Nobody downloaded yet

The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Person Should Not Be Criminally Liable - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Is insanity defense viable? Insanity defense can be dated back to the biblical times and can be attributed to have emerged from a myth that mentally ill individuals were not to be held responsible for act committed especially if the acts committed by a sane person would have been criminal. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94% of users find it useful
The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Person Should Not Be Criminally Liable
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Person Should Not Be Criminally Liable"

Download file to see previous pages The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Person Should Not Be Criminally Liable

The court found him insane whom in an assassination attempt to Robert Peel the British Prime Minister, mistakenly killed his secretary. This led to the formation of strictures whereby it was avowed that a defendant was required to have a mental condition or illness and even retardation that was required to be severe to an extent that the defendant had no insight as to the quality and nature of the act committed without the knowledge that the act was wrong. English law has reviewed the concept of insanity defense and is an area rich in evidence especially with reference to decided cases evaluating this defense. In this regard, this paper will critically analyze the insanity defense according to English law. Changes that have been made to the insanity defense will also be delineated and the paper will conclude with an assertion if insanity defense still exists.
To begin with, the English law stipulates that prior to passing judgment on an individual; the court has the responsibility of fulfilling two major components. Firstly, the court needs to prove actus reus which delineates that the defendant engaged in the conduct that was illegal as it was against the requirements of the law. Secondly, the court needs to prove mens rea illustrating the criminal intent in the act committed by the defendant. This is diversified in different courts as pertains to sanctions imposed. This shows that will is inculcated in criminal law illustrating responsibility of the defendant for his own behavior. However, the insanity doctrine precludes individuals from being responsible of their acts if they suffer from a mental illness that greatly hampers their ability to make concrete decisions (cognitive ability) or capacity to control behavior (volitional abilities) to an extent that their will becomes compromised.2 Insanity in English law is viewed from three main aspects. The first aspect entails insanity prior to the trial where despite the offender being in custody, he is insane. The English law requires that the Home Secretary detains the insane defendant immediately and receives a confirmation of insanity from two psychiatric doctors as pertains to the mental status of the defendant. The second clause of insanity is inculcated in unfitness of the defendant to plead following the defendant presenting with any of the six considerations stipulated under3. One consideration is the inability of the defendant too understand the charges, also inability to plead guilty or not and inability to challenge jurors. Consequently, inability to instruct counsel and instruct solicitors is also considered. Moreover, the inability of the defendant to follow proceedings and to give evidence in his defense is also reviewed.4 See R v Pritchard5and M (John)6. Following an assertion that the defendant is unable to plead, a second jury is usually set up determining if the defendant is guilty of actus reus. However, if the jury is convinced that the defendant is not liable for actus reus the defendant is acquitted. This cannot therefore lead to criminal conviction and hence the defense illuminating diminished responsibility is not viable as was the ruling in the case of Pierre Harrison ANTOINE v The United Kingdom7. The third aspect that inculcates insanity is insanity as the time of the offense. The major case that is used in this third aspect is the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Essay)
“The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Person Should Not Be Criminally Liable

The defence of self-defence’s doctrine of private defence. Ross should not be found guilty of the murder of Samantha and the defence of self-defence should have been put to the jury. Self-defence is a part of the doctrine of private defence in the English law according to which an individual may act in ways that are deemed illegal otherwise in an attempt to prevent the causation of injury to himself or others. Self-defence may also be done to prevent the crime since one assumes the very right of providing others with protection and safety as one does for oneself. Self-defence originates in the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay


...believe that insanity is a quality of those people who selfishly think of themselves only. Zaroff may also be insane because of his perceptions. When Zaroff said, “I have electricity. We try to be civilized here,” somehow he does not understand the concept of civilization, which is actually all about human interactions and not about electricity (8). Zaroff may therefore call himself civilized because he uses electricity but in fact, he murders people so he is actually very different from being a normal civilized human being. Such image may actually indicate an insanity buried so deep that it cannot anymore be consciously recognized by the self. Even with his dealings and...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Land Law: Property rules governing the Claims of Cohabitants

