Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The cases of Coleman v. Brown (1990) and Plata v. Brown (2001) involved serious violations of the constitution in the prison systems of California, which had persisted for years, but remained uncorrected (Anonymous 7)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.5% of users find it useful
Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)"

Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United s (SCOTUS), in the cases of Coleman v. Brown (1990) and Plata v. Brown (2001) on the people of the State of California The cases of Coleman v. Brown (1990) and Plata v. Brown (2001) involved serious violations of the constitution in the prison systems of California, which had persisted for years, but remained uncorrected (Anonymous 7). California was then directed to remedy the unusual and cruel punishments clause by a court order from a court of three-judge district. The first class action involved prisoners who had serious mental disorder (Coleman v. Brown), while the second class action involved prisoners who had serious medical conditions (Plata v. Brown). Release of Prisoners after many years of failed justice in large numbers, if the state did not get another way of complying with the order, is without doubt a matter of grave concern to the Californian people. The state argued that such violations could be reduced by new constructions and transferring prisoners out of the state, hiring more medical personnel and increased efforts by Coleman Special Master and Plata Receiver. The fast impact of the decision on Californian people is bankrupting the Californian state, (Anonymous 1053). This is because; remedial efforts of meeting medical requirements, food and shelter for prisoners who were highly populated could financially strain Californian sate, rendering it bankrupt. Building of new facilities and hiring of new staff. This is because plans of funding such plans had not yet been secured and while funding of other plans had been delayed. In reference to the fiscal crisis in California, the court declined any remedy which required any additional spending that was significant to the state (anonymous 151a). On the other hand, Appellants 34 observes that release of seriously mentally ill prisoners is dangerous to the people of Californian state because of the rates of their recidivism. However, the government did not find any impact of public security as a result of releasing such people (Barbara 21). If I were a judge in this court, I would have joined the minority. This is because; I believe that public safety should be prioritized irrespective of any situation. To ease congestion in Californian prisons, the federal government has the responsibility and capability of ensuring that all prisoners are able to access all basic human necessities. Therefore, the inhuman conditions in Californian prisons are result of government negligence. The federal government should therefore add more facilities and medical doctors plus ensuring that every prisoner can access food and shelter. The government should also take the responsibility of ensuring that the public is taught on the importance of maintaining law and order, thus reducing the number of criminals who are held in prisons. The department of justice and federal Bureau of investigation (268) confirms that public education on law and order could reduce rates of crime by 57.8%. Before allowing the federal district decree to release 46,000 prisoners (Barbara 12), says that the court should bend to the law by ensuring that such a decision does not result into any outrageous consequences. However, today, the court disregards the stringent provisions of the statute together with the traditional constitutional limitations according to a federal judge power. According to Alito, the constitution does not allow federal judges to run the state panel system. Though the federal courts are responsible in ensuring that constitutional standards are met in prisons, undesirable conditions in prisons that do not cause constitutional violations are far beyond the reach of federal courts. Work Cited Anonymous. Supreme Court of the United States. California; California press, 2010. Retrieved on 15th June, 2011 from Barbara, Leonard. U.S Supreme Court Upholds to Reduce Californian Prison Population. Court House News Service. May 23, 2011. Retrieved on 15th June 2011 from Dept. of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Reporting Statistics. Retrieved on 15th June, 2011 from Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Impact of the Recent Decision by the Supreme Court of the United Essay)
“Impact of the Recent Decision by the Supreme Court of the United Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)

U.S. Supreme Court decision

...credits are private funds ? not government funds (Liptak, 2011). ACSTO, like many other programs in the U.S., gives state residents the ability to receive a tax credit for contributions to private organizations that provide private schools with scholarships. This ruling has wide-ranging effects across the governmental, political, and structural spheres of America. The ACSTO decision will greatly impact the way state governmental entities deal with programs similar to ACSTO across the country. Now that such programs will be recognized as legitimate, due to U.S. Supreme Court precedent, state institutions will no longer be...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

United States Court System

... call for a routine assessment of sentences of life imprisonment or capital punishment by the court of last resort. Nearly all decisions supported by the appellate court; but if an appellate court thinks that a petition is legally sound, it can annul and withhold the case. Defendants that are dissatisfied with a verdict by an appellate court may try a petition to the Supreme Court; nevertheless, this petition should be derived from a suspected violation of the rights of the defendants protected by the U.S. Constitution or the federal law (Walston-Dunham, 2008, 39). Due to increasing number of cases in the 1980s, several ingenious strategies were created to lessen the caseloads of state courts in an effort to enhance the efficiency... and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

