Nobody downloaded yet

Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Why trial by jury should be retained
i. introduction
ii. Facts and statistics on juries
iii. Objectives of the review
iv. How juries operate
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.9% of users find it useful
Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained"

Download file to see previous pages It is though this confidence that citizens appreciate the independence and the important role played by the judicial system. Trial through a jury has been a long tradition in the justice system that it is considered as unique approach in the justice system in that it requires the use of ordinary citizens without prior legal training to hear evidence in a court of law, make sense of the conflicting facts and the application of legal rules to reach a final verdict about which all or the majority of jurors can agree. Thousands of cases are heard and determined by juries annually and prediction regarding the potential verdicts has a large influence on the decisions required to settle civil lawsuits and in offering and accepting plea bargains in most criminal cases. Jury trials have therefore an important role to play in the law. It is through these juries that psychologists can better perceive how individuals perceive, interpret and remember evidence and the various ways in which the juror members can establish consensus with one another. Largely, the use of these juries in trials is mainly observed as giving the public the power and entrusting them to govern themselves in that the members are just ordinary public with no prior training in law. Most western countries through this have undertaken to use juries in both criminal and civil cases. Does it mean that judges are not entrusted to pass out credible verdicts? Not really. Jurors are just intended to ensure that the trial has the view and acceptance of the ordinary man. ii. Facts and statistics on juries In 2005, about 16,397 tort cases were disposed by jury or bench with the jury hearing 90% of these cases. 80% of all jury trails globally takes place in the US 70% of Japanese citizens reluctant to serve in the jury In 2009, there were six verdicts over $1,000,000 in the US in medical malpractices with largest being at $23.6 million settled after trail (Day, 2010). iii. Objectives of the review This review has several objectives which are; Evaluating the importance of a jury Understanding how a jury operates Recommending the retention of juries in corridors of justice. iv. How jurors operate. Jurors in most cases do a good job in weighing the evidence provided and applying the law in passing out the verdict of an accused (Greene & Bornstein, 2000). Usually, where jurors are considered to have erred, there is evidence that the errors reflect well documented and universal psychological principles that may include heuristic reasoning and attribution errors (Greene & Bornstein, 2011). This may aid in watering down the numerous criticism along with extensive media coverage that portray sensitive cases that have been used to portray the jury as being incompetent and resulting to wrong judgments especially in criminal cases. These errors occurring within the acceptable and recognized psychological principles explain the overall usefulness of these juries in civil and criminal cases and further explain that there is an importance of retaining them in the corridors of justice. The lack of fairness in the court system may be attributed to: System not offering required protection to citizens form harm by bringing offenders to the required justice Proceedings in the court system being lengthy Outcome of sentences portraying a disconnection between the crime committed and the senesce handed to offenders (Falconer, 2006) Juries in most cases ensure that judges entrust fairness and preserve the issue of subjective decision making in convicting persons in a court of law (Lea, 2006). The role of jury is to weigh the evidence this is presented in court, apply the law as directed by the trial judge regarding the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from
(Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words.
“Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained

The Trial of John Peter Zenger and Jury Nullification

...from Britain to America. However, upon his arrival, Cosby demanded that Van Dam turn over half of the salary he had received as Acting Governor. When the latter declined, Cosby sued Van Dam in a court which he created solely for that purpose. (The Trial) To ensure a favorable decision, Cosby bypassed the jury from his case and instead appointed the Supreme Court of New York to hear and decide the collection suit at first instance. Van Dam challenged the legality and constitutionality of this act but he lost on a vote of two to one. Two Supreme Court justices voted in favor of the constitutionality of Cosby’s act while the lone dissenter was Justice Lewis Morris. Later, Cosby demanded Morris to explain...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Thw Right To Elect Trial By Jury in Hong King

... to its colonies during the colonial era (Vidmar, 2000, pp. 1-2). Indeed not only did the British colonies retain the jury systems after obtaining independence from the British colonies, but a number of other jurisdictions in Europe and elsewhere adopted some form of jury trial (Vidmar, 2000). Hong Kong retained the right of jury trial in its Basic Law (Hong Kong Basic Law, 1997, Article 86). However, a recent decision by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal and the Final Court of Appeal in Chiang Lily v Secretary for Justice (2009 and 2010 respectively) confirm that the right to a jury trial in Hong Kong is not an absolute right. This paper analyzes the decision of Chiang Lily, specifically the determination that a right to jury trial... , thus...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Should trial by jury be retained present the arguements for and against retaining the jury system in criminal court cases. Ref

