Discussion Board - Assignment Example

Discussion Board The three speeches are all plausible. They glaringly vary in tone, sentence structure, opinion and diction. However, the critical issue of slavery seems to form the bulk of the three speeches. Slavery was a defining even in the American history. It indeed left deep scars. That millions of black people and people of the color went through torture, discrimination, enjoyed unequal rights in the glaringly cruelest manner, and were never represented by anyone within the circles of the then harsh American society; is something that causes pain as we reflect on it today.

Even more, the issue of slavery was something that caused agitation, a stir and impasse within the corridors politics and the dynamic American society. Calhoun in his speech stresses that the palatable shakeup of the subject of slavery would, if not vetoed by some judicious and effectual measure, end in disagreement amongst the parties involved. Calhoun in his plausible speech believes that the anguish had reached certain levels that were potentially harmful to the survival of the Union. At this point, the kind of threat that faces the Union prompts Calhoun to opine the urgent need to preserve the Union.

In contrast, Webster in his speech is in favor of compromising. In his speech, Webster believes strongly so that the Constitution should recognize property in slavery. Similarly, Seward like Calhoun in his pristine speech acknowledges that the Union was steeped in danger, and that the only way to save it was through compromise. In contrast, however, Seward in his speech appears to be objected towards the inclusion of slavery into the Constitution. He opines that the constitutional recognition of slavery is in contravention to the law of nature.

Considerably, he goes further to express the fact we rely upon the laws of God, which outlaw slavery. And that all human enactments are re-enactments of God’s law. Despite it being florid and overwrought, I find Seward’s argument a lot more compelling as it puts the human interests first before anything. His argument is primed on the bicentenary of the elimination of slavery.ReferencesRemini, R. V. (2008). Daniel Webster: the man and his time. New York: W.W. Norton.Seward, W. H. (2009). The works of William H.

Seward, Volume 1. Michigan: the University of Michigan.