Download file to see previous pages...
he loss is the result of the use of mass destruction nuclear means for just two days, then the question of the expediency and necessity of such a step of the US military operation rises. Taking into account the USA command’s belief of the Japanese capitulation being fostered by the threat of possible continuing of atomic bombing, can the fact of mass civilians’ killing be justified or not?
The question of the appropriateness of the atomic bombings of Japan and their role for the end of World War II as well as their ethical validity is still the subject of scientific and public debates. There are numerous for and against arguments in this respect, and the followers of every version have particular data for support their ideas.
First of all, let’s see what facts may prove the justification of dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The main reason for such a decision is the desire to stop the bloody war by Japanese capitulation as quickly as possible, for preventing the massive casualties on both sides during the invasion on the territory of the belligerent powers. It was assumed that there would be great losses among the armed forces and civilian population in any case, reasoning in the military offensive or the continuation of the food blockade of Japan by overlapping not only sea routes of import but land ones as well. Feeling the whole responsibility for the consequences of his words lay on his shoulders the American President Truman says:
The opponents of dropping of atomic bombs see no military necessity in their usage for Japan was suffering from bombing every day and was almost ready to capitulate. Another reason not to justify the decision of the US command, soul touching one, is the immoral nature of such a way of killing people which is perceived as a war crime against humanity and the genocide. According to the words of admiral William D. Leahy, President Truman’s Chief of Staff, the nuclear means like atomic bombs are not
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
All things considered and given that hindsight is 20/20 the first bomb, though horrific, was necessary. The second bomb was a result of bigotry and hate. It can be understood why America felt this way toward the Japanese and Germans but it doesn’t make it right.
During the Second World War, the same was witnessed as the United States and the Japanese attacked innocent civilians, all in the name of winning, and proving their might with the destruction they were able to cause to the enemy. According to Crowe, the bombing of Hiroshima occurred during the August of 1945.
On 6th of August, 1945, the American airmen attacked with the the first nuclear weapon in history on Hiroshima named little boy which was sufficient enough to kill 90000 people immediately followed by 40 000 injured who died with the agony of radiation and burns.
Nagasaki also encountered the same disaster three days later. Death, deadly radiation, fire and pollution swallowed the cities completely. Buildings and other structures collapsed and houses burst into flame (Richard Minear, 1990). Electrical systems and inflammatory substances added to the fire and burst.
The bombs were drooped by the United States of America; Harry S. Truman was the president of USA. Controversies still continue to emerge over the two bombings which killed thousands of people in both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki city. Critics argue the bombing was unnecessary while supporters argue that the bombs forced the Japanese to surrender.
After six months of intense fire-bombing of 67 other Japanese cities, the nuclear bomb “Little Boy” was dropped on the city of Hiroshima on Monday 6th August, 1945, which was duly followed on August 9th by the detonation of the “Fat Man” nuclear bomb over Nagasaki.
On August 6, 1945, American Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, its primary target, and gave the whole world "a peep into hell"(qtd. in Zuberi 623). For Japan, August became synonymous with Apocalypse of Hiroshima during WWII. Within three days, Nagasaki was
In this regard, rapid development in technology in weaponry as well as continuous changes in doctrine can be regarded as few of the key aspects leading to transform modern warfare into more destructive than ever. Undoubtedly, the significant emergence of war doctrines
38 Pages(9500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic THE DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB ON HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI for FREE!