Nobody downloaded yet

Discuss and evaluate the right of the parties to challenge an arbitral award on grounds of error of law in the context of the position taken in the United States (see, e.g., Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel, 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008)) and the review provisions o - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Mattel (2008)1 has left the legal world confused with contradictory views about the issue. Both the aspect of the decision is analysed with justification to extract the…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.8% of users find it useful
Discuss and evaluate the right of the parties to challenge an arbitral award on grounds of error of law in the context of the position taken in the United States (see, e.g., Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel, 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008)) and the review provisions o
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Discuss and evaluate the right of the parties to challenge an arbitral award on grounds of error of law in the context of the position taken in the United States (see, e.g., Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel, 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008)) and the review provisions o"

Download file to see previous pages Pursuant to Section 11, an award may be modified for: evident material miscalculation; evident material mistake; dealing with matters not submitted to the arbitrators; or imperfections not affecting the merits of the award.
In the course of a long span of jurisprudence the federal agencies were divided and split over the interpretation of these provisions, while some courts opined considering Sections 10 and 11 to be the exclusive grounds on weather to vacate or modify an award and others considered them as mere open to expansion by agreement. The debate continued and persisted and renewed as Hall Street made headlines in the courts, Federal Arbitration Act (2006)2.
Congress enacted federal Arbitration Act 1925 with the intention of settling disputes through arbitration. There are diverse views about the FAA’s post arbitration position for judicial review and weather the contracting parties can expand it. In the case of Hall Street Associates v. Mattel (2008)3, Inc. the Supreme Court held that 9-11 sections of FAA provide the exclusionary aspect of speedy judicial review of arbitration awards. The approach of courts many times has been minimalist. The resolution of the issue led to larger issues and disputes being remained unresolved. It led to a situation where the lower courts of late started to disagree with the narrow approach of the Supreme Court. Hall Street judgment creates a lot of ambiguity in the aspect of altered minimalism. Tenant Mattel leased a property for a manufacturing site from landlord Hall Street. There was a clause indemnifying Hall Street for any costs incurred by Mattel’s failure to follow environmental. In 1998, tests was carried out of the property’s well water and it revealed high levels of contaminations and other pollutants, and after three years, Mattel gave notice of with intention to terminate the lease. Hall Street filed suit in federal court, seeking ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Discuss and evaluate the right of the parties to challenge an arbitral Essay”, n.d.)
Discuss and evaluate the right of the parties to challenge an arbitral Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560378-discuss-and-evaluate-the-right-of-the-parties-to-challenge-an-arbitral-award-on-grounds-of-error-of-law-in-the-context-of-the-position-taken-in-the-united-states-see-eg-hall-street-assoc-v-mattel-128-s-ct-1396-2008-and-the-review-provisions-o
(Discuss and Evaluate the Right of the Parties to Challenge an Arbitral Essay)
Discuss and Evaluate the Right of the Parties to Challenge an Arbitral Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560378-discuss-and-evaluate-the-right-of-the-parties-to-challenge-an-arbitral-award-on-grounds-of-error-of-law-in-the-context-of-the-position-taken-in-the-united-states-see-eg-hall-street-assoc-v-mattel-128-s-ct-1396-2008-and-the-review-provisions-o.
“Discuss and Evaluate the Right of the Parties to Challenge an Arbitral Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560378-discuss-and-evaluate-the-right-of-the-parties-to-challenge-an-arbitral-award-on-grounds-of-error-of-law-in-the-context-of-the-position-taken-in-the-united-states-see-eg-hall-street-assoc-v-mattel-128-s-ct-1396-2008-and-the-review-provisions-o.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Discuss and evaluate the right of the parties to challenge an arbitral award on grounds of error of law in the context of the position taken in the United States (see, e.g., Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel, 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008)) and the review provisions o

Smith v. United States

...school law. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Eastland, T. (2000). Freedom of expression in the Supreme Court: The defining cases. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Farish, L. (1997). Tinker v. Des Moines: Student Protest. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers, Inc. Farish, L. (1998). The First Amendment: Freedom of Speech, Religion, and the Press. Hillside, NJ: Enslow Publishers, Inc. Gold, S. D. (2007). Tinker v. Des Moines: Free speech for students. Tarrytown, N.Y: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark. Lane, R. W. (1995). Beyond the schoolhouse gate: Free speech and the inculcation of values. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press. Stocks, J. D....
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

United States v. Wade

...?United s v. Wade A bank robbery on September 21, 1964 in Eustace, Texas led to the arrest of Billy Joe Wade and two others. As per the Miranda Rights of the accused, counsel was duly appointed to Wade in order to represent his legal interests. Two weeks after his arrest, Wade was placed in a line up with other similar looking men where the two employees who were present during the robbery positively identified Wade as one of the perpetrators. The witness identification procedure was undertaken by the FBI without considering the need of the accused to have legal counsel present. During the trial, Wade's legal counsel tried to get an acquittal for their client based upon their belief that the Fifth Amendment Rights of their client... ,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

