Nobody downloaded yet

Explain and Contrast Three Major Interpretations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Running Head: THE THREE INTERPRETATIONS OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT The Three Interpretations of the Fourth Amendment By Introduction The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Two important clauses can be noted from the aforementioned provision: the reasonableness clause, and; the warrants clause…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.9% of users find it useful
Explain and Contrast Three Major Interpretations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Explain and Contrast Three Major Interpretations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court"

Download file to see previous pages The Warrant Approach Before the 1960s, the courts approached the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment by closely linking the two clauses on reasonableness and warrant. The first is deemed a mere introduction to the second clause, which implies that so long as warrants are employed in conducting the search and seizure, then the principle of the Fourth Amendment is met because the warrant is the embodiment of the reasonableness clause. On the other hand, any search and seizure conducted without the use of a warrant is ipso facto unreasonable and defies the reasonableness clause of said Amendment (Harr & Hess, 2007, pp. 178-179). This approach is underpinned by the idea that unless within established exceptions, warrantless searches or seizures in which there have been no prior approval by the court are unreasonable because they are conducted outside the realm of the judicial process (cited in the dissent of Stewart in US v Edwards 415 US 800 (1974). The conventional Warrant Approach is evident in the cases of Coolidge v New Hampshire 403 US 443-454, US v. Chadwick 433 U.S. 1 (1977), Payton v New York 445 US 573 (1980), Go-Bart Importing Co v US 282 U.S. 344, the dissent in US v Edwards 415 U.S. 800 (1974) and Camara v. Municipal Court 387 US 523 (1967). In Coolidge, the US Supreme Court reversed and remanded the conviction of the defendant on the ground that the evidence supporting it was inadmissible for violation of the Fourth Amendment. The search warrant for the search of the defendant’s car was invalid because it was issued by the Attorney General who was the chief prosecutor of the case and was therefore not a “neutral and detached magistrate.” Because there was, in effect, an absence of warrant, the search was deemed done outside the judicial process and was per se unreasonable. In Chadwick, the Court ruled that opening a footlocker inside the trunk of a car without a warrant contravened the Fourth Amendment because of the heightened privacy expectation attached to it. In Payton, a New York law allows the police to enter a felony suspect’s home and arrest him without a warrant. The Court ruled that this law violated the Fourth Amendment because it allowed a search without prior authority granted by a neutral magistrate. In Go-Bart Importing, the Court reversed again a judgment of conviction on the ground that the search of a desk and a safe and the seizure of evidence therefrom on the basis of a search warrant issued by the US Commissioner were invalid under the Fourth Amendment. Finally in Camara, the Court ruled that searches conducted by government health and safety inspectors are subject to warrant under the Fourth Amendment because they intrude upon the privacy of persons protected by it and unless the owner consents to the search, the same is deemed unreasonable. The Reasonableness Approach In the 1960s, the US Supreme Court broadened its interpretation of the Fourt ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Explain and Contrast Three Major Interpretations of the Fourth Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Explain and Contrast Three Major Interpretations of the Fourth Essay)
“Explain and Contrast Three Major Interpretations of the Fourth Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Explain and Contrast Three Major Interpretations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court

Fourth Amendment the police” (Levy 1995, p.164) In the case of Wolf v. Colorado, the Supreme Court recognized that “fourth amendment rights are basic to a free society and are therefore, implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” (Article 1, § 7 of the Tennessee Constitution) It is thus evident that the fourth amendment is also enforceable against the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment that also secures the rights of an individual to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The are various interpretations of the clauses contained in the fourth...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

The First Amendment and the Supreme Court

...if what is being expressed is considered a travesty by the majority. This is why the very liberal ACLU would defend such a reactionary group as the National Socialist Party-they were really defending everyone's civil liberties. Peaceful assembly is a fundamental right in the United States, and to deny it for one group sets up a dangerous precedent for everyone. Conclusion As the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is over 200 years old, it requires interpretation in order to stay on top of the changing social, political and technological changes that have taken place since our nation's founding. The Supreme Court, the highest court...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

