Critical analysis worksheet - Essay Example

Critical Analysis Worksheet 2 Rui Deng In your own words, explain the main points of the article (should be at least 100 words, provide some detail).Article 1: It has become popular for many news media outlets to hire in "experts" to provide an opinion about an issue. News journalism is meant to be objective as possible so as to give the viewer a chance to make up their own mind. The problem with hiring in "experts" for guest appearances is that they have some sort of angle that they wish to impart to the viewer.

This can lead a news outlet to become biased if it only hires commentators of a particular political persuasion. In order to prevent bias from occurring, some news outlets are beginning to inform the viewer of who the guest commentator works for or represents.Article 2: It is ridiculous to say that money does not influence politics these days. The argument that the number of people who believe that money can change the course of politics is comparable to the few people who believe in global warming is not a solid argument.

The former Federal Elections Commission chairman Bradley Smith talks about evidence, yet he does not give any. Democracy was founded on the basis that every person had the right to choose government, yet the vast influx of money has completely eroded this process. Campaigns have taken on such importance that they are all politicians ever seem to do, instead of focusing on real policies that will better the country. 2. What questions would you ask the author (at least 2 questions) with the freedom of press?

Article 1: The first question I would ask would be: Are these guest appearances initiated by the guest or the network. The second question would be: Are guests paid for their appearances, and if so is there a budget for this?Article 2: The first question is: When did money begin to influence politics? Second question is: What laws have been changed to allow lobbyists to dictate policy in Washington? 3. Do you agree with the main premise of the reading? Why or why not? What evidence or personal experience would you offer?

Article 1: I do agree with the main premise of the reading because I know that big corporate have the money and political influence to be able to secure guest appearances on these cable networks. I have seen it happen many times where a guest commentator refuses to consider the other side of the argument, so they obviously have some sort of bias.Article 2: I do agree that money now seems to control politics in a way like never before. Just last year I saw hundreds of political ads on TV. These ads must have cost millions of dollars, but the reason they were shown so much is because lobbyists wanted to get their candidate elected.4. What from the reading do you think we should discuss in class?

(Either because you agree, disagree, or need clarification)Article 1: I think that we should discuss the emergence of these lobby groups and global corporate that are able to influence the voting public so much. Democracy should be about freedom of opinion, but sometimes it seems like we only get to hear one point of view, and it may not necessarily be the best point of view.Article 2: I think that we should discuss how democracy has evolved from when the founding fathers first wrote the constitution to what it is now.

Why has only recently money started to become important in an election.