United States Supreme Court

...The United s' Supreme Court acts as a check for the legislative and executive branches of government as acts as the country's highest platform for not only judicial but also political resolution. Thus, it is natural that an appointment to become a Supreme Court justice is of public interest, if not concern. The interest in the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court by President Barrack Obama garnered more than its share of scrutiny. However, there are some opinion that the hesitation stems from Sotomayor's gender and race being a Latina. The attention was not just due to her skills and experience to take up...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

United States Supreme Court and the Constitution

..., "for many Americans the court is the echo of the constitution when it agrees with them and the voice of subjective prejudice when it does not"(McCloskey 16). McCloskeys' thesis is that the decisions of the United StatesSupreme Court lean congruently with popular American opinion. Some historians have put forth the administrative argument that Chief Justice John Marshall was the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, albeit belies the historical facts. (John Jay from New York was appointed by George Washingron as the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

United States Supreme Court

...($39,000) is less than the debt’s amount. The question presented is whether a debtor can “strip down” the lien of the creditor on the real property pledged as collateral for the debt to the value of the collateral; more specifically, the United States Supreme Court was asked to determine the applicability of section 506(d) to this particular set of circumstances. For the reasons discussed below, the Court held that section 506(d) did not allow the debtor to “strip down” the lien. As an initial matter, the Court admits that section 506(d) is ambiguous, that both parties have made valid points, but that sound policy and harmonization of...
2 Pages(500 words)Article

United States Supreme Court Case

...Case American Elec. Power CO. v. CONNECTICUT, No. 10-174 . The Supreme Court ruling and its effects on the future of greenhouse gas emissions aimed at protecting the environment. Citation: Supreme Court of the United States, cited on the 21st November, 2011 from: The facts The state of Connecticut has sought to curb the carbon gases emission citing that it was a nuisance to the public thus having drastic effects on business and employment in the electric power companies. The effects are drastic as a result of the increased global warming that has led to environmental...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Recent Supreme Court decisions 2014

... in handling of exceptional cases hence they were given discretion to handle those cases. The exceptional case reviewed by the Federal Circuit courts in examination of de novo and declined the ruling of the district court. Therefore, the Supreme Court decision in the case reversed the district court’s requirement that the petitioner pay attorney’s patent fees. Works Cited Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. Dutailier Int’l, Inc., 393 F. 3d 1378 Highmark Inc. V. Allcare Health Management, Inc PAROLINE V. UNITED STATES Et Al. PRADO NAVARETTE et al. v. CALIFORNIA Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U. S. 552... Recent Supreme Court Decisions PRADO NAVARETTE et al. v. CALIFORNIA Facts: In this...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Supreme Court Winery Decision the wine fabricating companies including chain stores, wholesalers and retailers (Bravin A1). The system reduced benefits since it boost unemployment in the United States. Although the decision might create new market niche for the country’s products, the benefits are enjoyed at the expense of collapse of local infant/inefficient industries. Question 2 Kantianism suggests that although some actions could bring about more happiness than the others could, there is a possibility of being prohibited. Based on this principle, the Supreme Court ruling was morally upright since it encouraged equality, transparency and fairness in the market. In fact, if...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court Decision

...of the Political Science of the Teacher 14 July Doe v. of Intrusia- Supreme Court Decision As per the wisdom and informed opinion of this Court of Law, the City of Intrusia no way violated the search and seizure protections enshrined in the Fourth Amendment by intercepting the text messages of the accused Joe Doe, and these text messages are aptly admissible in this Court as valid and credible evidence. This Court has ample reasons to set aside the appeal made by the accused, Joe Doe. The Fourth Amendment in its word and spirit intends to protect “The right of the people to be secure”, in the condition that they are subjected to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court of the United States

...process. Consequently, the use of race is not an isolated factor to selection and this undermines discrimination of applicants from minority races. The case of Grantz, however, fails to identify the ‘narrowly tailored’ application and instead offers advantage to applicants from minority races. This is because the university offers additional 20 percent points to applicants from minority races, a factor that makes race an isolated and significant factor to qualification. The ‘narrowly tailored’ concept therefore establishes constitutionality of the university’s provisions under the Grutter case but unconstitutionality under the Grantz case (Supreme Court of the United...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) for FREE!

Contact Us