United States Supreme Court and the Constitution the Dred Scott case, and Chief Justice Taney wrote the majority opinion, which has in some quarters been labeled as the most bone headed decision in the annals of jurisprudence. Taney's majority opinion said, "Scott was not a citizen and thus had no right to sue in federal court". On this premise, Taney made three points: (1) He observed that Africans - slave or free were not included in the category of 6 "citizen" as the word was used in the U. S....
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...The Apocalypse of Adolescence By Yuliya Having read through the article en d "The Apocalypse of Adolescence", several conclusions came to mind. First, juveniles should almost never be given the death penalty, as this provides virtually zero learning in relation to moral guidance and the receipt of understanding as to what is right versus what is wrong. The death penalty takes their young lives and forever changes them, without the opportunity to be rehabilitated by competent sociological or psychological professionals. However, when the case is similar to the one in the article, the juvenile death penalty may be imposed, especially when the children show no regret for their actions. The problem, however, appears to lie in whether...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

The supreme court does not have the power to execute its decisions and interpretations. how then, does the supreme court obtain compliance with its interpretations of the constitution

...with certain powers to influence Supreme Court. Section II of Article 3 subjects Supreme Court to exceptions and regulations made by Congress e.g. it can increase the number of Judges in Supreme Court and then the president can appoint new judges to form a favorable majority. Similarly, Congress can bring amendments in congress to reverse the opinion of Supreme Court. (Pollock V. Farmers’ Loan And Trust Co., 1895) Apart from judicial review, a couple of other factors also help in ensuring that writ of the highest court is followed. These factors...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Fourth amendment

...the colonial America that involved the issuance of searches without a cause or a warrant of arrest. The Amendment is meant to safeguard the people of America from privacy violations in the form of seizures and searches of their cars, homes and other properties. The Amendment also covers issues concerning the unlawful arrest of people. The Fourth Amendment The amendment is concerned about privacy; privacy is what the society is willing to embrace as reasonable as it is by the court’s interpretation. Determination of what is reasonable is dependent on the balance between the individual’s rights and the public interest left...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

U. S. Constitution

...US Constitution s right in American political system refers to the political rights reserved for the governments. Even though America asa whole has a federal government, each state in America has separate state governments. US constitution provides some specific rights to the state governments in law making even though all the state governments are operating under the federal government. The rights of the state government are protected by the tenth amendments (Part of bill of rights) in US constitution. According to The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; “The powers not delegated to the United States by the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Political philosophy and the constitution/supreme court

... Political Philosophy and the Constitution/ Supreme Court Part According to Hamilton, the court is an that can only exercise judgment, which has neither purse nor sword. He continues to argue that the power of the court must wholly depend on the assistance of the executive in exercising its judgments. During the Lochner era, politicians and the court were guided by public opinion. The experience of this era showed how judicial review and judicial independence were based on public opinion. The Liberty clause created a problem to Hamilton’s vision because the public had liberty to give their opinions to courts during judgments. Hamilton did not agree to that since he firmly stood on the opinion that the will of the court may... in favor of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Supreme Court was executed as a way to prevent these American-Japanese from committing espionage during the war time. Korematsu who is the plaintiff saw the execution of the order as being unconstitutional and being in violation of the Fifth Amendment. He therefore refused to move and was arrested and convicted. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court which ruled strongly in favor of the presidential executive order insisting that the rights of the plaintiff were minimal and hence of no significant compared to the Americans in general (Alonso 52). Issue to be resolved The issue that was being resolved by the Supreme Court was on whether to affirm or duly...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

... DD Month YYYY ESSAY POLITICAL SCIENCE Introduction The American government is divided into various armswhich perform different functions. The arms include the judiciary, legislature and the executive. Every branch of the government has distinctive functions which they perform independent of the other branches. To achieve this each has their specific roles which they perform as led by their leaders. All branches are guided by the American constitution which details out the rule and regulations governing the Americans. This paper explores the functions of the supreme court, its roles as well as Federalism and its effects to America (R. Dye, Zeigler and Schubert). SUPREME COURT The supreme court carries out various functions... which...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Explain and Contrast Three Major Interpretations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court for FREE!

Contact Us