United States v. Salerno

... until trial. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals found that pretrial detention based upon the possibility of future dangerousness to be unconstitutional and a deprivation of liberty. The government won during the appeal round at the U.S. Supreme Court (“United States v. Salerno”). The 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is based upon the English Bill of Rights, prohibits the application of excessive bail or fines, including cruel and unusual punishments. The right of bail is part of the U.S. Supreme Court belief in a person's right to traditional freedom prior to conviction. This law prevents the law enforcers from unlawfully holding an accused in jail for an indefinite period of time. This is the law that is used... ...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

United States v. Lopez

...was wrong (Fedorko, 2001). Initial decision The clause of the Gun-Free School Zones Act that prohibited possession of firearms within school premises or within 1,000 ft. of a school falls under section 922(q). Alphonso’s appeal to dismiss the case was rejected by the District Court on the grounds that s 922(q) is a “constitutional exercise of Congress’ power to regulate activities in and affecting commerce” (United States v. Lopez, 2013). Going against this decision of the court, it was held by the Court of Appeals that there was not enough “congressional findings and legislative history” (United States...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

LAW CASE (sheapard v. united states)

...Shepard v. United s, 290 U.S. 96, 104 (1933). School Introduction Major Charles A Shepard of the United s Army was convicted of murdering his wife Zenana Shepard at Fort Riley Kansas. Shepard was accused of murdering his wife by poisoning her with Bichloride of Mercury. The motive seemed to be that Major Shepard was in love with another woman and wanted to make to be with this woman. Major Shepard was sentenced to imprisonment for life without capital punishment. The initial judgment was declared through the United States District Court and affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Shepard claims his wife's...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Begay v. United States

...Violent Felonies: The Case of Begay v USA Begay vs. United s (2008) Facts In September of 2004, New Mexico police received a report that Larry Begay, the petitioner in the case had brandished a gun to his sister threatening to kill her and her aunt. Begay entered a guilty plea to a federal charge for illegal possession of firearm in contravention of The Armed Career Criminal Act, ACCA (1984), which prescribes a mandatory 15-year jail term for all convicted felons, found to unlawfully bear firearms. Begay had initially been charged and convicted 12 times for driving under influence (DUI), which in the jurisdiction of New Mexico laws is a felony punishable...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

United States v. Angevine

...Running head: business United s v Angevine Barring (very unlikely) explicit assurances of privacy from the company, should an employee have any expectation of privacy while in the workplace? Ideally, companies provide technology and related infrastructure to help its employees deliver better performance and results. It is very rare that companies provide such facilities as complementary benefits to its employees. Complements from companies usually include other kinds of gift items, remuneration etc, and not IT-related equipment. Equipments such as computers, laptops, phones etc provided by the company accompany their usage regulations and are, thus, monitored for usage. All companies...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

HALL v. UNITED STATES ANALYSIS

...HALL v. UNITED S ANALYSIS The case Hall v. number 10-875 was an appeal case in the court of appeal of United States on 16th day of August 2010 ( Carrizales &. Schultz 2010). The case was about bankruptcy in the 12th Chapter of the U.S.A laws. The case involved a tax claim application of $29,000 after the sale of the petitioner’s family farm. The content of the case is relevant to the scope of this course. It elaborates on chapter 12 of the U.S laws on Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the guidelines followed upon declaration of one’s bankruptcy and forced to sell his or...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

United States v. Jones

... and decision. Works Cited Arcila, Fabio, Junior. "GPS Tracking Out of Fourth Amendment Dead Ends: United States v. Jones and the Katz Conundrum". (2012). North Carolina Law Review 91(1): 1–59. Clancy, Thomas K.. The Fourth Amendment: its history and interpretation. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press, 2008. Print. McDonald, P., & Means, R. (2012).Supreme Court rules on GPS tracking case. Washington D.C: Elsevier Mosby. Taslitz, Andrew E.. Reconstructing the Fourth Amendment: a history of search and seizure, 1789-1868. New York: New York University Press, 2006. Print. Wetterer, Charles M.. The Fourth Amendment: search and seizure. Springfield, NJ: Enslow Publishers, 1998. Print.... United s...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Environmental Law Court: United States v Bestfoods

..., so business is not paralyzed by confusion about where lines of responsibility are drawn. I think the Court did not overreach and certainly kept CERCLA as a vital tool for ecological health and enforcement. Works Cited Docstoc. United States v. Bestfoods: Case Brief. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/302160/United-States- v-Bestfoods-Case-Brief Jrank. United States v. Bestfoods - Significance, Don't Drink The Water, Shifting The Burden To The Responsible Parties, A Question Of Parenthood. http://law.jrank.org/pages/13474/United-States- v-Bestfoods.html United States v. Bestfoods. 97-454. 113 F.3d 572....  I.United States v. Bestfoods II. The United States Supreme Court III....
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Discuss and evaluate the right of the parties to challenge an arbitral award on grounds of error of law in the context of the position taken in the United States (see, e.g., Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel, 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008)) and the review provisions o for FREE!

Contact Us