...?Should Trial By Jury Be Retained? Introduction Trial by jury has long been regarded as the bastion, supporting the criminal justice system. The argument about retaining trial by jury is complex. While advocates of trial by jury uphold it as a constituent element of the fabric of justice, challengers to it hold it as an antiquated and old form of establishing guilt. Trial by jury has for ages been extolled as a bastion in the criminal system of justice. This is meant to instil ethical authenticity required from the law....
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Trial by jury has no place in modern Britain

...practice was held; the right to a jury trial was often denied to the offender, a fact that has led to the deterioration of the relationship between Britain and USA in 1770s (Litan 1993). During that period severe conflicts were developed between Americans and British regarding the right of the former to ask for a jury trial ‘both in civil and in criminal cases’ (Litan 1993, p.35). 4. Why trial by jury has no place in modern Britain In order to identify the potential value of jury in modern Britain it would be necessary to refer to the current problems of jury trials in...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Society and its Attraction to Jury Trial

...?Society appears to have an attraction to jury trial which is emotional or sentimental rather than logical Introduction It was always an accepted fact that the much-idolised British institution of jury trial (‘12 good men and true’) was at the core of UK legal system, and thus was held in great presage right from the time of its initiation.1 Always commended as a strong sign of democracy within the realms of UK criminal laws, it symbolised the very essence of public assurance, essential for defining the ethical permissibility of the existent criminal system and continuing with support not only from the political and legal system, but also from the general civic populace....
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Is Trial by Jury an Efficient and Just System also an efficient and just system because juries do not have the same concerns over public image and power that are on the conscience of a judge. A judge may be elected or appointed to his or her position based on prior records and decisions, and how well they keep their courtroom determines whether or not they will keep their job (Bogira, 2005). For example, in Chicago, a printout known as “disposition totals” is dispersed through the criminal courts every week, and these totals factor into whether or not a judge will be retained from year to year (Bogira, 2005). This system functions mainly on the theory that keeping cases moving, whether through a quick bench trial or a plea...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...? Jury trial analysis Introduction A jury trial seems to be an absolutely easy process consisting only of five simple steps: selection of a jury, thetrial, judge’s charge to the jury, jury deliberation and verdict. However, it is also important to critically consider the assessment of the constitutional trial rights that are enacted during a jury trial, as well as to examine and discuss the selection of a fair and unbiased jury. These are some of the most important critical points that need to be considered in a jury...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...? Jury Introduction The configuration of jurors in the American judicial system, with the inclusion of racial minorities, alongside other majority races, has attracted considerable attention among intellectuals. Correspondingly, arguments have been drawn both in favor and against the statement that the jury should be constructed with the members, excluding the jurors belonging to the race of the convict or the defendant. Where on one hand, this might protect the interests of the people in terms of unbiased judgment; on the contrary, it may also hinder racial diversity in the judicial system of the nation and hence, be termed as a practice of racial discrimination. Therefore, whether...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Petit (Trial) Jury

...up with a verdict, it is referred to as a hung jury (Tomlins, 2008). Expanded Definition for Lay Person A petit jury is made up of six to twelve jurors. Its role in a civil case is to listen to all the evidence, which are presented in a trial and then decide whether the defendant injured the plaintiff or if they did not fulfill a duty that is legally their responsibility. The jury also determines the penalty or compensation which the defendant should honor if found guilty. If the case is a criminal one, they must decide on whether the defendant was, in fact, complicit in the crime he or she was accused of committing. In these cases, the judge usually...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework

The Place of a Jury Trial in Modern

...with or without a jury. A jurytrial therefore has no place in modern day Britain because it is very expensive (Cooper, 2012). The second reason whytrial by jury is being faced out from the justice system is the fact that it is a lengthy process and is extremely time consuming. This is because the jury has to deliberate upon the evidence that has been presented to them and give results of their fact finding. More to this, the presentation of evidence to the jury and the directions given to the jury ...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained for FREE!

Contact Us