Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The paper "The Cold War as a Historical Conflict" describes that the cold war has often been defined as a challenge between democracy and communism and although this was to some extent true, the US did however sponsor some distinctly undemocratic and authoritarian practices…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "The Cold War as a Historical Conflict"
Cold War The cold war was a conflict that took place between the mid and the late 2oth century between the united states of America and the USSR which were by then the world’s two great superpowers (Peacock, 1982). The struggle involved both sides and their respective allies and it involved both political economic, technological and military issue, however the core difference was political as both the US and Russia tried to sell their ideologies to their own and each other’s allies (Atomic Archive, n.d). The battle was between capitalism which was proposed and followed by the US and communism by the soviets; in Europe, the US led the NATO side while the signatories of the Warsaw pact comprised on the European communists and pro-soviet faction. The reason behind the name cold war was because the two chief combatants America and Russia never actually took each other on in a direct fight or “hot” war as the real battles within the war were referred to. Instead, they would each assist the opponents of the other and provide them with arms and financial support adopting the approach that “the enemy of your enemy is your friend.
Some people would refer to it as the third world war but in those times it was called the cold war under the premise that there was not direct confrontation between USSR and Russia (Brown, 2012). In the aftermath of the Second World War, the USA and Russia were left as the two most dominant powers in the world; however their modes of governance were radically different with the US practicing capitalist democracy while the USSR was a communist dictatorship. They competed to recruit as many nations as possible to their ideological camp with the US restoring democracy to its allies as the USSR on the other hand tried to turn its ‘liberated lands’ to soviet satellites. The west and Eastern bloc both feared each other, the US especially lived in fear of a communist invasion both in the physical and ideological sense, to mitigate against the possibility, they came up with the Truman doctrine which involved bailing out collapsing economies that were making it possible for communist sympathizers to gain power. By 1951, Europe was divided into two power blocks each lead by one of the superpower and they all had atomic weapons and significant resources, this resulted in the cold war, which finally culminated into a nuclear standoff. The first actual standoff between the two powers was witnessed during the Berlin blockade, this was post war Germany. The division of Germany into four parts necessitated the blocked and the blockade was used by the soviets to deny the US access into their part of Germany. However the allied air lifted their supplies over the blockade and they bluffed that Stalin would never attempt to shoot at them because he would not have wanted to start a hot war.
After the death of Stalin, in 1953, hopes of a thaw in the relations between the two powers were raised but soon shattered after the Budapest rises in 1956, the communist state of Hungary, which was faced with an uprising forcing the troops to leave the city. The Russians reacted by sending red army troops to take over the city and then put in a new government, the west was highly critical of this action but since they were distracted by the crisis at the Suez canal they did not take any steps.
Khrushchev feared that the US and the west would resurrect West Germany and use its power to destabilize the soviet position; he offered a concession in exchange of the return of a single and united Germany. The talks for this were set to be held in Italy but they were derailed by an incident in which Russian forces shot down a US U-2 spy plane over her territory. This incidence served Khrushchev with an excuse to renege on the deal he planned on offering the Americans as he was being accused by his detractors back home for giving too much. After the shooting, he withdrew from the talks and with him talk of a unified Germany faded. Leaders in East Germany took radial steps to prevent refugees from running away to the east by putting up the berlin wall that acted as physical barrier between the west and the East Germany. In addition, it acted as symbolic barrier between the allies and the soviets and it was not until the conflict between the two had come to an end that the wall was finally pulled down (Peacock, 1982). One of the main competitions that underscored the cold war was the nuclear race, American experts had predicted that the Soviet Union would not have the capacity for nuclear bombs until the mid-50s and it came as a shock to the world when Russia detonated its first nuclear bomb in 1949. Both the US and USSR governments spent a great deal of money on increasing the quality and quantity of their nuclear arsenal, the US detonated the first hydrogen bomb in 1952(Fleming, 1961), once again the soviets who during this period were viewed as underdogs surprised the world by also building their own deployable thermal nuclear device.
The nuclear arms race lasted up to until the end of the cold war but none of the measures taken by both sides could guarantee security, at the end of the day, they had enough firepower to obliterate other (Brinkley, Current, Freidel & Williams, 1991). The both had the capability to launch devastating nuclear strikes on each other through submarines, which was called a second strike; the policy was dubbed mutual assured destruction, (MAD) which meant that none of them could attack the other without devastating themselves in return. While both sides hoped they could use their weapons to extract concessions from other powerful nations such as China (Van, 1993), they were force to acknowledge that this may be too dangerous and they refrained. In the 80’s it appeared that Russia was winning since it had a considerably better and more productive economy as well as a more effective and numerous missiles (May, 2013). This was despite the fact that their economy was built on propaganda and corruption was deep seated. The US feared that Russian domination and made moves to re-arm and built up their defensive forces, these efforts involved placing missiles strategically in Europe and the defense spending was vastly expanded by President Reagan. When Brezhnev died in 1982, his successor Mikhail Gorbachev who took over power in 1985, realized that the USSR was crumbling and the Russian satellites were negatively affecting the economy and stability of the Russian itself (English, 2013). He decided to end the cold war and gave up the satellite states, after he agreed with the US to reduce the quantity of nuclear weapons; he spoke to the UN clarifying to the assembly that he was renouncing the Brezhnev Doctrine (Evangelista, 2002). It has been claimed that although the nuclear confrontation almost resulted in the destruction of vast parts of the world, this threats were mostly outside Europe and the hot wars were mostly in Vietnam and Korea (Kissinger and Wellings, 1969).