...Land Law: Property rules governing the Claims of Cohabitants of the Submitted to Word Count 2,506 (excluding bibliography, foot s and first page) 2,736 (excluding foot notes and first page but including bibliography) 1. Introduction Land law regarding property rules that govern the claims of the cohabitants are very complex. According to views of Law commission if government gives all the benefits of the cohabitants without having reasonable definition for it the very purpose of the marriage system will be damaged.1 So the law must be in a position to extend the benefits of the cohabitants under certain conditions. Those conditions...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Rules Governing Accounting of Non-current Tangible Assets Under IAS

...Rules Governing Accounting of Non-current Tangible Assets under IAS Introduction A critical review has been carried out in this write up about the matters prescribed under International Accounting Standards and directly affecting the accounting treatment of non- current Tangible assets. The main related standard is IAS 16 with other standards dealing with such issues in parts. 1(a). Accounting procedure under IAS 16 for non- current tangible assets In order to understand the accounting treatment of non- current tangible assets as addressed by IAS 16 the entire issue needs a detailed observatory discussion under following accounting issues: 1. Initial & Subsequent recognition of non-...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

When do the hague visby rules apply

...WHEN DO THE HAGUE – VISBY RULES APPLY? Introduction The Hague – Visby rule is a set of international rules that governs the carriage of goods by sea.These rules were initially drafted in the year 1924 in Brussels and were more popularly known as the “International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law Relating to Bills of Lading”. However, they were amended in the year 1968 by the Visby Amendments and hence it is now known as The Hague – Visby Rule. Obligation of the carrier to provide a seaworthy ship The obligation of the carrier to provide a seaworthy ship under the Hague and Visby Rules encompasses a wide range of clauses which includes, apart from several other aspects, the physical state of the vessel... , the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

When china rules the world

...When China Rules the World” By By: Martin Jacques Review: Books about China’s ascendancy to a chief world power are often prefaced but the Martin Jacques’ “When China Rules the World” carries an eye catching title. But it should not be a surprise. Anyone can see the outcomes of economic growth in China. China is growing at a tremendous rate. Jacques book is an examination of how and why that will happen and what it will mean. Martin Jacques has printed an excellent and well-liked book on China, which is exactly to the world’s need to understand and engage with the Chinese. Jacques himself does not speak Chinese but he is always ready to write something...
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review

When china rules the world

...When China Rules the World Order no.442339 May’10 When China Rules the World When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order by Martin Jacques is a convincing analysis of the decline of Western dominance and the rise of China as a new model of modernity. Jacques in this book writes about a nation that is on the threshold of becoming the world’s biggest market because of its stunning growth rate. He also writes about the decline of American hegemony and outlines the specific essentials that have made China a rising global power and how this may influence future...
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review

Liable or Not Liable

...Medsystems Suit Against EcoCarth Legally, EcoCath is absolutely not liable for any loss that was incurred by Medsystems. In law, the question of liability arises when intention, malice and capability is construed on the accused. There is no evidence that directly links EcoCath to that effect (Hazard & Linn, 2008). Medsystems has failed to establish substantial grounds to believe that any of their negotiations with EcoCath was based on concealed fact and therefore made uninformed choice in entering into a contract with EcoCarth. Prior to Medsystems getting into the contract with EcoCarth, EcoCath made according to me, a full disclosure of their business position with regard to products of interests,...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Governing carbon proving more important than the advantages. In a review, International Energy Agency concluded that the subsidies to renewable and low-carbon energy skills can result in the formation of enduring economic and environmental benefits. Hence, it is strongly argued that fuel companies should not be subsidized. This contention can be argued on the basis of facts. It is the duty of the Government to promote the growth of substitute fuels. Current technology has been broken enough that individual investors should be pacing in and funding these companies. It is also argued here that managing such a thing would be unfair to the private sector and taxpaying Americans. If a company desires to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The Rules Governing the Insanity Defence in Order to Determine When a Person Should Not Be Criminally Liable for FREE!

Contact Us