand in terms of public opinion; politicians within the government can watch the trend of party popularity and be sure to schedule elections during a time when the government is viewed in its best light by the voting public, or when opposition parties are in disarray. Although the ability of the government to call its own election time was done on the premise that it would give them enough time to complete current projects and properly prepare for an election, the fact is that the privilege is used to the advantage of the current government so that it might keep its position. When the votes from a general election have been counted and the current Prime Minister discovers that his or her political party has not had the most MPs elected into Parliament, it is assumed that the Prime Minister in question will submit a resignation to the Monarch. If, however, he or she feels that the current government agenda might be supported by the newly elected MPs in Parliament, the option exists for the Prime Minister to deliver the Queen's Speech and ask for a vote of confidence from the House of Commons (Klug et al 77-79). The Queen's Speech is always delivered before the new term of Parliament begins, and it outlines the agenda for the federal government over the next five years. The Speech is then subject to a vote of confidence from the House of Commons, and if it is accepted the Prime Minister can receive permission to form the government despite the lack of votes from the public. The positive aspects of the UK general electoral system are those that are most rooted in the ideals of a truly democratic system: the involvement of every voting citizen in the electoral process, and the regularity in which general elections must be held. The most fundamental aspect of a democratic system, and therefore of the UK general electoral process, is the participation of the voting public in the overall outcome. This means that ideally every UK citizen of voting age should participate in the general election; this is not the case, however the ability of every citizen over the age of 18 to actually vote in the election is the major success for democracy. Another major positive factor in the UK electoral process is the fact that by law, the current government cannot indefinitely remain in power. Although the government does have control over when the general election will take place, it only has a five year span in which to complete its agenda and call people in to the polls. No matter what, the federal government cannot stay in power for more than five years without allowing the public to vote, which helps to ensure that Britons are being properly represented by their government (Weir and Beetham 490). The UK federal electoral process is based on basic democratic principles that include the right of the public to vote for its own government and regularly reconsider the progress of that government; the drawbacks of the system come from legislation that is more suited to the needs of the existing government itself as well as a flawed first-past-the-post voting system. Overall the British electoral system is dedicated to its fundamental democratic principles; in theory the will of the people is represented, however there are a few changes that could be made to ensure that this is really the case. Works Cited Judge, David. Representation: Theory and Practice in Britain. London: Routledge, 1999. Ware, Alan. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. Klug, Francesca, Weir, Stuart and Keir Starmer. The Three Pillars of Liberty: Political Rights and Freedoms in the United Kingdom. New York: Routledge, 1996. Weird, Stuart and David Beetham. Political Power and Democratic Control in Britain: The Democratic Audit of the United Kingdom. London: Routledge, 1999. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System Term Paper”, n.d.)
Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System Term Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1522002-government-and-politics-essay
(Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System Term Paper)
Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System Term Paper. https://studentshare.org/law/1522002-government-and-politics-essay.
“Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System Term Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1522002-government-and-politics-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Positives and Negatives of the UK Electoral System

Social De-alignment in UK

It has become popular through the recent years to view the voting patterns in the uk as less dependent on social attitudes and positions, rather than dependent on political factors.... The present work will be devoted to the discussion of the de-alignment and its social constituent as one of the major factors influencing the voters' behaviour....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Pressure Groups in the UK and US Politics

This essay "Pressure Groups in the uk and US Politics" discusses the main roles played by pressure groups in the uk and the US politics.... In the US pressure groups activity is presented wider and more active and they influence the political process more successful than in the uk.... So, pressure groups' features in Great Britain are determined by its political system.... pressure groups activity is that groups and parties in Great Britain cannot influence governmental policy so much as in the United States because of partial secretiveness of the British political system, and the range of pressure groups is not so widely presented as in the USA with their constitutional and more democratic traditions....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Economic Growth in the UK

Similarly, while neoliberal economic paradigm might have improved the Gross National Products (including that of the uk) of individual nations and improved the general standards of living, there are other aspects of human well-being that is not easily measured and fulfilled (Dixon, 1998, p.... The author of this essay comments on the economic growth in the uk.... It is stated in the present text that the promise of impressive economic growth has been a staple of electoral promises ever since the inception of parliamentary democracy in the uk....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Power and Social Movements: Change and Continuity

uk is a sovereign state in the northwest coast of Europe.... In every nation, there must exist a combination of members who belong to a large majority group as well as others who belong to a small minority ethnic group.... These groups coexist together, sharing the same resources and amenities....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Models That Account for the Way British Citizens Make Electoral Choices

This has been attributed to… y in being given space in a job alongside the availability of time for one to involve himself or herself in electoral process (Brynin, and Newton 2010, 23). Citizen engagement in political processes has become an issue of debate in Britain.... This is with regard to not only the citizens, but also political parties....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Decline in Levels of Membership of Political Parties in Western Democracies

Political parties are the core institutions in any given society, it is disappointing that membership in the parties, and activism is declining in the western advanced democracies over the years.... This is a threat to a weakened democracy when political parties are undermined… This piece of work explains the development and growth in the state regulation of parties over time that has reduced incentives for citizens to form active political rallies and parties. A closer and cordial relationship between the Individuals receive support from the state at the expense of accepting an increase in regulation, mostly with respect to the exercise of conducting elections (Albertazzi,D....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

In Today's Britain People Vote Less on Who They are than on What They Perceive

ackground history: a study of the British electoral system scenario would throw up certain very interesting pictures, profiling the significant transformations that have taken place during the last seven decades.... With increasingly complex behaviour of the voting patterns that were being observed in the contemporary general elections both in the uk and worldwide, psephologists came up new voting models that also quite often involved statistical calculations to explain voting behaviours and patterns, and in 1990 we find that W....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework

Elections and Politics

In such types of government, power is not in the hands of only one person or a particular leader who thinks of what can be beneficial to all Canadian Politics is being linked to what is being pertained to as a single-member plurality electoral system.... There are biases engaged in this type of electoral system.... Though the said electoral system has its share of strengths, yet there are also downsides towards it.... During past elections, it has been concluded by law scholars that in the single-member plurality electoral system, the occurrence or absence of discrimination cannot be guaranteed....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us