Nobody downloaded yet

Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Running Head: PRODUCT LIABILITY LAW SUITS Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim Insert Name Insert Grade Course Insert 10 June 2012 Introduction Product liability lawsuits make manufacturers of goods compensate consumers in case their goods and products become defective…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.1% of users find it useful
Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim"

Download file to see previous pages The product liability law was amended from its original form such that it shifted from caveat emptor to strict liability for manufacturing defects, which make a product unreasonably dangerous. However, critics of product liability law suits have said that it enriches plaintiff’s attorneys and that it has added costs of sold goods. Businesses in this regard have sought the help of state legislatures and Congress in the hope that they can reduce damage awards that sometimes costs them millions of dollars (The Free dictionary, 2012). Prada drug manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim, is facing a court case because it allegedly failed to warn consumers of side effects of drugs. This paper gives an analysis of product liability law suits in relation to this company. Theories of Liability Negligence In most scenarios, a plaintiff’s cause of action can be based on four unique theories; negligence, breach of warranty, strict tort liability and misrepresentation (Nolo, 2012). For the case of Prada drug manufacturer, negligence charges were that the plaintiff suffered serious injuries and death from unstoppable bleeding problems (Malik, 2012). Negligence in this regard can refer to the failure to exercise ordinary or proper care. It signifies that the person in possession of legal obligation, for this case, Boehringer Ingelheim omitted to do what was expected to have been done, or that he carried out an action that was not supposed to have been done. The manufacturer in this case was, therefore, held liable for negligence because he lacked reasonable care in the design and production of the goods that caused the harm. A clear example is that a company may be found to have been negligent if employees exposed a low level of work performance or if the management were responsible for the poor performance of work through implementing improper procedures that were responsible for unsafe products (Nolo, 2012). Breach of warranty This refers to the deliberate failure of the person selling a produce to discharge the terms of a covenant or representation made concerning the quality of the product. Boehringer Ingelheim failed to keep its covenant by producing a defective product; the reason it is facing law suits. Product liability laws normally assume that sellers should give specific warranties concerning the goods that they sell and they are, therefore, required to defend such promises. How far Boehringer Ingelheim will defend its product, will attract a lot of interest because deaths have already been confirmed. Misrepresentation This concerns the areas of promotion of sales through advertisements. This may involve the manufacturer or seller of products giving false security about the safety of a certain product. Such sellers can do this by moving attention away from the dangers of using the product. For the case of Boehringer Ingelheim, it only concentrated on treatment and refused to look at the side effects, signifying that it shifted attention from the dangers of using the drug. The plaintiff, in such an event, can prove that he relied on the misrepresentation that were made upon the product in buying it. Misrepresentation can, therefore, be urged using theories of strict tort liability and those of breach of express warranty. The former may include extending the responsibility of the seller or the manufacturer of the product to all persons who were affected by misrepresentation. In such a situation, all those who were near the damage that was caused by the poor ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim Research Paper”, n.d.)
Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim Research Paper. Retrieved from
(Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim Research Paper)
Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim Research Paper.
“Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim

Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers

...which are manufacturing cigarettes might be a greater move towards banning tobacco products. That can seriously turn the businesses down of the companies. Work Cited: Global Settlement of Tobacco Litigation: Hearing before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, First Session, July 29, 1997. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1999. Print. Vargo, John F., and J. D. Lee. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.: U.S. Supreme Court Opens the Door to Tobacco Lawsuits. New York NY [etc.: M. Bender, 1992. Print. Sylla, Richard Eugene., and Robert Eric. Wright. Limited Liability. London [u.a.: Pickering & Chatto, 2003. Print. Sherrow, Victoria,...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Ethics Questions: Torts and Product Liability transmitting their names and social security numbers. The transmission was claimed to lead to identity theft with regards to the tort. However, in the case of Buddha V. Lakeville Motor Express Inc., the court ruled that the distribution of the names and social security numbers did not constitute publication and therefore, no invasion of privacy of the employees. The tort of negligence is a result of one’s failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care or failure to act in a manner that constitutes ordinary care. Negligence is usually claimed in lawsuits that concern personal injury. Moreover, negligence, as a lawsuit concerning personal injury, arises from the aspect of individuals being negligent in...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Product Liability and Intentional Tort

