Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

The Supreme Court - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
POL 120 Spring 2012 Exam 2 Name Institution POL 120 Spring 2012 Exam 2 Question 1 Explain how the Supreme Court changed its view on de jure segregation and the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of “equal protection of the laws” from its ruling in Plessy v Ferguson to Brown v…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.6% of users find it useful
The Supreme Court Assignment
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Supreme Court"

Download file to see previous pages This is a clear indication that both have equal protection of the law regarding the rights that human beings should enjoy. This decision overrules the one offered by Plessy v Ferguson that allowed segregation in state- sponsored schools. The state should not provide separate educational facilities based on race since all people are equal, they should receive equal treatment. The court ruled de Jure segregation as a violation of Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution of the United States. This crucial factor paves way for the civil rights movements and integration (Losco and Baker, 2011, p. 15). Question 2 Why do liberals oppose health insurance to cover laws such as abortion restrictions while favoring laws that require contraception? Answer Liberals feel that abortion is a personal choice that people should not interfere with since it involves a woman’s body, her future, and personal health. Liberals feel that the life of children and parents is better when abortion is legal. This is because it prevents women from undertaking desperate measures to obtain illegal abortions. Provided abortion happens in a medically controlled environment with proper medical practitioners, then it should not be restricted. In areas where people have limited knowledge concerning contraceptives and sex education, abortion is necessary to control families in a state. Abortion is necessary in cases of rape, where the health of a woman is in risk, incest, congenital disorder, and financial constraints. Liberals require health insurance to cover the laws favoring contraception since they play a significant role in reduction of abortions (Losco and Baker, 2011, p. 19). An affirmative action is an action that favors those who tend to suffer from discrimination. Question 3 How can family, peers and school influence someone’s opinion on affirmative action? (6 points) Answer Families influence the affirmative action that one takes in a situation. The close bond and relationship that exists between family members’ influences a person’s decision. This bond forces people to weigh things differently and act accordingly to appease them. Peer pressure and school also influence a person’s affirmative action. In schools, teachers discourage discrimination as it leads to conflict among individuals. The law of a state also does not give room for discrimination making its practice a violation of law, which should face accusation (Losco and Baker, 2011, p. 27). Peer pressure is tremendously influential, as one tends to act the way peer friends act. Depending on the level of education of the peer group and their beliefs, the group interferes with the decision that one makes. The group might affect a person positively or negatively, and hence, every person has a responsibility to ensure that the effect is to their advantage. Question 4 Why did the Dred Scott decision make the Civil War more likely and lead to the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution? (7 points) Answer The Dred Scott decision is a ruling of the Supreme Court that the people of African descent could never become U. S. citizens. The court ruled the slaves as private property and, hence, led to Civil war. The slaves are people just like the citizens and oppose the way the citizens treat them as chattels. This gave them the motivation to oppose slavery since even in freed states; the free slaves enjoyed the rights of citizens. From the opposition experienced, the government found an amendment that is ...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Supreme Court Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
The Supreme Court Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from
(The Supreme Court Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
The Supreme Court Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words.
“The Supreme Court Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Supreme Court Assignment

Procedural Steps Involved in Bringing a Case to the Docket of the Supreme Court

..., who serves as a court clerk, there are also the law clerks of the justices. A law clerk assists the justice in making an opinion through research and the writing of recommendations. An example of a law clerk that is currently serving Supreme Court justice is David Morrell. He is a graduate of Yale and once worked as a clerk of Judge E. Jones of the 5th Circuit. The solicitor general represents that the interests of the federal government in the Supreme Court. 2. The Process through which a Bill Becomes a Law The Constitutional authority for law making is stated on the Article I, Section 1 of the US Constitution. This clearly states that it is the Congress of the United States that has the power to create laws. The Congress...
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

Supreme Court Case: Juvenile Justice

...Supreme Court Case Matters resulting from juvenile criminal behavior are rarely brought to the Supreme Court in the United States. However, at the start of the 1960s, the Supreme Court tried a number of juvenile cases that led to drastic changes in the procedures and character of justice system (Siegel and Senna, 2009). This essay looks into one of the most influential cases in the juvenile justice system, Kent v. United States. This case was a landmark in the justice in the justice system at large as the most powerful court in the country had consented to decide on a case that the appellant had claimed unfair treatment at the juvenile court. This case was involving a sixteen year old Morris Kent that was charged with robbery and rape...
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

The European Court of Justice

... of the people. This also led to interference of Parliaments of different member nations in interpretation of legal cases. Even in several occasions it was felt that the basic law of member nations of European Union is quite differently interpreted by the two legal authorities. This certainly makes the situation tough for the uniform legal interpretation. Hence there is strong necessity of one supreme authority at European Union level. This has been achieved by incorporating the principle of supremacy in the treaty of European Commission. If one analyzes the case of European arrest warrant, the Federal Constitutional Courts of European member nations would support the principle of the Basic law over that of European Union law. The similar...
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Appealing against the Refusal of the County Court

It is obvious from the stated facts that she was aware at all times during the time of the design, construction and the building process itself and the objections raised by her at the time of invoice are absolutely belated. At this juncture, her refusal to pay for the construction, therefore, seems to be a breach of contract.

