This house support mandatory vaccinations - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Preview of the debate to come: In my part of the debate, I will refute the previous speaker’s argument, extend my partner’s argument and finally add an argument of my own and tell you why you should vote for us.
Refutation: I disagree with this point because the government…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.7% of users find it useful
This house support mandatory vaccinations
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "This house support mandatory vaccinations"

This House Support Mandatory Vaccinations Motion: This house supports mandatory vaccination. In- Debate Written Outline (Second Speaker: First Government)
Member Government
Section One: Introduction
Opening Statements – Thank You’s
1) Judge: I would like to thank the judges for being here today.
2) Opponents: I would like to thank the opposition for debating with us.
3) Partner: I would like to thank my partner along with my bench for being here.
4) Peanut Gallery: Lastly, I would like to thank the peanut gallery for attending.
Preview of the debate to come: In my part of the debate, I will refute the previous speaker’s argument, extend my partner’s argument and finally add an argument of my own and tell you why you should vote for us.
Section Two: Refuting opponent’s claim.
Argument tag Line: Government should not be involved in medical decisions and we should have personal freedom in making the choice to be vaccinated.
Refutation: I disagree with this point because the government only wants what is best for its citizens. People vote in the government that they trust will do everything in its power to protect them. It should also be noted that the government consults qualified medical practitioners concerning decisions to issues such as vaccination. Finally, personal freedom should be directed if one’s life or other people’s lives are in danger. This is where the government steps in with the interests of the general well being of the citizens in heart.
Section Three: Supporting my partner.
Argument Tag Line: Vaccinations prevent the spread of diseases.
Claim: Vaccines activate the body’s natural defenses putting the body on alert mode.
Evidence: Vaccines help bring forth white blood cells to the invading area faster than they are normally produced. The vaccines also inject antibodies to help kill the bacteria.
Citation: Collier in his book ‘Vaccines’, 2004, explains that vaccines work to prime the immune system against future attacks by a particular disease. This disease could be either viral, bacterial, or any other disease causing agents. When a pathogen enters the body, the immune system generates antibodies to try to fight it off. In case of exposure to the same pathogen in the then or in the future, the antibodies will recognize it and fight it off.
Interpretation: This is to mean that the individual has immunity against the disease he or she is vaccinated against. This is good since exposure to a disease common in a particular area means that he or she will not get infected therefore preventing its spread.
Evidence: Natural immunity is long lasting from that gained from vaccination. This, however, does not mean that its advantages outweigh those of vaccination.
Citation: Merino’s book ‘Should Vaccinations be Mandatory’ clearly states that the risks of natural infection outweigh those of immunization for each recommended vaccine. An example; a wild measles infection causes inflammation of the brain for 1 in every 1,000 infected persons. In general, measles infection results in the death of 2 out of every 1,000 infected persons. However, the combination of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine results in a severe allergic reaction only once in every million vaccinated persons at the same time preventing the spread and infection of measles.
Interpretation: This shows that the benefits of the immunity of vaccinations in preventing infection and spread of diseases are far much greater than the serious risks of natural immunity.
Section Four: Argument to support Motion.
Argument Line: Vaccination promotes immigration safety.
Claim: Travelers are prevented from diseases that they might be exposed to when they travel.
Evidence: With the global air travel increasing, there is an equal rise in the risk of exposure to infectious diseases abroad. Other travelers transmit and disseminate disease like in the case of polio and the dispersal of meningococcal strains by the returning pilgrims from Saudi Arabia. In the case of the Muslim Hajj, local authorities require vaccination from this disease and other forms of vaccinations like influenza and hepatitis B, for pilgrims.
Citation: Hoveyda’s journal, ‘More Travel Advice and fewer Vaccinations are Needed’ states that the most common vaccine-preventable diseases among travelers are influenza and hepatitis A. others considered are rabies, hepatitis B, typhoid, cholera, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, and measles. Most vaccines are given with flexible accelerated schedules to ensure early protection. Therefore, the traveler is always protected while traveling at his or her own convenience.
Interpretation: This is to mean that vaccines will always promote safe travel and mobility without the fear or risk of infection.
Evidence: One can never travel anywhere without the vaccination since there is increased rate of either being infected or causing infections to those in the places, they travel.
Citation: Crum and Jacobs in their journal, New Immigration Requirements for Students in U.S. who are not U.S. citizens, explain the constitution, which states that under the immigration laws of the United States, any foreign national who applies for an immigrant visa abroad, or seeks to adjust status to a permanent resident while in the United States, is required to receive vaccinations to prevent the following diseases such as mumps, measles, rubella, polio, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, perussis, Haemophilus influenza type B, hepatitis B or any other vaccine-preventable diseases recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.
Interpretation: This means that there will always be a need to visit a doctor before traveling just to make sure travelers are not in the risk of infection.
Section Five: Concluding Statement
1) In my speech, I have refuted my opponent’s statement. I have also extended my teammate’s argument that vaccinations prevent the spread of diseases. I have also brought forth the idea of immigration safety and it being a requirement by the government where everyone needs to obey the state requirements.
2) I finally want to say that vaccination saves lives and prevents pandemics. People should always consider their well-being as they travel and understand the risks of not being vaccinated.
3) You my audience, should vote for us and assist in promoting the vaccination of individuals and children as the best way to prevent the spread of diseases.
Section six: References
Collier, J. (2004). Vaccines. New York: Benchmark Books.
Crum, E., & Jacobs, J. (2003). New Immigration Requirements for Students in U.S. Who are not U.S. Citizens. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 84(6), 50. Doi:10.1029/2003eo060004
Hoveyda, N. (2003). More travel advice and fewer vaccinations are needed. BMJ, 326(7379), 52a-52. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7379.52/a
Merino, N. (2010). Should vaccinations be mandatory? Detroit: Green haven Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“This house support mandatory vaccinations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
This house support mandatory vaccinations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from
(This House Support Mandatory Vaccinations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
This House Support Mandatory Vaccinations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words.
“This House Support Mandatory Vaccinations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF This house support mandatory vaccinations

