Increase the United States Economic Aid in the East Region that Diminishes Support for Terrorism - Research Paper Example

Would increasing US economic aid in the Middle East region diminish support for terrorism and anti-American sentiment? Pros Foreign aid to countries has a high likelihood of creating opportunities of acceptance of new ideas thereby functioning as a legal bribe. This foreign aid can function to equip people economically and divert their attention from terrorism. Therefore, the more the aid the more people are won to antiterrorism side. This aid is not only for the benefit of terrorism efforts but also for the secured interests in the Middle East Region oil reserves. Increased economic aid will mean good living standards d for the people in this region that will create a more solid foundation for the desired effects. It will lead to synergistic effects that will go hand in hand to bring out the positive attributes that now are obscured by poverty. Cons Foreign aid does not solve their problems of relenting their anger as to the long handedness of America in its political and historical matters. Social change cannot be implemented through economic aid for this change can only be initiated through well functioning governments. It will benefit the Middle East region at the expense of US who has one of the worst budget deficits of its time. It will only make the people of this region lazy to the extent of always depending ion foreign aid. It will mean that they will be doing it against there will thus risking a possible return to the same ideals. The US approach to terrorism has been down to business in the making. This lead to the establishment of Proliferation Security initiative (PSI) in 2003 that was aimed at preventing proliferation to or from all nations either supporting or against the initiative. This explains why the US has decided to promote reform and democracy through economic and democratic strategies. This is so because economic and democratic opportunities are significant in countering the ideologies they hold close to their heart. iThis is because it can function as a tool in bargaining. This is where a country that has received foreign aid or is anticipating having their regular installments is bound to be receptive to new ideas. In most cases, this foreign aid functions as a legal bribe. Therefore, if, it is increased it means that people will be more accepting of these new ideas of getting rid of terrorism. However, after the fall of the Soviet Union the US placed itself strategically to implement its views to other countries as a measure, to stop the spread of communism. A telling case is when US sacrificed to give Aid to Russia so that it could not pull out of Chenyanya because of its significance in battle against terrorism. This saw the US give eight hundred million dollars to Russia in 1997 and the former nations that were for communism. This is a superb example of how foreign aid can be beneficial in trying to have certain nations sing to the dance of America. The increases of aid will not only help Middle East region accept the new ideas; it will also develop and equip them economicallyii. This will most likely function in diverting their efforts to positive activities that increase their living standards. This is because these terrorist activities come because of boredom due to no employment that can generate money. It is through such circumstances that people from the Middle Eastern seek a leeway out of this by in involving themselves in any activity. This also increases the risk of these people to fall victim of drugs that they believe to reduce their burden. Therefore, the existence of this foreign aid by Americans is sure to help them and minimize on numbers that are being recruited into terrorist groups. Another point is that American is a developed nation with one of the biggest economies and one of the largest populations. iiiThis means that it has many industries to run, people to provide for their needs, and care of its security. More economic aid means that it will function to cater for all these three at the same time. The oil reserves in the Middle East mean a lot to the vehicle and manufacturing industry of the US. This means that in killing a bird with one stone. The US will have secured its interests in the oil sector to cater for its population. Then how would such an opportunity pass the strategic US in seizing it? Therefore, the antiterrorism efforts of US in the Middle East region can be so problematic to the United States; this is because America is so much affected by conflict in the Middle East because they are most of the time forced to take sides and mediate. This is emphasized by the fact that the Middle East has had numerous attempts at peace talks. In all these, America has turned out to be the most involved country as compared to the other nations. This is not a surprise because America is so much affected by conflict in the Middle East because they are most of the time forced to take sides and mediateiv. This is emphasized by the fact that the Middle East has seen has numerous attempts at peace talks and America has turned out to be the most involved country as compared to the other nations. This is not a surprise because .The US is always seen as a leader in international diplomatic talks. Therefore, this seems as a compulsory that the US gets involved in the peace talks. This is a sure reason why the US should increase its economic aid in the Middle East region. However, the financial aid is deemed to backfire on Americans on a number of occasions. This is because, the sprouting of terrorism is partly connected to religion where most of the Arab world embraces Islam. Islam has its own values as a religion without forgetting the jihadist movements. The modern time terrorist activities have both religious and political issues interconnected. Even though compromise is essential for resolution, it will only depend on whether the psychological lives of these people are taken care of in the best way possible v.A good example is Israel whose step towards peace was solely dependent on the successful pullout of Palestine who at the time were focused on stopping terrorism. This is because establishing peace negotiations with people who chose to speak through acts of terror that is especially directed to civilians is indeed a difficult task. In part, these terrorist organizations do prefer to continue with their evil acts instead of exhausting the possibilities that can provide them a better futurevi. This is when the economic aid is powerless in trying to get these people to table and discuss matters of terrorism. Another point is that, in part, the chaos in the Middle East is because of condemnation of the US nation building where they believe that outsiders can only initiate social change towards freedom. A good example is the spontaneous events that took place in Egypt and some other countries in the Middle East. This is because they brought to light the flaws that exist in planning mentality those societies to move forwards there is a need for outside assistance. This is in addition to the multifaceted collection of institutions that strengthen societies. Miglieth asserts that it should be on record that US is not the best, as compared to other countries involved, in predicting and establishing social change.vii This is because even though the US intelligences have been considered as superior, they failed to predict the Afghanistan and Iraq conflict. This present formidable evidence that social change cannot be initiated from outside but from within, and that it is so complex that cannot be understood by its expertsviii. This means that the economic aid is from initiating this change and that this strategy of war against terrorism should be relooked in to map the best foot forward. This is so because the antiterrorism and anti-American sentiments can only be taken care of at the social level and not at the economic level. Conclusion The US is making an effort in trying to fight this war on terrorism and at the same time guarding its image in this region. This is because these efforts are better than nothing is at all. Even though some argue that social change cannot be effected through economic aid, to some extent, it is functions. This is because, social change can be affected through numerous aspects of life and economy top up is one of them. This is because, in the creation of a socially acceptable behavior, making people busy and have something to look up to plays an important function in stabilizing their behavior. This means that besides the creation of employment and other income generating activities, America will receive the cooperation it needs and the change of heart of the Middle easterners. This will be achieved because in their appreciation of America’s generosity they will want to appease them in trying to change their attitudes towards them and subsequent relook at terrorism. Therefore, freedom and hope mostly function to defeat this thought of hate. It is therefore incumbent on US to spread democracy to these nations apart from the economic aid. This is because; free nations have a tendency not to support terrorists or mount an attack on their neighbors. Therefore, this will function to make a more peaceful; world and a secure America. Works cited Eur. The Middle East and North Africa 2003. New York. Routledge, 2002.print. Halabi, Yakub. US foreign policy in the Middle East: from crises to change. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2009. Print. Miglietta, John. American alliance policy in the Middle East, 1945-1992: Iran, Israel, and SaudiArabia. New York.Lexington Books, 2002. Print. Read More