However, the regulation covers an important aspect of human values since it is concerned with the safety of wild animals and the risks posed to it by the construction of a pool with unsafe parameters. If the sole criterion of this concern for wildlife safety is considered it becomes difficult to associate it with either the location of the pool within an urban or rural area and Samantha’s con...
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Modernization of European Court Competition Law

... a new enforcement system that introduced a legal exception system. It directly applies the provisions of Article 81(3). Therefore, any restrictive agreement would become valid and enforceable provided it fulfils the conditions of exception laid down by the Article 81(3) (Benini, 2003). Such restrictive agreement would be treated as valid from its inception. It can be enforced before national courts of the Member States. In other words, if a restrictive agreement fails to fulfil the exception conditions contained in the Article 81(3), it would be deemed to be null and void from its formation (Benini, 2003). As such, this new system established by the Regulation improves the effectiveness in implementing and enforcing the competition rules...
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

The American State Court System: History and Organization

...” seemed to be borne out as the Supreme Court struggled to establish the regulation of national power and policy (Newmyer, 1968, p. 18). Differing political philosophies, from Jeffersonian limitation to Federalist expansions, proved to be crucible in which a stronger Court was forged. The discussion of the Supreme Court, particularly during the first fifty years after 1789, is relevant to the state courts in two ways. First, the legitimate power of the state courts was perceived through the prism of the national structure, i.e., executive, legislative, and judicial branches, with the judiciary expected to not only apply the law to criminal and civil cases, but also to interpret the state constitution and, by extension, the Constitution...
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Supreme Court Ruling on 14 Penn Plaza V. Pyett

... raised the issue to the Second Circuit, which affirmed the decision of the District Court. The decision was thereafter appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Issue The issue to be decided is whether or not a provision in a collective bargaining agreement that requires union members to arbitrate ADEA claims is enforceable as a matter of federal law. A side-issue that was raised on appeal is whether or not a claim based on statute could be decided in an arbitration proceeding, instead of in a court of law. The Decision of the Court The Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the Second Circuit and the District Court, and ruled in favor of the petitioner-employers, that a CBA agreement provision may be enforced requiring...
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

The International Criminal Court and the Legal Principles Developed by the Ad Hoc Tribunal

...The International Criminal Court and the Legal Principles Developed by the Ad Hoc Tribunal’s for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Introduction The UN Security Council set up the ad hoc International War Crimes Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and Rwanda (ICTR) with the intention of individualizing guilt. The idea was to hold both leaders and individual offenders responsible for crimes against humanity as opposed to entire communities. The UN Security Council had hoped that by taking this approach to culpability, the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda would find peace.1 Ultimately the ICTY and the ICTR were formed to prosecute humanitarian atrocities that occurred during times of conflict. The establishment of the International...
20 Pages (5000 words) Assignment

Marketing: Supreme Multivitamins

...Supreme Multivitamins Define what is meant by the term ‘segmentation’? A quick scan of available academic literature shows that there is general agreement on the meaning of the term market segmentation. Most academics and practitioners take the term to represent “the process of division of a collectivity into homogeneous groups according to one or more criteria” (Claudiu, Ionel & Tudor, 2008, p. 790). It has also been defined as the “process of subdividing a market into distinct subsets of customers that behave in the same way or have similar needs” (Bennett, 1995, p. 165). The purpose in segmenting the market is to more effectively concentrate efforts in one or several well-defined target segments, each of which may be addressed...
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Analysis of Court Observation

.... The first case in the Supreme Court was a class action suit with the plaintiff suing the defendants for 5 million US Dollars due to an injury sustained. This was a jury trial case with twelve jurors. Last week I attended the San Jose Supreme Court for the hearing of a civil case presided by the honorable judge Derek Woodhouse. The plaintiff was a young lady a one Ms. Clare Robinson and the defendant was Dardi Limousines a San Jose Limousine rentals service firm. Ms. Clare was represented by a very young attorney Ms. Torres Ross and attorney for the defendant was Mr. Parkinson a reputable attorney from a very famous law firm here in San Jose. The case was before a 12...
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic The Supreme Court Assignment for FREE!

Contact Us