Nobody downloaded yet

Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This assignment overviews the concept of loitering in terms of criminal law and particularly in terms of the first amendment of the constitution that protects the due process clause, “freedom to loiter for innocent purposes” which intended that gangs were prevented from possessing dominion. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law"

Download file to see previous pages The assignment "Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law" talks about the first amendment of the constitution that refers to the loitering and protects the due process clause "freedom to loiter for innocent purposes".
In enactment of the ordinance proscribing loitering, it was intended that gangs were prevented from possessing dominion, over the public streets. Liability will only set in if an individual disobeys an order by a law enforcement officer, to disperse when asked to. As per the ordinance, the police have a duty of care to the residents, of maintaining peace and dispersing groups of individuals who inhibit it. Individuals must be protected from these gangs, as they induce fear to the extent that they are forced to remain indoors. In addition, they should be protected from threats, by these persons, which remain in one place without an apparent purpose, as they watch the residents’ movements and attack them at an opportune time.
The USA Patriot Act was established, to curb and punish acts of terrorism and enhance law enforcement. Initially, the act dealt with international terrorism acts. However, domestic terrorism was added to the definition of terrorism. As provided in section 802 of the act. Any act that endangered human life, was a form of domestic terrorism. Despite criticisms on the provisions of the act, it provided determent against terrorism at the best interest of the citizens, if the terrorists actions, were intended to guide government’s policy, by intimidation or coercion....
tained, so as to help in supporting, conducting or concealing an act of terrorism and more so, if the property is derived from, involved in, or used to commit an act of terrorism. An assertion of a probability, of believing that an individual or an entity has committed terrorism against the country, residents or their property; calls for action and as such, any provision permitting the government to curb and punish such acts is not unconstitutional. If a person negligently fails to perform his duty of care, he/ she will be liable for damages. However, the plaintiff ought to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that he suffered loss as a result of the defendant’s negligence. Secondly, he must prove that he was within the scope of that duty, and lastly, prove that there was breach of duty, and as such, fair and reasonable to impose liability. The state statute will be held void for vagueness if it fails to justify the three conditions (Scheb, 2011). Courts are justified by all means, to impose a requirement that prosecutors prove the defendant’s intent to escape. Escape is the voluntary departure from custody. It is justified as escape, if without permission, the defendant, voluntarily leaves custody with intent to avoid confinement. Prosecution must prove that the defendant had no intent to leave and not to return. As such, intent would be held as proof of the crime of escape. In addition, the prosecution can bring forth evidence of threats and violence, as the cause for the action taken, which the jury considers. In such cases, the conditions necessitating the defendant’s departure must be relatively mild and alternative remedies such as consulting the wardens, put into consideration. The general principle, “justification by choice of lesser evil” provides that the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law Assignment”, n.d.)
Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law Assignment. Retrieved from
(Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law Assignment)
Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law Assignment.
“Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law Assignment”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law

Criminal Law

.... The other related to the exclusion of women who killed abusive husbands in self – defence, self – preservation, or out of fear, where some time had elapsed, was patently discriminatory against such women. 28 The immediacy condition imposed by the trial judge in R v Duffy, proved to be dilemmatic. However, the rulings in subsequent cases came to terms with this inequitable decision, and from this, there emerged certain conditions for rendering a defendant eligible to adopt a defence of provocation. In R v Ahluwalia29 and R v Thornton,30 it had been contended that the immediacy requirement did not constitute a rule of law. It was also argued that this requirement had emerged from the decision in Duffy. 31...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Criminal law

...? Criminal law Actus Reus is the outward conduct element of the crime. The mental element necessary for a particular crime or the blameworthy state of mind that accompanies the act or conduct is called mens rea. These two ingredients form the basic element of the crime. Thus, mens rea by itself is not enough; the actus rea also has to be established. Causation is one of the actus reus crimes. This is where a conduct by one or by the defendant is the substantial cause of the consequence or the result. Parties to offences also crop up in this question. When there are different parties to a crime, principle offenders are deemed to have contributed to committing the offence. In this case Andrew decides to kill his wife Sue in order... was the...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Criminal justice/ criminal law