Mandatory Influenza Vaccinations for Health Care Workers

...? Mandatory Influenza Vaccinations for Health Care Workers Mandatory Influenza Vaccinations for Health Care Workers The purpose of this paper is to examine why influenza vaccination should be compulsory among health workers. Being contagious disease that is passed from one person to the next, necessary measures should be taken to prevent it from spreading. The paper has discussed the reasons behind influenza immunization and areas in which it has caused death to are numbers of people. Some of the worldwide health organizations that have made it a compulsory practice and a condition of employment have been listed. Finally, the paper has discussed national...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Do vaccinations cause autism

... that were once caused to human race by these viruses, tend to believe that vaccinations is just a step towards destructive artificial support system for life. They focus on apparent risks and damages that are claimed to have been caused by vaccination such as autism. People take for granted what they cannot see and do not consider the opportunity costs of avoiding diseases through vaccinations which they believe don’t even exist. In today’s world where people have reasoning minds and skeptical views about anything and everything, it is virtually impossible to expect them to trust pharmaceutical manufacturers, doctors, health-promoting bodies and the overall science of saving lives. Autism is so widely believed to be a by-product... . This...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Childhood Vaccinations

...Introduction I have observed a long withstanding controversy on the mandatory childhood vaccinations and the optional vaccinations. Mandatory vaccinations are vaccinations that are given to the children involuntarily as a set rule and also regulation by the health sector. On the other hand the optional vaccinations are available for every child on based on the parent's preferences. The optional vaccinations are not made mandatory to every child but they concerned parties are further given the liberty to choose on what they like and prefer best. On my part I would support the mandatory vaccinations since in the past they have had positive effects on the health of the children and if the vaccinations would be made optional most... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Childhood Vaccinations

