Download file to see previous pages...
Dell envisioned a great opportunity in the computing technology and decided to provide customers with computers at affordable prices and efficiently. He started off with a thousand dollars and saw technology as a means of increasing people’s potential. Dell’s vision was to design, manufacture and sell great computers that were affordable to every individual. He wanted to enhance the process of purchasing computers and through his vision he was able to redefine the manner in which personal computers were sold. In 1994, Dell became the youngest Chief Executive Officer of a Fortune 500 company by keeping to his vision and leading his company to great heights (Krivda 22).
Alan Sugar was able to build Amstrad, a company that dealt with consumer electronics by establishing authority and giving clear goals and objectives to his employees. Sugar is a commanding leader who indicates the direction that the company should take and does not consult his subordinates on any issue concerning the company’s dealings. While at the age of twenty one, Alan Sugar saw various opportunities in the electronics’ business (Sugar 3). He grew up in an impoverished part of Britain and envisioned being rich, thus focusing on a successful path by taking the lead role and focusing the company in the direction that he wanted. His vision also encompasses the value of customers as he notes that the customers are always right and therefore, seeks to provide quality products and services. He directs his employees in a way that will ensure profitability for his business as he seeks to reward the employees that meet their goals and punishes those that do not. He steers the business to success by asserting authority on the employees and setting goals that the employee must meet. Sugar’s vision is not limited to a certain business field as he also likes to diversify by starting
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Traditional conceptualizations categorized leadership styles into three distinct categories. These are: democratic, autocratic and laissez-faire. This categorization is greatly associated with Kurt Lewin and his fellow researchers (Hill & McShane, 2006). Different situations require different leadership styles.
Leadership is the ability to lead a group of people or an organization. In essence, it involves the establishment of a clear vision, with a clear vivid picture of the destination, and a grasp of success and how to attain it. Secondly, the vision should be shared with others so that they can willingly follow (Northouse, 2009).
Defining the characteristics is indeed a complex process as it associates the notion of solution to diverse problems with varying intensity. In today’s world of cut throat competitive business environment organizational leadership is a huge area of study because proper leadership can uplift the performance of an organization from grass root levels to sky rocketed acceleration.
Leadership style: Autocratic. In this case, an urgent need to lay off followers is needed to avoid further dropping of company’s revenue. It needs a leadership that overrides emotional connection between the leader and the followers to avoid degeneration of
Many of these leaders have accomplishments and they have records in history as being some of the most remarkable leaders (Lussier and Achua, 2009). For example, Malcolm X was one of last century’s most pragmatic of leaders and his deeds are thus
This is understanding and controlling one’s emotions in equal proportion to understanding the emotional state of others. La Toya Jackson was fired from the show in 2011. La Toya allowed her ego to drive her
Democratic style of leadership is the direction which law enforcement leaders ought to take. Superior law enforcement leaders necessitate taking long-term, tactical views when mounting budgets as well as policies.