Therefore, it is worth noting that the cold war was mostly in Europe but they enjoyed a period of relative peace and stability compared to the early 1900’s. The cold War has often been defined as a challenge between democracy and communism and although this was to some extent true, the US did however sponsor some distinctly undemocratic and authoritarian practices with the intention of denying Russia access to some countries.
References
Atomic Archive. n.d. Cold War: A Brief History. Available at: http://www.atomicarchive.com/History/coldwar/index.shtml
Brinkley, A., Current, R. N., Freidel, F., & Williams, T. H. 1991. American history: A survey. New York. McGraw-Hill.
Brown, A. 2012. Reform, Coup and Collapse: The End of the Soviet State. BBC History. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/coldwar/soviet_end_01.shtml
English, R. D. 2013. Russia and the Idea of the West: Gorbachev, Intellectuals, and the End of the Cold War. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Evangelista, M. 2002. Unarmed forces: The transnational movement to end the cold war. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Fleming, D. F. 1961. The Cold War and Its Origins: 1917-1960. 1950-1960(Vol. 2). Doubleday.
Kissinger, H., & Wellings, V. 1969. American foreign policy (pp. 117-18). Royal Victorian Institute for the Blind Tertiary Resource Service..
May, E. R. 2013. John F Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis. BBC History. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/coldwar/kennedy_cuban_missile_01.shtml
Peacock, H, L. 1982. A history of modern europe 1789-1981. London. Heinemann
Van, C. M. 1993. Nuclear proliferation and the future of conflict. New York, United States: Free Press
Read
More
Share:
CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Cold War as a Historical Conflict
History cites such evolutional wars as the First World War, Second World War and the cold war among many others as having erupted from such differences in territorial power, economic empowerment and also political or military endowment of the incumbent countries.... In particular, the cold war of late 1940's to 1990's have seen the common play of the different tools as mentioned to realize solution to the conflict and reconstruction of the affected countries and regions after solution was found....
Identification and Description of the Iraq War The Iraq War was an armed conflict that took place beginning in Iraq in 2003.... This angered much of the public and made many Americans feel like they were tricked into going into an armed conflict without all of the available evidence laid before them first.... Although 9/11 is traditionally associated with the main reasons for why Bush began his 'war on terror,' another reason that many people feel he went to war with Iraq was to settle an old score with Saddam Hussein for having engaged in conflict with his father (Bush 41) in Operation Desert Storm....
The writer says that Detente is crafted by superpowers to manage the cold war as suited to both sides.... the cold war CONTEXT the cold war period started from World War –II onwards in 1945 till the end of USSR in 1989.... SYNOPSIS the cold war; A New History (Gaddis) is a new book written by John Lewis Gaddis in 2006.... The book develops character of the cold war from nuclear attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by USA....
These circumstances underlie the historical conflict between Israel and Iran and how their leaders' mindsets and biases can impact peace or war in the future.... The paper "Israel and Iran: cold war Years" states that Israel wants to reduce all potential threats using all means possible.... he paper explores the causes and consequences of the ongoing shadow conflict between Iran and Israel, also called its cold war Years and the consequences of the conflict on Israel's broader Palestinian conflict and Arab conflicts....
The author spent a great deal of time or re-examine the factors that instigated the conflict by reviewing both the ancient texts and accounts of modern scholars.... It is a distinguished historical account meant for general readers, providing a new dimension to the examination of Western civilization.... Something unique about the author is that he courageously confronted and argued either in favour or against some historical figures, hence giving his view a balanced argumentative structure....
He considers it to be an indicator of the cold war.... The author of the "cold war: Account for the Rise and Fall of Detente" paper states that much positive change had already occurred in the years since World War II—the material progress, the victories against discrimination, the new horizons that had opened for education and creativity.... The close cooperation of the USSR and the USA was changed into the hard confrontation that got the name 'cold war'....
The peacebuilding that is performed in the form of different initiatives and operations after different kinds of war has been conducted in almost eight states that have been tremendously shattered by the cold war.... It is because of this that these kinds of violence have caused a considerable amount of debate among the different policymakers as well as students involved in conflict management in recent years.... This is usually known as the post-conflict peacebuilding....
"Ethnic conflict: Ethnic Groups, Causes of conflict and Violence" paper discusses the causes of ethnic conflict and aspects of migration using two empirical examples.... The cause of ethnic conflict varies in many kinds of literature but the most common causes are territorial claims, political autonomy, economic, and deep-seated hatred to another ethnic group.... In other words, the cause of ethnic conflict is rooted in unsatisfied needs and hatred caused by memories of past injustices by a neighboring group....
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"The Cold War as a Historical Conflict"
with a personal 20% discount.