...and Tokyo Tribunal were both of ad hoc nature.2 It was during the Genocide Convention of the United Nations that the idea of a permanent international criminal tribunal took shape. Draft statutes were consequently prepared by the International Law Commission (ILC), but these efforts were hampered by the difficulty in coming to an accord on how to define aggression. In 1989, Trinidad and Tobago and several other Caribbean and Latin American states and NGOs petitioned for the continuation towards efforts to establish an international criminal tribunal to try drug trafficking cases. In the 1990s, events in Eastern Europe and Africa necessitated the establishment of ad hoc tribunals to try...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Criminal law

...any charges in relation to the library book as she did not complete the actus reus of the offence by taking the book from the property. Similarly with the rent money, she would only be charged with theft if she was unable to repay the amount spent when the rent was due to be paid18. Bibliography Cook, K, James, M, and Lee, R, Core Statutes on Criminal Law, 2006-2007, Law Matters Publishing Elliott, C & Quinn, F, (2000), Criminal Law, 3rd Ed, Pearson Education Glanville Williams, (1983), Textbook of Criminal Law, 2nd Ed, London: Stevens & Sons Glazebrook, P R, (2001), Statutes on Criminal...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Criminal Law takes the priority2. In several occasions, the people may undergo mental tension for long term affecting their regular mental state and in the events of unforeseen nature, they will be compelled to take some action immediately. In these cases, diminished responsibility may be applied while deciding the nature of the punishment3. Under this context, no doubt, Claire is involved in killing her husband, but her mental state which was disturbed due to the unacceptable behavior of her husband and the thinking of protecting the genuine interests of her daughter led to this incident. Hence, she should be protected under criminal law and she was forced to indulge in this act only due...
9 Pages(2250 words)Assignment

Criminal law

..., if the assailants are apprehended, they would also be charged with attempted murder. This owes to the fact that they were actually ready to commit this had the man refused to provide them with what they wanted. The difference between the two articles is that while there is use of force in in one, the other one has no such intensions to harm the individual. However, they are both similar in the sense that in both, theft is the main act. In matters of giving sentences though, the burglars using violence to obtain property may get up to life imprisonment depending on the laws of a particular country. This owes to the fact that such thefts committed more than one criminal act. They intended to murders,...
7 Pages(1750 words)Assignment

Criminal Law / Civil Law

...? Criminal Law: USA v. Dr. Robert W. Stokes Criminal Law: USA v. Dr. Robert W. Stokes The case against Dr. Robert stokes According to Cornell University Law School, “Criminal law involves prosecution by the government of a person for an act that has been classified as a crime” (Cornell University Law School, 2010, Para 1). In a criminal case, the government, through a prosecutor, files the case and if individuals subject to the criminal case are found guilty, they are liable for incarceration, fine payment, or both. However, in civil cases, guilty parties are liable to...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Criminal law criminal conduct. He said: "[W]hen intention or subjective recklessness is required as to an element of the crime, an honest mistake will suffice to negative mens rea. When the crime requires proof of negligence, a reasonable mistake will be required."23 The common law development of subjectivism in relation to the defence of mistaken belief as to the complainants age must be read together with the statutory provision for the defence. The general attitude suggests that the defendant’s negligence will be construed to defeat a claim of mistaken belief since implicit in the reguired ‘honest’ element is a requirement that the defendant be mindful and cognizant of factors attributable to the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law

...Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law: Burden of Proof Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law: Burden of Proof Many are the times when peoplehave watched movies and films which dwell on criminal investigations and legal drama. In these films, the different aspects that are required for the prosecution, arraignment in court as well as sentencing of a person are brought forth. But some of the terms that are used in these films are never paid attention to and many just follow the plot. Terms such as criminal evidence, burden of proof, and innocent until proven guilty and beyond any...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Criminal Law

...Criminal Law Criminal Law Capital punishment was meant for cases that involved the death of a victim. So, it is not appropriate for courts to issue the death penalty on other offenses other than murder. It is considered excessive and unconstitutional for an individual to receive the death sentence if the victim does not die, and this is under the Fourteenth and Eighth Amendment (Melusky & Pesto, 2011). In a case involving Patrick Kennedy of Louisiana, the accused was charged with molesting his step-daughter, and was given the death penalty. However, the Supreme Court overruled this decision by claiming that the decision was disproportionate with the crime committed. The...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Loitering in Terms of the Criminal Law for FREE!

Contact Us