Free

CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
TORTS Cyber Torts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection Introduction The business world is governed largely by 2 types of law, contract law and tort law. Contract law pertains to the specific terms and conditions involved in the supply of a particular product or service…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection"

TORTS Cyber Torts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection Introduction The business world is governed largely by 2 types of law,contract law and tort law. Contract law pertains to the specific terms and conditions involved in the supply of a particular product or service. On the other hand, tort law governs all business practices (Cornell 2011) It is based on unwritten common law, although it can be reinforced by statutes passed by the legislature. Aside from these statutes, court decisions are based on precedent, that is, previous cases involving similar facts. Torts are wrongs committed against individuals and groups and can be intentional or unintentional. Intentional torts are wrongs done deliberately and therefore criminal and dealt with by criminal law and are uninsurable. On the other hand, unintentional torts are those committed inadvertently often due to negligence or carelessness and are therefore usually insurable. Examples of torts are cyber, strict liability, and product liability, for which consumer protection is required. Cyber Torts Cyber Torts are simply wrongs committed over the internet which cause some kind of harm to the internet user. (Talbot 2010) Examples include identity theft, illegal piracy of electronic property, arranging meetings for criminal transactions, false impersonation to obtain information and sending out vast amounts of e-mails containing harmful data or spam. As it is often difficult to determine who is responsible protective software is being developed. The most common cyber tort is identity theft followed by home shopping catalog sales. Other examples are trespass to chattels, conversion, cyber stalking/harassment and defamation. An example of the latter is a case where a female teenager befriended a male counterpart on My Space who made nasty comments about her resulting in her suicide. In defamation the negative comments must be false as truth is an absolute defense. They must involve the unprivileged publication of a statement to third parties (internet users) by at least the negligent acts of the publisher and cause perceivable damage to a perspective plaintiff. They are considered especially dangerous because of the global reach of the internet and the potential for source anonymity. Conversion is the unlawful application of the personal goods of another by the taker or a third party other than the owner and/or destroying or altering its’ nature. The required elements for a lawsuit are ownership or right of possession by the plaintiff, the defendants’ conversion by a wrongful act and causing harm to the plaintiff. Similarly, trespass to chattels requires meddling with a chattel in possession of another resulting in a) dispossession of the chattel, b) deprivation of the use of the chattel, c) impairment of the condition of the chattel and d) harm to the legal possessor of the chattel. Strict Liability Strict liability differs from ordinary liability in that a plaintiff does not have to prove the defendants’ negligence caused them harm, only that they sustained damage or injury resulting from an appropriate use of the defendants’ product or service.(Cornell 2011) For example, an employer may be held liable for the torts of an employee, unless the employer can demonstrate that the employee performed contrary to the employers’ instructions. In a products liability case where strict liability has been imposed by legislation because the product is inherently dangerous, purchasers of the product and injured others only have to prove the item was defective, that the defect caused the injury and the defect rendered the product inherently dangerous, even if the defendant exercised utmost care and was not negligent. The only defenses in such cases would be if the defendant could prove the plaintiff misused and/or tampered with the product causing it to become dangerous. In cases of harm caused by animals, strict liability is not usually imposed on owners unless by legislation or it can be shown the owner knew of the animals’ propensity to cause harm or it is considered a wild animal or did not take appropriate steps to restrain them. Another situation that could attract liability is the operation of an explosives factory in an urban area. Products Liability Products liability law is derived mainly from tort law although it can be codified by statute. (Cornell 2011)For example, regardless of any warranties supplied by the manufacturer products must be reasonably fit for the purpose intended and free from defects which could cause harm to the consumer and others. Assuming defects are caused by unintentional torts, they are generally insurable. Strict liability is usually applicable because it is often difficult for a consumer to determine whether the cause of the loss is a design, manufacturing or marketing defect, that is failure provide the consumer with accurate and complete instructions. Therefore all parties involved in the manufacture and sale of the product are jointly and severally responsible for damage and injury caused although insurance companies under a liability policy are required to pay only for resulting damage and injuries, not replacing the defective product itself. While strict liability may apply, there are defenses available. For example, if it can be shown that the consumer caused the damage themselves by dropping,, abusing or otherwise misusing the product, all defendants could escape liability, If a retailer can show that the product was received and sold in a sealed container they avoid liability. Generally, if any party can show that it would have been impossible for them to have contributed to the loss in any way, they can escape liability but the onus is on them to prove that. Consumer Protection The US Federal Trade Commission publishes various articles to educate the public on how to avoid scams or rip offs in different types of purchases and how to optimally exercise their rights.(Federal Trade Com.2009)Various jurisdictions have government consumer protection departments and organizations such as the Better Business Bureau and trade associations for the product involved can investigate on behalf of the consumer and assist in resolving legitimate complaints without litigation. Conclusion Aside from contractual obligations, tort law imposes requirements on the design, manufacturer and distributor of products. It is up to consumers to educate themselves on their rights if they feel they have been victims of tort infractions and to seek appropriate assistance when necessary. References 1) Talbot, Jonathon Tyler” Cyber Crimes” Penn State April 19, 2010 retrieved from https://webspaces.psu.edu (1ST432_SP10_TEAM4_CyberCrimesand Torts. 2) “Products Liability Law” Legal Information Institute Cornell University Law School Aug. 19. 2011 retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu. 3) “Strict Liability” Legal Information Institute Cornell University Law School Aug. 19. 2011 et al. 4) “Tort Law an Overview” Legal Information Institute Cornell University Law School Aug. 19, 2011 et al. 5) “Protecting America’s Consumers Federal Trade Commission Feb. 18, 2009” retrieved from www.ftc.gov/bcp/consumers.htm. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1450327-torts-cybertorts-strict-liability-products
(CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1450327-torts-cybertorts-strict-liability-products.
“CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1450327-torts-cybertorts-strict-liability-products.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection

