StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Legal Environment and Statutory Interpretation - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Legal Environment and Statutory Interpretation " discusses that abnormal behaviour of an animal such as biting of a dog while protecting its pups, is characteristic of its species in the circumstances, hence falls in section 2(2)b of the act…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Legal Environment and Statutory Interpretation
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Legal Environment and Statutory Interpretation"

Legal Environment What were the material facts of the case The plaintiff, Mr. Basil Cleese, was driving back to his home on the night of 28-29 July 1995. It was just after midnight, he was on the stretch between Torquay to Exeter, when his car met with an unexpected accident. A horse came running across the road and crashed on to Cleeves' car, causing him serious injuries. The defendants Andrew and Susan Findlay were identified as the care takers of the horse. The defendants bred the horse which caused accident and other two horses at about a mile distance from the place where the accident occurred. On the night of accident, all the three horses, broke away their surrounding fencing and fled away across the vegetation. One of these three horses reached to the place where accident took place. The exact reason for this sudden behavior of horses was not established but this kind of behavior is generally found when the animal is frightened due to some reasons. 2. What was (or were) the legal issue(s) in the case Mr. Cleese, the plaintiff, brought the case against Andrew and Susan Findlay, in the Exeter County Court, claiming that the accident occurred due to their negligence and under section 2 of the Civil Liability for Animals Act 1971; the defendants were totally liable for the accident. The judge, sitting in the Exeter County Court, rejected his both the claims. The Court of Appeal accepted the claim that though it was not defendant's fault, under section 2 of the Civil Liability for Animals Act 1971, they were liable for damage. Defendants, Andrew and Susan Findlay, then appealed against the judgment of the court of Appeal in House of Lords. The appeal of defendants highlighted the complexity and opacity of the Civil Liability for Animals Act 1971, which fixes the liability for damage caused by an animal. Section 2(2) of the act fixes the liability for damage caused when the animal's behaviour in the circumstances was in no way abnormal for an animal of the species in those circumstances. Section 2(2) of the act, deals with the animals that do not fall under the category of dangerous animals. It states that: "(2) Where damage is caused by an animal which does not belong to a dangerous species, a keeper of the animal is liable for the damage, except as otherwise provided by this Act, if- (a) the damage is of a kind which the animal, unless restrained, was likely to cause or which, if caused by the animal, was likely to be severe; and (b) the likelihood of the damage or of its being severe was due to characteristics of the animal which are not normally found in animals of the same species or are not normally so found except at particular times or in particular circumstances; and (c) those characteristics were known to that keeper ..." The non-clear tone of this section, especially subsection (b) has led to different interpretation at different courts of law. Subsection (a) and (c) are clearly understood but subsection (b) present two cases, first one is that the owner of animal is totally liable if "the likelihood of the damage or of its being severe was due to characteristics of the animal which are not normally found in animals of the same species" and the other one is the owner of animal is totally liable if "the likelihood of the damage or of its being severe was due to characteristics of the animal which are not normally so found except at particular times or in particular circumstances". The first case considers the animal where the species of the animal is, in general, docile but the particular animal that caused the damaged was abnormal and the second case considers the animals that are generally docile but the action that caused damage is outcome of their abnormal behaviour found at a particular time or in particular circumstances. 3. Which technique(s) of statutory interpretation do you consider that Lord Nicholls employed in the case Give reasons for your answer. LORD NICHOLLS based his interpretation of act on conventional interpretive techniques and used literal approach to the act. Second limb of subsection b of Section 2(2) states that "the likelihood of the damage or of its being severe was due to characteristics of the animal which are not normally found in animals of the same species or are not normally so found except at particular times or in particular circumstances" which can be literally interpreted as the behaviour of horse on the night of accident was not normally found in animals of the same species or are not normally so found except at particular times or in particular circumstances. And hence the case falls on the section (b). though the act was also interpreted in precedent cases in the other way around the most simplistic literal meaning of section 2(2) fixes the liability on the owner of animal if the animal's behaviour was not normal at the of accident and the owner is aware of such abnormal behaviour of animal at any particular time or circumstance. He also used "extending statutes" technique using Law Commission's report to clarify the doubt surrounding the interpretation of subsection (b). Law Commission's report has clarified on the issue of fixing the liability that the keeper of an animal is equally the creator of a special risk if he knowingly keeps an animal whose behaviour may be dangerous at any particular time or particular circumstances. 4. To what aids to statutory interpretation did Lord Nicholls refer to in his speech Your answer must indicate whether such aids are 'intrinsic' or 'extrinsic'. Statutory interpretation of the present case by Lord Nicholls is aided by the background summary of Law Commission report on which the Civil Liability for Animals Act 1971 is based upon. Law Commission's report clearly defines the rationale for strict liability under section 2. It states that "If there is to be strict liability for animals of dangerous species, then an animal not within this category should also give rise to strict liability if damage results from dangerous characteristics of the particular animal which are known to its keeper. The keeper of an animal is equally the creator of a special risk if he knowingly keeps a savage Alsatian as if he keeps a tiger". Lord Nicholls based his interpretation on intrinsic aids from the above extract of report which is also literally stated by the section (b) of the act. 5. Explain, in your own words, the ratio decidendi of Cleese v. Findlay and Another [2004]. Ratio decidendi of interpretation of act in precedent cases based on the same act is equally divided. Judicial opinion on the abnormal behaviour of docile animals was equally differential on the applicability of section 2(2) of the Civil Liability for Animals Act 1971. Some Judges made the conclusion that abnormal behaviour of an animal such as biting of a dog while protecting its pups, is characteristic of its species in the circumstances, hence falls in the section 2(2)b of the act. In some of precedent cases other judges has concluded that this type of abnormal behaviour of animal is outside the second class of cases identified in paragraph (b) of section 2(2). They argued that second limb of section 2(2)-(b) does not treat as abnormal behaviour which is characteristic of the species in the circumstances in which it occurred. Lord Nicholls referred to four of the precedents for the current case, Sybil v Granger, Trickett v Frank, Polly v Betts and Gloster v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police. Out of these four precedents, in two cases judges found that the requirements of section 2(2) were satisfied whereas in two cases it was opposite. In Sybil v Granger case the judge observed that injuries caused by an untrained Alsatian that was turned loose in a scrap-yard to deter intruders falls on section 2(2) and hence the defendant was liable for injuries on count of this claim. In present case Lord tilted towards Sybil interpretation of act with the aid of Law Commission's report. Lord Nicholls based the ratio decidendi of Cleese v. Findlay and Another case on the Sybil interpretation of Section 2(2) of the Civil Liability for Animals Act 1971. He concluded that the second limb of section 2(2) b holds true to the current case as characteristics of the horse was not normal at the time of accident as stipulated by act "characteristics of the animal which are not normally so found except at particular times or in particular circumstances". He laid back on the interpretation that characteristics of an animal behaving abnormally at a particular circumstances satisfies the second limb of subsection (b) of section 2(2). Lord Nicholls found that current case literally meet the criteria set by 2(2) as for the first subsection the damage was a kind which the horses, unless restrained, are likely to cause and it is known that due to their size the damage caused by horses was likely to be severe; and for the second subsection the damaged caused was due to characteristics of the horse that are normally not found in horses except at a particular time or in particular circumstances; and for the subsection (c) these abnormal characteristics of horses to run haywire when they are frightened is well known to the keeper. Lord Nicholls also referred back to the report of Law Commission which clearly states that "If there is to be strict liability for animals of dangerous species, then an animal not within this category should also give rise to strict liability if damage results from dangerous characteristics of the particular animal which are known to its keeper. The keeper of an animal is equally the creator of a special risk if he knowingly keeps a savage Alsatian as if he keeps a tiger". Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Legal Environment Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Legal Environment Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1509088-legal-environment-case-study
(Legal Environment Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Legal Environment Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1509088-legal-environment-case-study.
“Legal Environment Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1509088-legal-environment-case-study.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Legal Environment and Statutory Interpretation

