StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
One of the reasons why the Anti-Federalists claimed that the 1787 Constitution was a betrayal to the American Revolution is that, the constitution gave the national government similar authority to that which they had just fought against. To them, restoring the power to tax and…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.2% of users find it useful
Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution"

Download file to see previous pages According to the events that led to the formation of the new constitution, it is only right to note that the new Constitution was a step forward in strengthening the revolution. The main aim of the revolution was to achieve independence from the British, but it did not mean that United States of America could not form its own government or manage itself. The new constitution is a representation of the strength of the revolution, by recognising its weaknesses and strengthening them to form a national government, and not a betrayal to what the people of the United States fought against. This essay will describe how the new constitution was a means to strengthening the American Revolution.
1780s is referred to as the critical period. It is during this period that American Revolution faced intense challenges. America already had a Constitution (the Articles of Confederation) which helped the government win the revolutionary war, establish a territorial governance system in the Northwest Territories, resolve conflicting state land claims, and negotiate the 1783 treaty of Paris.[This is a brief description of the benefits of the previous constitution. what was this?] Under this Constitution however, the confederation Congress was unable to protect the nation’s commerce, could not pay the interest owed on national debt, and had no power to fight economic depression. America, after achieving its independence, was in chaos. It had a national debt which it was unable to pay because of lack of congressional powers to raise the money. Congress could ask states to contribute revenue, but could not force them to do so. America needed a sure way of getting revenue to pay its debts and govern the nation well. It experienced inflation which was as a result of a move to clear the national debt. Instead of collecting revenue through taxation, state and national governments printed money. Taxing the people was not an option at the time. This is ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal Essay”, n.d.)
Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1616568-were-the-anti-federalists-correct-was-the-1787-constitution-a-betrayal-of-the-american-revolution
(Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal Essay)
Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1616568-were-the-anti-federalists-correct-was-the-1787-constitution-a-betrayal-of-the-american-revolution.
“Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1616568-were-the-anti-federalists-correct-was-the-1787-constitution-a-betrayal-of-the-american-revolution.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution

Critically examine the claim that people are an organisation's most valued asset. How this claim would be translated into prac

10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution

...The Anti-Federalists objections to the Constitution Those who sought the endorsement of the United States constitution between the year 1787 and 1788 referred to themselves as the “Federalists”. On the other hand, those who had various objections to the constitution were labeled as the Anti-federalists. The Anti-federalists had a variety of objections to the constitution. However, they were all united by their belief that liberty could only be secured in a small republic with limited powers in which the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution

...History and Political Science 18 September Were the Anti-Federalists Correct? Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution? Why or Why not? Why the Federalists’ Opposition was Correct The founding fathers of federalism for United States of America had great expectation and a desire for a functional government, to maintain order in the nation. The push and the predicted effects of the constitution however created opposing forces to the ratification of the U.S. constitution. The...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Essential Question: Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution Why or w

...in office, the president would always be re-elected and thus would serve for life’. This was the fear among the other anti-federalist in the United States but this fear was ended when Jefferson himself stepped down after two terms, setting a precedent. Yet unequivocally on the grounds that we are such a rowdy and equitable individuals, as the designers of 1787 liked, we have discovered that an administration made up of pivoting dilettantes can't look after the relentlessness and coherence that are far reaching. The exposure of the American leaders resulted into smooth transition as compared to the bloody French revolution and other clamor for...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

American Constitution of 1787 and pluralism

...government that worked through a constitution that ensured that freedom equality and order prevailed in the country. The American constitution of 1787 promotes the application of pluralism in the USA thus giving the citizen power to govern their nation. Pre constitution America In the 1970s USA did not exist but there were just thirteen colonies under the Great Britain. In the 1970s, not everyone in the United States of America had the same opportunities. Blacks, women, Native Americans, and poor men had no voting rights and could not hold any elective posts. The British colonies in North America adopted their form of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

American Constitution

...ACLU v NSA July 09 2009 The American Civil Liberties Union brought a case against the National Security Agency which was decided on the 6th of July 2007. On January the 16 2006, ACLU on its own behalf and that of three other organizations and five individuals sued the NSA and sought declaratory judgment and relief arguing that the Terrorist Surveillance Program was unconstitutional and illegal according to the fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment is part of the United States Constitution, falling under the Bill of Rights in its most basic form is said to protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. This amendment was created when the writ of assistance was exploited during the American Revolution. The details... for...
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper

Debate and Conflict Between Federalists and Anti Federalists

...Federalists versus Anti-Federalists The U.S. Constitution was proposed and drafted at a convention convened in Philadelphia in 1787 by a distinguished group of influential men headed by Alexander Hamilton. At this time, its ratification in 1789 was far from assured. In all of the thirteen colonies, differing interests and groups both supported and opposed a federal constitution, sparking an intense public debate. Those in favor of the proposed constitution including Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay wrote a series of essays (85) that were published in newspapers referred to as the...
9 Pages(2250 words)Coursework

Debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists

...grown apathetic and cynical, accepting the relative ineffectiveness of the federal government as unchangeable. While the populist position of the Anti-Federalists made it the obvious choice for the majority of Americans, the Federalist leadership through such men as Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, made the latter group the victor. With the widely read Federalist Papers, the tide was turned in favor of ratification of the Constitution; and while the Anti-Federalists had the ideals of liberty and sovereignty on their side, their arguments were bested by the persistence...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

American constitution

...Full Define politics and discuss 4 roles of government (enforce and create laws, provide social infrastructure, protects human rights, provide public safety). The term politics generally relates to the event of governing and running the affairs of a particular state. It also encompasses the method of power by the ruling entity (Jowett 6). Modern politics however delves on the relation of the people and the discourse and relationship it has over its governing body. The responsibilities of the government are critical to the success and well-being of the population and state wherein it governs. Firstly, it is in charge of enforcing and creating laws for the benefit and protection of its citizens. This is necessary to preserve... Define...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today

... United s Constitution: Filibuster law in the United s A filibuster in the great United Senate, basically refers to an obstruction or dilatory measures used to prevent or block certain assess from being voted for (Abegg, 2013, p. 219). The common type of a filibuster comes after a certain senator tries to delay or completely prevent a vote on a certain bill by rather extending the discussion on the issue at hand (Steffen, 2012, p. 201). The usual rule allows the senator or a number of senators to talk on the measure for as long as they want on any particular topic they decide to chose unless the three fifths of the senators duly chosen and also sworn. In the United States, the senate voted for the change of rules that enabled... the...
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution for FREE!

Contact Us