Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/human-resources/1663958-case
https://studentshare.org/human-resources/1663958-case.
The candidate should have either signed the contract and accepted the job offered by company X instead of accepting verbally only to retract later. On the other hand, The Candidate should have ignored the job offered by X and gone for Y (Catano 2009, p. 283).
After a critical analysis, I would make a decision. I would not accept a job offer either verbally or through a contract until I have made an appropriate decision.4. Did company Y act ethically, knowing that the candidate had verbally accepted another offer? Company Y acted ethically in the sense that for them accepting a job meant signing a contract and not through verbal commitments (Catano 2009, p. 283). A contract has legal implications, ties an employee to the job, and shows a wider commitment to the job offered. 5. Does a verbal acceptance constitute a legal and binding contract?
Verbal acceptance does not constitute a legal and binding contract because it does not manifest any evidence or is committed by an individual. 6. What should the candidate's mentor have advised him to do? The mentor should have advised the individual to do a personal assessment of the companies and settle on one based on the level of satisfaction.7. Should company X take any action against the candidate or company Y? Why or Why not? A company should not take any action against company Y or the candidate.
The case in point is that the candidate had nothing legally binding him to Company X, and therefore, no proceedings can be initiated against the two parties.8. How can situations like this be avoided? Situations like this can be avoided by having legal agreements that bind parties into an agreement. On the other hand, companies should provide better benefits for candidates taking the jobs to avoid second thoughts. 9. Describe what company X should have done to maintain the candidate's interest in the position.
Company X should have followed up on the candidate and persuaded him to sign the contract. Secondly, the company should have improved on the offer by ensuing further benefits.
Read More