...?Hypothetical Issues on Product Liability and Intentional Tort Hypothetic Product liability issues in the case Chase’s hypothetic case of injury by the paper shredding machine within the work place touches on whether Chase should be compensated for personal injuries caused by the machine. Product liability law is a division of tort law which seeks to a cause of action against the product’s manufacturer, seller or designer in situations where a person is injured by the product. Over the years, product liability law has shifted the liability arising from an...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Warranties and Product Liability

...Warranties Running Head: Warranties and Product Liability WARRANTIES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY Warranties 2 Concomitant to any contract of sale are the words "warranty" and "product liability". Hardly does any business sale transaction hold on to the caveat emptor or 'let the buyer beware' precept. Except for sale of used goods and auction sales, buyers, especially purchasers in good faith are now...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Product Safety and Product Liability

...Task Introduction The creation and development of a legal regulatory environment conducive to business and e-business is central to the improvement of trade among the E.U members. Currently, the Lisbon Agenda (2000) of “making the E.U the world’s most competitive and dynamic knowledge based economy by 2010” was already under threat because trade barriers to the development of general business and e-business had not been effectively removed.1 Because of this, many of the European Union’s businesses operate within an e-business environment that is full of legal uncertainties and legal impediments to the take up of e-business. Central to these legal uncertainties is the product liability directives...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Summary and implications

...of the FDA, Bristol-Myers and Pfizer might experience a decline in their sales projections which might also affect its stock prices which have gone up in the past few days at the New York Stock Exchange. The FDA justified their move by stating that the additional data submitted needs more time to review (Loftus , par 6). The original date for the decision should have been March 28 (Loftus , par 11). Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH and Johnson & Johnson, other manufacturers of new anticlotting drugs, may consider this a favorable development because it gives them time to establish their products in the market while the competition is not yet there. For the company - What does this mean...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Product Liability

...Product Liability The U.S Companies should be liable. The companies should have the responsibility of ensuring their products are safe. They must be held liable for placing products with defects knowing very well they will be used by individuals. This happens for the company fails to carry out the required inspections to ensure all products do not have defects. Anyone that allows the product to be available in the market without proper investigations on the products is held liable if they cause any injury or damage to consumers. The companies will be held liable since the release of the product to the market shows high levels of negligence and lack of consumer protection. Since the retailers utilize raw ingredients yet they know... that they...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

Product Liability Lawsuit against Toyota

...Product Liability Lawsuit against Toyota With the emergence of the concept of societal marketing, the deviation between quality and expectation has been narrowed down. The awareness extent among the customers or purchasers has created a real deal for manufacturers as well as for the law enforcement authorities. In the near past, history sighted a very strange phenomenon with a vehicle manufacturing company which is one of the top car manufacturers. It is the turn point towards Toyota incorporation (Rowe, 2011). They had to call the sold vehicles back due to foot break design fault. The issue was basically raised back in 2009 after a horrible accident in San Diego that killed a family of four members who were travelling in Lexus... . It...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Ford Pinto Product Liability Case

...costly to the firm. Indeed, the analysis revealed that the cost of the safer design was $137 million while the price of the injuries, deaths and car damages upon an accident was $49.5. The introduction of this defence evidence was based on a previously held BPL formula by Judge Learned Hand on product liability. The judge found that a company should take precaution if the precaution cost was less to harm-cost expected and discard the cost if it becomes a liability. Thus, Ford Motor Company claimed it was justified in failing to implement the safer design since it could pay off any possible lawsuits at a lower cost. However, in arriving at the punitive penalty against the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Product Liability Case

...Product Liability Case Product Liability Case Product liability cases have in recent years seen a significant increase, especiallyin terms of injuries filed in court by people who, despite undergoing minimally invasive surgery, develop serious cartilage damage. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently revived a case filed by Christina McClellan after suffering an injury caused by a shoulder pain pump, overturning a decision made by the district court. Christina McClellan underwent surgery on her troublesome shoulder twice in 2004, during which her attendants had administered pain killers using the “PainBuster” device...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim for FREE!

Contact Us