Organization development - Essay Example

Organization Development al Affiliation) Apex Oil Spill Decision FormShut down offshore drillingMy decision. Offshore drilling should be shut down, as it is harmful to the environment by endangering the wildlife and pollution that result to health hazards.Team Decision. Shutdown of offshore drilling will lead to a major blow to the growth of the economy. In addition, taxation, citizens will be required to pay more taxes to cater for government expenditure. Shut down production pending investigations of all platformsMy decision.

Engineers will be able to do proper investigations about the conditions and machineries used in the drilling process, to determine if they are well maintained and the remaining lifespan of the machinery.Team Decision. This will lead to loss of income by the state and economy as a whole. Shut down of only platforms involved in the spill.My decision. Shutdown of one platform will not be sufficient for investigations to be efficient and transparent. Investigations should be done on all platforms.

Team Decision. Shutdown of the platform involved will prevent a significant loss of the income by the state. As a result, citizen’s taxes will not be highly increased. Shut down affected areas for 18 months.My decision. 18 months are not sufficient for the cleanup of the area. According to the research done, it shows that it may take about four years for beaches to be back to normal. On the other hand, fish production will take longer given the extent of the damage caused by the spill.Team Decision.

Analysis of the findings by the engineers, clean up exercise for the wildlife and beached will take longer than 18 months. State goes to court to force Apex to Pay.My decision. APEX should pay for both direct and indirect costs. Their assumption of the leakage is pure negligence and not an accident. Losses suffered by the state, environment, and the population should be covered. Team Decision. State should force apex to pay. Negligence should not be tolerated by the state. The negative impacts that resulted in the spill should have been avoided if the company had adhered to the alarm and if the routine maintenance had been done.

For these reasons, the company should be forced to pay for all the damages caused.