...Table of contents …………………………………………………..2 Introduction…………………………………………………3 Research problem……………………………………………3 Research methodology……………………………………...4 Theoretical framework………………………………………4 Research design……………………………………………...5 Instruments…………………………………………………...5 Procedures……………………………………………………6 Conclusion……………………………………………………6 Abstract The present paper is devoted to the subject of childhood vaccinations in relation to the possible complications, with the searching of general conclusion, if these vaccinations are really needed. The work is the proposal for the research in terms of childhood vaccination, with the recommendations for the design of the work, possible methods of analysis and the validity of the results... ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper


...Vaccinations Vaccinations • Why do vaccinations, such as the flu shot, not provide protection to a person for his or her entire lifetime? Vaccination refers to the administration of antigens aimed at stimulating the immune system of an individual against diseases. In other words, vaccination boosts the body’s immune system. Through vaccination, the body builds an immune response to pathogens. A vaccine therefore enables the body to detect pathogens and buid antibodies to fight against them. However, the protection does not last a life-time. Whilst vaccines accelerate the release of antibodies to fight the...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

Mandatory vaccinations

...Mandatory Vaccination Recently a controversy regarding mandatory vaccinations has been common. Concerns have been raised about the risks inherent risks associated with the medical procedure. Proponents of the procedure point out that the risk of death or injury is inconsequential and rare compared to its benefits to societal and the individual. However, growing evidence suggests that the practice may actually cause health problems, as well as the realization that there is denial of the right to informed consent. An increasing number of concerned individuals and parents have begun to demand the addressing of questions regarding safety and appropriateness of the procedure...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Childhood vaccinations

...are far greater than they are telling us, and there are no mandatory vaccines...doctors cannot guarantee the safety of vaccines or that they will even work. Many vaccinations fail to achieve their intended level of immunity and many cause horrible complications (including death) which one will have to suffer for the rest of their life (Mercola). Such observations are not scientifically backed and lack evidence. Firstly, vaccines are safe as they are rigorously tested and licensed. If vaccines were really harmful, then a large number of children worldwide should have taken ill. There should have been widespread cases of disease breakouts...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Childhood vaccinations

...writes, “I found it very frustrating to have an active mind in a permanently disabled body” (Gillan 1). Many individuals suffer from completely preventable diseases that could have been avoided if they were vaccinated in childhood. The very fact that a disease as preventable as polio was allowed to ruin so many lives makes it unbearable. Despite the awareness on immunizations and vaccinations, the multi-million dollar investments made by governments on vaccinations, the free camps and vaccination drives organized every day, there are many who fail to get their children immunized or are too scared to do so. Thesis Failure to get children immunized puts them at risk of...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Public safety - mandatory vaccinations on school chilldren (also need outline)-

...Mandatory Vaccinations on Schoolchildren Mandatory Vaccinations on Schoolchildren Philips vs. New York Generally, the Public HealthLaw 2164 claims that no official in any school should admit students in the school for more than two weeks without an immunization certificate. However, the law allows at least one exemption in the case where a physician verifies that the immunization may be risky to the health of the child. The second immunization exemption is where the parents of the child have sincere and genuine religious beliefs that are contrary to immunization. In reference to Philips vs. New York, Plaintiffs Nicole Phillips, Dina Check and Fabian Mendoza-Vaca...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

This house support mandatory vaccinations

...Motion: This house support mandatory vaccination Section One: Introduction Opening ments-Thank You Judge: Am happy to see-to-see you present today, How take this chance to thank the judges for their time. 2) First speaker: I would like to concentrate the second speaker for allowing time to debate with us. 3) Opponents: I would like to thank my opponents for arriving and being ready to find give the much you have. Previews of the debate to come: From the previous speaker it clear that mandatory vaccination is of high importance to children hence as the government , we have well made adequate strategies and goals to accomplish in order to fulfill the objectives, I would also like to extend my gratitude to my fellow partner... that...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic This house support mandatory vaccinations for FREE!

Contact Us