Strict Liability

...; therefore, he must also bear its risks and costs. Strict liability would ensure fair results as the defendant would claim more benefits from an activity, all the more that he must also pay for the costs of such benefits. It is also appropriate to hold defendants strictly liable for their activities because some costs must be internalized (Oswald, 1993). This concept is based on the idea of economic efficacy and free economy. Some activities have natural risks or harm. Therefore, the injuries which arise from such activity must be also be borne by the person carrying out such activity. “Societal welfare is maximized when the price of a good accurately reflects both its true cost and the degree of...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Civil liability

...protected by immunity under section 6-5-338 of the Alabama Code 1975. The Code has categorically stated the duties of persons considered as State-age and has provided immunity to them from liability that may arise in line of the duties that is within their scope. The fact that Officer Williams and the dispatcher made communications as required by their functions as State- agents meant that the Code would protect them in an event that a liability arises. That notwithstanding, Swan, did not have to go through the humiliating situation. In order to avoid such situations from happening in the future, it is important that measures be taken especially in regard to training of...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Products Liability Research Paper

...?Introduction Product liability could be defined as a section of law that holds manufacturers, suppliers and retailers of products, liable for injuries caused by their products, upon consumers. This law specifically targets the products as explained in tangible personal products. Lawsuits in product liability fall under the category of tort laws and the litigation occurs for different reasons. Among the reasons include defects detected in the products that cause injuries, or other related damages to consumers (Friedman, 2004). These defects could occur...
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper

Products Liability Research Paper

...? Products Liability Research Paper PRODUCTS LIABILITY RESEARCH PAPER Introduction Product liability is one ofthe sections in the law whereby the manufacturers who make products to the public must be responsible for the injuries the products might cause to the customers. The claims which are commonly associated with product liability include the following; strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty and consumer protection. In the case of Ford motor company, the claim falls under the manufacturing...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Vicarious Liability

...? Vicarious Liability Briefly discuss the terms vicarious liability and corporate liability. Vicarious liabilityentails a tort where a third party is held liable due to the negligence of another person for whom they have a special relationship. For example, an employer may be held liable for a tort committed by his/her employee (Anselmi, 2012). On the contrary, corporate liability involves a legal responsibility of a company due to criminal acts executed by its employers. Corporate liability focuses to determine the extent in which a company may be held liable for the criminal acts committed by a natural person employed by that company (Bright, 2008). 2....
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Auditors' liability

...Liability Several points have been raised in the past to reduce or even protect auditors against liabilities. Some of the most practical and important points being deliberated all over the world are discussed below. Proportionate Liability The amount of information and involvement the auditors have in the say of the company's losses which audit failure has been judged to have played a part would be assessed and apportioned independently. The auditors would only be liable for the consequences of their own actions but not for the consequences of the actions of others. (Lambe, 2007) Contractual Limitation of Liability A point proposed by the UK...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Carrier Liability

...and chambers are well-suited for the storage of cargo, including their preservation and protection.4 These articles further emphasise that the carrier, including its personnel, are obligated to exercise all due caution to safely store and protect the goods.5 Furthermore, as stipulated in Article II, not only is the carrier responsible for the safe storage of the cargo but it is further liable for any damages which may befall the goods through loading and stowing.6 The above mentioned articles are immediately relevant to the question of the carrier's liability towards the damages which the rates may have wreaked upon the bagged rice. In brief, they establish liability...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Strict Liability

...to protect a particular individual on trial, but to maintain public confidence in the enduring integrity and security of the legal system. One of the safeguards inherent within criminal law is the presumption of mens rea that is the accused intended to break the law. However both at common law and through Statute there are crimes of strict liability and vicarious liability. Crimes of strict liability are those where intention (be it mens rea and/or negligence) need not be proved in respect of one or more of the elements of the actus reus of an offence. The prosecution only has to prove that the accused committed the actus reus. ...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Torts; CyberTorts; Strict Liability; Products Liability; Consumer Protection Law 3

...edition, Oxford, University Press Granmar C. (2010).Trade mark Paradoxes in European Brand Competition. Doctoral dissertation European University institute Cornish, L.(2010).Intellectual Property, Patents, Copyright, Trade marks and Allied Rights. 6th edition, London & Maxwell OECD,(2008).The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy, OECD, p. 87. OECD, (2008).The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy, OECD, p. 46 Boyd, C. (2005).Point of View: Alpha-Numeric Brand Names” Journal of Advertising Research, 25 (5), p.48, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament. (2008). The Council and the European Economic and Social Committee, COM, 465/3 p.7, ECT,(2009).Excluding domestic production and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Liability Issues - Limited Liability Company

...from the owner with 20,001 shares. The court held that once it was incorporated as a company, the liability was limited and the liability for issues and matters was only limited to the assets and shares owned by the business itself. Based on this, it is deduced that a business that has a limited liability is separate and different from its owners (James and Tilley, 2009). In doing this business, there are risks and there is a possibility that the computers of the firm could encounter some forms of risks. In that case, there is the need to protect the entity from having its liability spread from the organisation they will form to the owners of the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic CyberTorts, Strict Liability, Products Liability, Consumer Protection for FREE!

Contact Us