This house support mandatory vaccinations - Essay Example

This House Support Mandatory Vaccinations Motion: This house supports mandatory vaccination. In- Debate Written Outline (Second Speaker: First Government)Member GovernmentSection One: IntroductionOpening Statements – Thank You’s1) Judge: I would like to thank the judges for being here today.2) Opponents: I would like to thank the opposition for debating with us.3) Partner: I would like to thank my partner along with my bench for being here.4) Peanut Gallery: Lastly, I would like to thank the peanut gallery for attending.

Preview of the debate to come: In my part of the debate, I will refute the previous speaker’s argument, extend my partner’s argument and finally add an argument of my own and tell you why you should vote for us. Section Two: Refuting opponent’s claim.Argument tag Line: Government should not be involved in medical decisions and we should have personal freedom in making the choice to be vaccinated.Refutation: I disagree with this point because the government only wants what is best for its citizens.

People vote in the government that they trust will do everything in its power to protect them. It should also be noted that the government consults qualified medical practitioners concerning decisions to issues such as vaccination. Finally, personal freedom should be directed if one’s life or other people’s lives are in danger. This is where the government steps in with the interests of the general well being of the citizens in heart.Section Three: Supporting my partner.Argument Tag Line: Vaccinations prevent the spread of diseases.

Claim: Vaccines activate the body’s natural defenses putting the body on alert mode.Evidence: Vaccines help bring forth white blood cells to the invading area faster than they are normally produced. The vaccines also inject antibodies to help kill the bacteria.Citation: Collier in his book ‘Vaccines’, 2004, explains that vaccines work to prime the immune system against future attacks by a particular disease. This disease could be either viral, bacterial, or any other disease causing agents.

When a pathogen enters the body, the immune system generates antibodies to try to fight it off. In case of exposure to the same pathogen in the then or in the future, the antibodies will recognize it and fight it off.Interpretation: This is to mean that the individual has immunity against the disease he or she is vaccinated against. This is good since exposure to a disease common in a particular area means that he or she will not get infected therefore preventing its spread.Evidence: Natural immunity is long lasting from that gained from vaccination.

This, however, does not mean that its advantages outweigh those of vaccination.Citation: Merino’s book ‘Should Vaccinations be Mandatory’ clearly states that the risks of natural infection outweigh those of immunization for each recommended vaccine. An example; a wild measles infection causes inflammation of the brain for 1 in every 1,000 infected persons. In general, measles infection results in the death of 2 out of every 1,000 infected persons. However, the combination of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine results in a severe allergic reaction only once in every million vaccinated persons at the same time preventing the spread and infection of measles.

Interpretation: This shows that the benefits of the immunity of vaccinations in preventing infection and spread of diseases are far much greater than the serious risks of natural immunity.Section Four: Argument to support Motion.Argument Line: Vaccination promotes immigration safety.Claim: Travelers are prevented from diseases that they might be exposed to when they travel.Evidence: With the global air travel increasing, there is an equal rise in the risk of exposure to infectious diseases abroad.

Other travelers transmit and disseminate disease like in the case of polio and the dispersal of meningococcal strains by the returning pilgrims from Saudi Arabia. In the case of the Muslim Hajj, local authorities require vaccination from this disease and other forms of vaccinations like influenza and hepatitis B, for pilgrims.Citation: Hoveyda’s journal, ‘More Travel Advice and fewer Vaccinations are Needed’ states that the most common vaccine-preventable diseases among travelers are influenza and hepatitis A.

others considered are rabies, hepatitis B, typhoid, cholera, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, and measles. Most vaccines are given with flexible accelerated schedules to ensure early protection. Therefore, the traveler is always protected while traveling at his or her own convenience.Interpretation: This is to mean that vaccines will always promote safe travel and mobility without the fear or risk of infection.Evidence: One can never travel anywhere without the vaccination since there is increased rate of either being infected or causing infections to those in the places, they travel.

Citation: Crum and Jacobs in their journal, New Immigration Requirements for Students in U.S. who are not U.S. citizens, explain the constitution, which states that under the immigration laws of the United States, any foreign national who applies for an immigrant visa abroad, or seeks to adjust status to a permanent resident while in the United States, is required to receive vaccinations to prevent the following diseases such as mumps, measles, rubella, polio, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, perussis, Haemophilus influenza type B, hepatitis B or any other vaccine-preventable diseases recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.

Interpretation: This means that there will always be a need to visit a doctor before traveling just to make sure travelers are not in the risk of infection. Section Five: Concluding Statement1) In my speech, I have refuted my opponent’s statement. I have also extended my teammate’s argument that vaccinations prevent the spread of diseases. I have also brought forth the idea of immigration safety and it being a requirement by the government where everyone needs to obey the state requirements.2) I finally want to say that vaccination saves lives and prevents pandemics.

People should always consider their well-being as they travel and understand the risks of not being vaccinated.3) You my audience, should vote for us and assist in promoting the vaccination of individuals and children as the best way to prevent the spread of diseases.Section six: ReferencesCollier, J. (2004). Vaccines. New York: Benchmark Books.Crum, E., & Jacobs, J. (2003). New Immigration Requirements for Students in U.S. Who are not U.S. Citizens. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 84(6), 50.

Doi:10.1029/2003eo060004Hoveyda, N. (2003). More travel advice and fewer vaccinations are needed. BMJ, 326(7379), 52a-52. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7379.52/aMerino, N. (2010). Should vaccinations be mandatory? Detroit: Green haven Press.