Understanding Tort Law

To succeed in the prosecution the judges will apply statutory and law aids in the statutory interpretation to determine the verdict.... statutory interpretation is the process through which judges and magistrate interpret laws and statues in the law before applying them in decision-making.... In the interpretation process, UK courts apply some well-known conventions to avoid ambiguities.... The law defines litter as an item that defaces the environment such as bottles, papers, and other such things....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Rules, Rights and Justice: an Introduction to Law

Change in social environment that defines new codes of behaviour as well as developments in financial policies in jurisdictions changes content of law.... Any act contrary to the legal provisions is therefore unlawful.... Based on legal provisions and the relationship between law and environmental factors, dynamism establishes a number of reasons for unlawful behaviour as the dynamic nature of law itself also changes content of law and legal concepts....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Interpretation of Laws in the United Kingdom

According to the report interpretation of Laws in the United Kingdom the country's statutory laws comprise of the primary parliamentary Acts and secondary legislation.... It limits litigations, promotes clear drafting of legislations and enhances easier interpretation of laws by laymen provided they can understand the language used.... Nonetheless, the literal rule may lead to interpretation of legislations out of context and narrowing of the parameters of a law....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

UK Legal Methods and Legal Systems

legal analysis is a matter of interpreting data in terms of high level concepts.... Statements of the law, too are written in natural language ad legal arguments are often arguments about what the language means or ought to mean. ... Most legal system do not support well argued stories on both sides, the reason is, it is not the case the physical universe supports well argued stories on both sides of arbitrary proposition of physical chemistry, this not only happens in law, there is confident in its regularity that we put lawyers under a professional obligation of zealous representation without even asking whether the clients case has a leg for zeal to stand on ....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Statutory Instruments Analysis

This essay "statutory Instruments Analysis" sheds some light on the law as an important part of social structure and can be broadly defined as a set of rules enacted by the sovereign body to maintain law and order and to dispense justice.... The rules enacted through such delegation of powers to the local bodies are known as 'statutory Instruments'.... The statutory instruments can be challenged by the Parliament or even repealed if not found reasonable....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Interpretation of Acts of Parliament by Judges

The dilemma with statutory interpretation is that the court has to decide the meaning of a certain legislation passed by the parliament.... Seventy five of cases presented at the House of Lords in the United Kingdom are associated with interpretation of statutes.... interpretation of statutes involves applying and reading statutory laws,.... Some bills are rushed in parliament in time of emergency, hence the need for interpretation as a result of many errors that takes place during the act....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Statutory Interpretation as a Tool for the Formulation of the Courts Judgment

The author of this paper states that the examination and the analysis of the methods of statutory interpretation require a detailed presentation of their characteristics in order to define their value as well as their role to the 'construction' of the modern common law.... Under all circumstances, 'the statutes assume the existence of the Common Law and they would have no meaning except by reference to the Common Law' (Geldart, 1995, 2)A first step towards the complete presentation of the methods of statutory interpretation is the definition of 'interpretation' as it appears and operates in the legal area....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

The UK Legal Methods and Legal Systems

is it due to the flexibility of interpretation?... rg)statutory law is often considered the most important source of the British constitution.... This essay "The UK legal Methods and legal Systems" discusses approaches to law and legal reasoning, constitutional aspect of legal method, common law reasoning, environmental justice, comparative legal method and gives critique approach to law....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us